Quantifying Recent Trends in Class 1 Freight Railroad Train Length and Weight by Train Type

Abstract

Railroads have a strong economic incentive to maximize the length and weight of freight trains. Since the mid-1990s, various technological innovations have facilitated operation of longer and heavier trains, and railroads have made infrastructure investments to accommodate them. Recent shifts in railway operating and management strategies have placed added emphasis on long trains but have also drawn public and agency scrutiny. The advantages and disadvantages of increased train size are difficult to analyze because public data on train length and weight over time are limited. Articulated intermodal railcars, artificially short local trains, and light empty unit trains skew industry averages across all train types and mask trends over time. To provide greater insight on the average and distribution of train length and weight for different train types over time, the research team conducted a detailed analysis of Class 1 railroad annual report financial data and Surface Transportation Board waybill sample data collected for the years 1996 through 2018. Dividing traffic statistics by train type allows for a specific focus on loaded unit train length and weight distributions that isolates many factors skewing overall averages. Over the past 23 years, the average length and weight of loaded non-hazmat unit trains have steadily increased. Train size distributions indicate that unit trains exceeding 140 railcars in length have become more frequent over the past 10 years, whereas hazmat unit trains are typically smaller in size. This information can aid researchers and industry practitioners in assessing the benefits and disadvantages of operating longer trains.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of American Railroads (AAR). Railroad Facts, 2019 ed. Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C., 2019.

Lovett

A. H.

Dick

C. T.

Barkan

C. P. L.

Determining Freight Train Delay Costs on Railroad Lines in North America. Proc., IAROR 6th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis, Tokyo, Japan, 2015.

Fullerton

G. A.

DiDomenico

G. C.

Dick

C. T.

Sensitivity of Freight and Passenger Rail Fuel Efficiency to Infrastructure, Equipment, and Operating Factors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2476: 59–66.

Moore Ede

W. J.

Polivka

Tunna

Optimizing Capacity by Trade-Offs Among Train Control, Infrastructure, Mechanical, and Engineering Considerations. Proc., International Heavy Haul Association Specialist Technical Session, Kiruna, Sweden, 2007.

Barrington

Peltz

10,000-ft Distributed Power Intermodal Trains. Proc., 9th International Heavy Haul Association Conference, Shanghai, China, 2009.

Martland

C. D.

Introduction of Heavy Axle Loads by the North American Rail Industry, 1990 to 2012. Proc., 54th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Annapolis, MD, 2013, pp. 36–53.

Diaz de Rivera

Dick

C. T.

Evans

L. E.

Potential for Moving Blocks and Train Fleets to Enable Faster Train Meets on Single-Track Rail Corridors. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 146, No. 8, 2020, p. 04020077. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000403

Atanassov

Dick

C. T.

Capacity of Single-Track Railway Lines with Short Sidings to Support Operation of Long Freight Trains. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2475: 95–101.

Dick

C. T.

Atanassov

Kippen

F. B.

Mussanov

Relative Train Length and the Infrastructure Required to Mitigate Delays from Operating Combinations of Normal and Over-Length Freight Trains on Single-Track Railway Lines in North America. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 233, No. 7, 2019, pp. 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409718809204

10.

Richards

C. W.

Cobb

Multiple-Track Main Lines. Trains, January 2006.

11.

Dick

C. T.

Influence of Traffic Complexity and Schedule Flexibility on Railway Classification Yard Capacity and Mainline Performance. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2019.

12.

Dong

Modeling Rail Freight Operations Under Different Operating Strategies. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

13.

Wang

B. Z.

Quantitative Analyses of Freight Train Derailments. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2019.

14.

United States Government Accountability Office (US GAO). Rail Safety: Freight Trains Are Getting Longer, and Additional Information Is Needed to Assess Their Impact. Publication GAO-19-443. United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C., 2019.

15.

Starr

J. T.

Evolution of the Unit Train: 1960–1969. University of Chicago, Committee on Geographical Studies, Research Papers, Chicago, IL, 1976.

16.

Beck

Connell

Iden

Western Coal Service on Union Pacific Railroad: Operations and Maintenance Update. Proc., International Heavy Haul Association Specialist Technical Session, Dallas, TX, 2003.

17.

Bell

Driving Efficiency, Preserving Infrastructure and Creating Capacity with Long Trains. Proc., 10th International Heavy Haul Association Conference, New Delhi, India, 2013, pp. 789–795.

18.

Newman

R. R.

Zarembski

A. M.

Resor

R. R.

Economic Implications of Heavy Axle Loads on Equipment Design Operations and Maintenance. Proc., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, WAM RTD-Volume 4, Rail Transportation, Atlanta, GA, 1991.

19.

Dick

C. T.

Clayton

A. M.

Impact of New Railway Technology on Grain Transportation in Western Canada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001. 1742: 45–53.

20.

Prater

O’Neil

Jr . The Shift to Larger Railcars for the Shipment of Grain. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, D.C., 2013. https://doi.org/10.9752/TS087.08-2013.

21.

Grimes

G. A.

Planning for Unitrain Operations on Missouri Pacific. Proc., Transportation Research Forum, San Francisco, CA, 1981, pp. 121–126.

22.

Keaton

M. H.

Service-Cost Tradeoffs for Carload Freight Traffic in the U.S. Rail Industry. Transportation Research Part A: General, Vol. 25A, No. 6, 1991, pp. 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(91)90014-H

23.

Martland

C. D.

Railroad Train Delay and Network Reliability. Report R-991. Association of American Railroads, Transportation Technology Center, Inc., Baltimore, MD, 2008.

24.

Blaine

D. G.

Hengel

M. F.

Peterson

J. H.

Train Brake and Track Capacity Requirements for the ‘80s. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 103, 1981, pp. 392–401.

25.

Welch

Gussow

Expansion of Canadian National Railway’s Line Capacity. Interfaces, Vol. 16, 1986, pp. 51–64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25060783

26.

Barton

McWha

Reducing Emissions in the Rail Sector: Technology and Infrastructure Scan and Analysis. Report. Transport Canada Transportation Development Centre, Ottawa, Canada, 2012.

27.

Blaszak

Illinois Central: A Railroad for the Nineties. Trains, 1992.

28.

Harrison

E. H.

CN – How We Work and Why: Running a Precision Railroad. Canadian National Railway Company, Montreal, PQ, Canada, 2005.

29.

Stagl

Class I Railroads Continue the Longer-Train Trend. Progressive Railroading, July 2018, pp. 12–16.

30.

Barrow

Precision Scheduled Railroading – Evolution or Revolution?

International Railway Journal, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2019, pp. 24–28.

31.

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Emergency Order Establishing a Maximum Operating Speed of 40 mph in High-Threat Urban Areas, 2015. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/27/2015-09614/emergency-order-establishing-a-maximum-operating-speed-of-40-mph-in-high-threat-urban-areas-for.

32.

Surface Transportation Board (STB). R-1 Annual Report Financial Data, 1996–2018. https://www.stb.gov/econdata.nsf/FinancialData?OpenView.

33.

Surface Transportation Board (STB). Public Use Carload Waybill Sample Data, 1996–2018. https://prod.stb.gov/reports-data/waybill/.