The number of crashes and fatalities rate in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, U.S., have been higher than the national average for the past decades. It has been hypothesized that the distinct socioeconomic conditions of the state could be contributing to and explaining these trends. This study investigated the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on highway safety in Kentucky and attempted to identify the high-risk driver groups, based on crash data and the socioeconomic and demographic features of their residence zip codes. The quasi-induced exposure technique and binary logistic regression were employed to develop a predictive modeling approach for determining the probability of being the at-fault driver in a single- and two-unit crashes, based on socioeconomic characteristics of the driver residence zip code. The study identified that socioeconomic features such as income, poverty level, employment, age, gender, rurality, and number of traffic-related convictions of a driver’s zip code influence their likelihood to be at fault in a two-unit crash, while for single-unit crashes, in addition to these variables, educational attainment had also an impact. Younger and older drivers living in zip codes with low socioeconomic conditions have a higher probability to be the at-fault driver in both single- and two-unit crashes. The conclusions of the study can be used to determine the regions (zip codes) and driver groups with higher likelihood to be the at-fault driver in a crash and develop effective safety programs for the target groups.
BrownK. T. A Safety Analysis of Spatial Phenomena About the Residences of Drivers Involved in Crashes. Dissertation. Graduate School of Clemson University, 2016. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1746
4.
NolandR. B.OhL.The Effect of Infrastructure and Demographic Change on Traffic-Related Fatalities and Crashes: A Case Study of Illinois County-Level Data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2004, pp. 525–532.
5.
AdanuE. K.SmithR.PowellL.JonesS.Multilevel Analysis of the Role of Human Factors in Regional Disparities in Crash Outcomes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 109, 2017, pp. 10–17.
6.
FactorR.MahalelD.YairG.Inter-Group Differences in Road-Traffic Crash Involvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 2000–2007.
7.
HasselbergM.VaezaM.LaflammeL.Socioeconomic Aspects of the Circumstances and Consequences of Car Crashes among Young Adults. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2005, pp. 287–295.
8.
AdanuE.PenmetsaP.JonesS.SmithR.Gendered Analysis of Fatal Crashes among Young Drivers in Alabama, USA. Safety, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2018, p. 29
9.
Aguero-ValverdeJ.JovanisP. P.Spatial Analysis of Fatal and Injury Crashes in Pennsylvania. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2006, pp. 618–625.
10.
HannaC. L.LaflammeL.BinghamC. R.Fatal Crash Involvement of Unlicensed Young Drivers: County Level Differences According to Material Deprivation and Urbanicity in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 291–295.
11.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2018.
12.
KocatepeA.UlakM. B.OzguvenE. E.HornerM. W.ArghandehR.Socioeconomic Characteristics and Crash Injury Exposure: A Case Study in Florida Using Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method. Applied Geography, Vol. 87, 2017, pp. 207–221.
13.
StamatiadisN.PucciniG.Fatal Crash Rates in the Southeastern United States: Why Are They Higher?Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999. 1665: 118–124.
StamatiadisN.DeaconJ. A.Quasi-Induced Exposure: Methodology and Insight. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1997, pp. 37–52.
18.
LymanS.FergusonS. A.BraverE. R.WilliamsA. F.Older Driver Involvements in Police Reported Crashes and Fatal Crashes: Trends and Projections. Injury Prevention, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2002, pp. 116–120.
19.
SagarS.StamatiadisN.WrightS.GreenE.Use of Codes Data to Improve Estimates of at-Fault Risk of Elderly Drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 105637.
DasS.SunX.WangF.LeboeufC.Estimating Likelihood of Future Crashes for Crash-Prone Drivers. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 2, No. 3, 2015, pp. 145–157.
22.
ChandraratnaS.StamatiadisN.StrombergA.Potential Crash Involvement of Young Novice Drivers with Previous Crash and Citation Records. Human Performance; Simulation And Visualization, Vol. 1937, 2005, pp. 1–6.
ChandraratnaS.StamatiadisN.Quasi-Induced Exposure Method: Evaluation of Not-at-Fault Assumption. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2009, pp. 308–313.
25.
ShenS.PopeC. N.StamatiadisN.ZhuM.Validation of Not-at-Fault Driver Representativeness Assumption for Quasi-Induced Exposure Using U.S. National Traffic Databases. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 71, 2019, pp. 243–249.
26.
ChenC.ZhangG.TianZ.BogusS. M.YangY.Hierarchical Bayesian Random Intercept Model-Based Cross-Level Interaction Decomposition for Truck Driver Injury Severity Investigations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 85, 2015, pp. 186–198.
27.
SagarS. Effect of Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors of Driver Residence on Crash Occurrence. Theses and dissertations. Civil Engineering, 94, University of Kentucky. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ce_etds/94.
28.
LambertJ.GongL.ElliottC. F.ThompsonK.StrombergA.Rfsa: An R Package for Finding Best Subsets and Interaction. The R Journal, Vol. 10, 2018, pp. 295–308.
29.
CarrB. R.A Statistical Analysis of Rural Ontario Traffic Accidents Using Induced Exposure Data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 1, 1969, pp. 33–357.
30.
RegevS.RolisonJ. J.MoutariS.Crash Risk by Driver Age, Gender, and Time of Day Using a New Exposure Methodology. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 66, 2018, pp. 131–140.
31.
StamatiadisN.DeaconJ. A.Trends in Highway Safety: Effects of an Aging Population on Accident Propensity. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1995, pp. 443–459.
32.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute. Fatality Facts 2019: Males and Females Gender. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute, 2018. https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/gender.
33.
SivakM.Female Drivers in the United States, 1963–2010: From a Minority to a Majority?Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2013, pp. 259–260.
34.
TurnerC.Mc ClureR.Age and Gender Differences in Risk-Taking Behaviour as an Explanation for High Incidence of Motor Vehicle Crashes as a Driver in Young Males. Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2003, pp. 123–130.
35.
StaplinL.LococoK. H.StewartJ.DecinaL. E.Safety Mobility for Older Drivers Handbook. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 1999.
36.
StuttsJ.MartellC.StaplinL.Identifying Behaviors and Situations Associated with Increased Crash Risk for Older Drivers. Office of Behavioral Safety Research and U. S. D. o. T. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2009.
TranmerM.SteelD. G.Using Census Data to Investigate the Causes of the Ecological Fallacy. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1998, pp. 817–831.
