Dark lighting conditions, including those occurring at dawn and dusk, are correlated with increased nonmotorist crash frequency owing to reduced visibility, but little research has been done that investigates the spatial relationship between roadway lights and nonmotorist crashes on a community scale. This research used kernel density estimation methods to calculate the commonalities between geolocated streetlight data and non-motorist-vehicle crashes from 2010 to 2018 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. It was observed that dawn, dusk, and darkness showed a significant correlation between nonmotorist crashes and the absence of roadway lighting, all exceeding the control analysis undertaken with crashes occurring in daylight. The Getis-Ord hot spot cluster analysis indicated that areas with the greatest density of streetlights were associated with fewer nonmotorist crash hot spots. Future research seeks to corroborate these findings with data from other cities and to assess roadway lighting as a facet of pedestrian network connectivity.
American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials. Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, 1st ed.AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004.
ANSP/IES RP-8-18. American National Standard Practice for Design and Maintenance of Roadway and Parking Facility Lighting. Illuminating Engineering Society, New York, 2018.
FotiosS.GibbonsR.Road Lighting Research for Drivers and Pedestrians: The Basis of Luminance and Illuminance Recommendations. Lighting Research & Technology, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2018, pp. 154–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153517739055.
8.
BeccaliM.BonomoloM.LecceseF.ListaD.SalvadoriG.On the Impact of Safety Requirements, Energy Prices and Investment Costs in Street Lighting Refurbishment Design. Energy, Vol. 165, 2018, pp. 739–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.011.
9.
WoodJ. M.IsoardiG.BlackA.CowlingI.Nighttime Driving Visibility Associated with LED Streetlight Dimming. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 121, 2018, pp. 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.023.
10.
LutkevichP.GibbonsR.BhagavathulaR.McLeanD.; National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Solid-State Roadway Lighting Design Guide: Volume 2: Research Overview. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2020. https://doi.org/10.17226/25679.
11.
HaansA.de KortY. A.Light Distribution in Dynamic Street Lighting: Two Experimental Studies on its Effects on Perceived Safety, Prospect, Concealment, and Escape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2012, pp. 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.006.
12.
BalasubramanianV.BhardwajR.Pedestrians’ Perception and Response Towards Vehicles During Road-Crossing at Nighttime. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 110, 2018, pp. 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.025.
13.
MianJ.CairdJ. K.The Effects of Speed and Orientation on Recognition Judgments of Retro-Reflectively Clothed Pedestrians at Night. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 56, 2018, pp. 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.006.
14.
KwanI.MapstoneJ.Visibility Aids for Pedestrians and Cyclists: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2004, pp. 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00008-3.
15.
WoodJ. M.TyrrellR. A.CarberryT. P.Limitations in Drivers’ Ability to Recognize Pedestrians at Night. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2005, pp. 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005774859980.
16.
TyrrellR. A.WoodJ. M.ChaparroA.Car-berryT. P.ChuB.-S.MarszalekR. P.Seeing Pedestrians at Night: Visual Clutter Does Not Mask Biological Motion. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.001.
17.
FylanF.KingM.BroughD.BlackA. A.KingN.BentleyL. A.WoodJ. M.Increasing Conspicuity on Night-Time Roads: Perspectives from Cyclists and Runners. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 68, 2020, pp. 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.016.
18.
D’OrsoG.MiglioreM.A GIS-Based Method for Evaluating the Walkability of a Pedestrian Environment and Prioritised Investments. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 82, 2020, p. 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555.
19.
MitraS.Spatial Autocorrelation and Bayesian Spatial Statistical Method for Analyzing Intersections Prone to Injury Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2136: 92–100. https://doi.org/10.3141/2136-11.
20.
LiL.ZhuL.SuiD. Z.A GIS-Based Bayesian Approach for Analyzing Spatial–Temporal Patterns of Intra-City Motor Vehicle Crashes. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2007, pp. 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.08.005.
21.
YueL.Abdel-AtyM.WuY.ZhengO.YuanJ.In-Depth Approach for Identifying Crash Causation Patterns and Its Implications for Pedestrian Crash Prevention. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 73, 2020, pp. 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.020.
22.
LiuJ.HainenA.LiX.NieQ.NambisanS.Pedestrian Injury Severity in Motor Vehicle Crashes: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Modeling Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 132, 2019, p. 105272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105272.
23.
MikoskiP.ZlupkoG.OwensD. A.Drivers’ Assessments of the Risks of Distraction, Poor Visibility at Night, and Safety-Related Behaviors of Themselves and Other Drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 62, 2019, pp. 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.011.
24.
LinP.-S.GuoR.Bialkowska-JelinskaE.KourtellisA.ZhangY.Development of Countermeasures to Effectively Improve Pedestrian Safety in Low-Income Areas. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 6, No. 2, 2019, pp. 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.02.001.
25.
JohanssonO.WanvikP. O.ElvikR.A New Method for Assessing the Risk of Accident Associated with Darkness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 809–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.003.
26.
SullivanJ. M.FlannaganM. J.Determining the Potential Safety Benefit of Improved Lighting in Three Pedestrian Crash Scenarios. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2007, pp. 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.010.
27.
SullivanJ. M.FlannaganM. J.The Role of Ambient Light Level in Fatal Crashes: Inferences from Daylight Saving Time Transitions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2002, pp. 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00046-X.
28.
Gonzández-HernándezB.UsamiD. S.PrasolenkoO.BurkoD.GalkinA.LobashovO.PersiaL.The Driver’s Visual Perception Research to Analyze Pedestrian Safety at Twilight. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 45, 2020, pp. 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.087.
29.
FergusonS. A.PreusserD. F.LundA. K.ZadorP. L.UlmerR. G.Daylight Saving Time and Motor Vehicle Crashes: The Reduction in Pedestrian and Vehicle Occupant fatalities. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 85, No. 1, 1995, pp. 92–95.
30.
ChenZ.FanW. D.A Multinomial Logit Model of Pedestrian-Vehicle Crash Severity in North Carolina. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2019, pp. 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.10.001.
31.
SiddiquiN. A.ChuX.GuttenplanM.Crossing Locations, Light Conditions, and Pedestrian Injury Severity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1982: 141–149.
32.
ZhangG.YauK. K.ZhangX.Analyzing Fault and Severity in Pedestrian–Motor Vehicle Accidents in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.018.
BulloughJ. D.DonnellE. T.ReaM. S.To Illuminate or Not to Illuminate: Roadway Lighting as it Affects Traffic Safety at Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 53, 2013, pp. 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.029.
35.
LiY. E.BhagavathulaR.TerryT. N.GibbonsR.MedinaA.Safety Benefits and Best Practices for Intersection Lighting. Technical Report, FHWA/VTRC 20-R31. Virginia Department of Transportation, Blacksburg, 2020.
36.
SukJ. Y.WalterR. J.New Nighttime Roadway Lighting Documentation Applied to Public Safety at Night: A Case Study in San Antonio, Texas. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 46, 2019, p. 101459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101459.
37.
LooB. P. Y.YaoS.WuJ.Spatial Point Analysis of Road Crashes in Shanghai: A GIS-Based Network Kernel Density Method. Proc., 2011 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Shanghai, China, IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GeoInformatics.2011.5980938.
38.
BassaniM.RossettiL.CataniL.Spatial Analysis of Road Crashes Involving Vulnerable Road Users in Support of Road Safety Management Strategies. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 45, 2020, pp. 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.031.
39.
DelsoJ.MartínB.OrtegaE.Van De WegheN.Integrating Pedestrian-Habitat Models and Network Kernel Density Estimations to Measure Street Pedestrian Suitability. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 51, 2019, p. 101736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101736.
40.
HarirforoushH.BellaliteL.A New Integrated GIS-Based Analysis to Detect Hotspots: A Case Study of the City of Sherbrooke. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 130, 2019, pp. 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.015.
41.
SrikanthL.SrikanthI.A Case Study on Kernel Density Estimation and Hotspot Analysis Methods in Traffic Safety Management. Proc., 2020 International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS), Bengaluru, India, IEEE, 2020, pp. 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS48256.2020.9027448.
SongchitruksaP.ZengX.Getis–Ord Spatial Statistics to Identify Hot Spots by Using Incident Management Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2165: 42–51. https://doi.org/10.3141/2165-05.
