Roadway tunnels often include a reinforced concrete drop ceiling that is hung from the liner to create a plenum that facilitates ventilation and houses utilities. Drop ceiling panels are lightweight compared with the much thicker tunnel liner and can experience significant damage from a fire on the roadway below. This paper examines the flexural response of drop ceiling panels in two representative tunnels to standard fire curves as well as several realistic fires due to vehicular accidents. Standard fire demands as per the Rijkswaterstaat and ASTM E1529 fire curves are uniformly applied to the ceiling panels, and heat exposure contours for typical vehicle fires with heat release rates of 30, 100, and 200 MW are generated from the software CFAST. The finite element analysis software SAFIR is used to evaluate the thermo-mechanical behavior of the ceiling panels when subjected to various thermal demands from the fire below. The analysis results indicate that drop ceiling panels are highly vulnerable to fire-induced damage and potential collapse both during a fire’s active heating phase (from simultaneous loss of capacity and restraint of thermal expansion) and during the subsequent cooling period (from tension that develops when the permanently deformed panel thermally retracts). The potential for fire-induced damage or collapse of the drop ceiling panels can be mitigated by reducing the fire hazard, removing the drop ceiling, or enhancing the fire resistance of the panels via the application of passive protection or structural hardening.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NFPA. NFPA 502: Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2017.
2.
TaradaF.BrandtR.Impulse Ventilation for Tunnels—A State of the Art Review. Proc., 13th International Symposium on Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels, New Brunswick, NJ, 2009.
3.
OuyangZ.CarltonA.GuoQ.NaitoC.QuielS.Blast Vulnerability of Drop Ceilings in Roadway Tunnels. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2020, p. 04020121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001526.
GuoQ.CarltonA.QuielS. E.NaitoC. J.Stochastic Thermal Demand and Resulting Capacity Loss of Concrete Tunnel Liners Subjected to Vehicle Fires. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 293–304.
6.
GuoQ.RootK. J.CarltonA.QuielS. E.NaitoC. J.Framework for Rapid Prediction of Fire-Induced Heat Flux on Concrete Tunnel Liners with Curved Ceilings. Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 109, 2019, Article102866.
7.
QuielS. E.YokoyamaT.BregmanL. S.MuellerK. A.MarjanishviliS. M.A Streamlined Framework for Calculating the Response of Steel-Supported Bridges to Open-Air Tanker Truck Fires. Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 73, 2015, pp. 63–75.
8.
ASCE/SEI. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-13). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2014.
9.
TNO-IBBC. Beproeving van Het Gedrag Bij Verhitting van Twee Isolatie Materialen Ter Bescherming van Tunnels Bij Brand. Publication B-79-391. Instituut TNO voor Bouwmaterialen en Bouwconstructies, Delft, The Netherlands, 1979.
10.
ASTM. Test Methods for Determining Effects of Large Hydrocarbon Pool Fires on Structural Members and Assemblies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
11.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 7.4.3. Consolidated Fire and Smoke Transport (CFAST). English. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, 2019.
12.
ASTM Standard E1355-12. Guide for Evaluating the Predictive Capability of Deterministic Fire Models (Reapproved). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
13.
PeacockR. D.RenekeP. A.ForneyG. P.CFAST—Consolidated Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport (Version 7) Volume 2: User’s Guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2015.
14.
PeacockR. D.RenekeP. A.ForneyG. P.CFAST—Consolidated Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport (Version 7) Volume 1: Technical Reference Guide. Publication NIST TN 1889v1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2015, p. NIST TN 1889v1.
15.
McGrattanK.McDermottR.HostikkaS.FloydJ.Fire Dynamics Simulator Users Guide, 6th ed. Publication NIST SP 1019. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2013.
16.
LiY. Z.HuangC.AndersonJ.SvenssonR.IngasonH.HustedB.RuneforsM.WahlqvistJ.Verification, Validation and Evaluation of FireFOAM as a Tool for Performance Design. Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2017.
17.
IngasonH.Design Fire Curves for Tunnels. Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2009, pp. 259–265.
18.
IqbalN.SalleyM. H.WeerakkodyS.NUREG-1805 Fire Dynamics Tools (FDTs): Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis Methods for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Fire Protection Inspection Program. Final Report. Division of System Safety and Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 2004, p. 1016.
19.
CarvelR. O.BeardA. N.JowittP. W.DrysdaleD. D.Variation of Heat Release Rate with Forced Longitudinal Ventilation for Vehicle Fires in Tunnels. Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2001, pp. 569–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112(01)00010-8
20.
LiY. Z.FanC. G.IngasonH.LönnermarkA.JiJ.Effect of Cross Section and Ventilation on Heat Release Rates in Tunnel Fires. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 51, 2016, pp. 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.09.007
21.
IngasonH.LiY. Z.LönnermarkA.Runehamar Tunnel Fire Tests. SP Report 2011:55. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Boras, Sweden, 2011.
22.
HaddadR. K.MalukC.RedaE.HarunZ.Critical Velocity and Backlayering Conditions in Rail Tunnel Fires: State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of Combustion, Vol. 2019, 2019, Article e3510245. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jc/2019/3510245/Accessed July 28, 2020.
23.
LiY. Z.IngasonH.Position of Maximum Ceiling Temperature in a Tunnel Fire. Fire Technology, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2014, pp. 889–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0309-2
24.
FranssenJ.-M.GernayT.Modeling Structures in Fire with SAFIR®: Theoretical Background and Capabilities. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2017, pp. 300–323.
25.
CEN. EN 1992-1-2: Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-2: General Rules—Structural Fire Design. European Commission for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
26.
GarcíaE.de PablosA.BengoecheaM. A.GuaitaL.OsendiM. I.MiranzoP.Thermal Conductivity Studies on Ceramic Floor Tiles. Ceramics International, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2011, pp. 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.09.023
27.
CEN. EN 1991-1-2:2002 Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures—Part 1-2: General Actions—Actions on Structures Exposed to Fire. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
28.
MaevskiI., National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Guidelines for Emergency Ventilation Smoke Control in Roadway Tunnels. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017.
29.
Chávez-GalánJ.AlmanzaR.CuevasN. R.Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients: Experimental Estimation and Its Impact on Thermal Building Design for Walls Made of Different Mexican Building Materials. Concreto y Cemento. Investigación y Desarrollo, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2014, p. 13.
30.
MontazeriH.BlockenB.New Generalized Expressions for Forced Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients at Building Facades and Roofs. Building and Environment, Vol. 119, 2017, pp. 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.04.012
31.
QuielS.GarlockM.Parameters for Modeling a High-Rise Steel Building Frame Subject to Fire. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2010, pp. 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1260/2040-2317.1.2.115
32.
ASCE/SEI. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16). American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA, 2017.
33.
ElghazouliA. Y.CashellK. A.IzzuddinB. A.Experimental Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Steel Reinforcement at Elevated Temperature. Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2009, pp. 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.05.004
34.
CEN. EN 1994-1-2:2005 Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures—Part 1-2: General Rules—Structural Fire Design. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
35.
GernayT.FranssenJ.-M.A Formulation of the Eurocode 2 Concrete Model at Elevated Temperature That Includes an Explicit Term for Transient Creep. Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 51, 2012, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.02.001
36.
GernayT.Effect of Transient Creep Strain Model on the Behavior of Concrete Columns Subjected to Heating and Cooling. Fire Technology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2012, pp. 313–329.
37.
NiS.GernayT.Predicting Residual Deformations in a Reinforced Concrete Building Structure after a Fire Event. Engineering Structures, Vol. 202, 2020, Article 109853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109853
38.
ASTM Standard E119-19. Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
ChoiS.-W.LeeJ.ChangS.-H.A Holistic Numerical Approach to Simulating the Thermal and Mechanical Behaviour of a Tunnel Lining Subject to Fire. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 35, 2013, pp. 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.01.004
41.
YanZ.ZhuH.JuJ. W.DingW.Full-Scale Fire Tests of RC Metro Shield TBM Tunnel Linings. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 36, 2012, pp. 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.006
42.
ZhangQ.WangW.BaiS.TanY.Response Analysis of Tunnel Lining Structure under Impact and Fire Loading. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2019, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019834473
43.
AliF.NadjaiA.Abu-TairA.Explosive Spalling of Normal Strength Concrete Slabs Subjected to Severe Fire. Materials and Structures, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2011, pp. 943–956. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9678-5
44.
WangF.WangM.WangQ.Numerical Study of Effects of Deflected Angles of Jet Fans on the Normal Ventilation in a Curved Tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 31, 2012, pp. 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.04.009
45.
YiL.XuQ.XuZ.WuD.An Experimental Study on Critical Velocity in Sloping Tunnel with Longitudinal Ventilation under Fire. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 43, 2014, pp. 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.05.017
46.
The opinions expressed in this paper are the authors’ and not those of U.S. DOT, UTC-UTI, CSM, PITA, or any state DOT.
