Validation of Performance-Based Specifications for Surface Asphalt Mixtures in Virginia

Abstract

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), like many owner agencies, is interested in ways to facilitate the increased durability of asphalt mixes in an effort to make its roadway network more sustainable, longer lasting, and more economical. The balanced mix design (BMD) method proposes to address this through the incorporation of performance criteria into mix design and acceptance. VDOT has committed to the implementation of the BMD method in an effort to improve asphalt mix performance. The purpose of this study was to continue advancing efforts toward implementation of BMD through the evaluation of 13 asphalt mixes using performance-indicating laboratory tests, validation of the initial performance tests selected for BMD use, and validation of the initial test threshold criteria. Based on the results, the asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) rut test, indirect tensile cracking test (IDT-CT), and Cantabro test were found suitable for continued use in BMD. The current threshold criteria for all three tests were found reasonable based on additional mix testing. The study recommends that APA rut test and IDT-CT results should be compared and correlated to fundamental rutting and cracking tests, respectively, as well as to performance predictions obtained from mechanistic-empirical pavement design simulations, and to field performance for full assurance that test threshold values are appropriate. It was further recommended to evaluate the Cantabro, IDT-CT, and APA rut tests to determine acceptable variability and establish precision statements.