Evaluation of Asphalt Mixture Performance Using Cracking and Durability Tests at a Full-Scale Pavement Facility

Abstract

In the asphalt materials community, the most critical research need is centered around a paradigm shift in mixture design from the volumetric process of the previous 20-plus years to an optimization procedure based on laboratory-measured mechanical properties that should lead to an increase in long-term pavement performance. This study is focused on advancing the state of understanding with respect to the value of intermediate temperature cracking tests, which may be included in a balanced mix design. The materials included are plant-mixed, laboratory-compacted specimens reheated from the 2013 Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA’s) Accelerated Loading Facility (ALF) study on reclaimed asphalt pavement/reclaimed asphalt shingle (RAP/RAS) materials. Six commonly discussed intermediate temperature (cracking and durability) performance testing (i.e., Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester [AMPT] Cyclic Fatigue, Cantabro, Illinois Flexibility Index Test [I-FIT], Indirect Tensile Cracking [ITC, also known as IDEAL-CT], Indirect Tensile N_flex, and Texas Overlay Test) were selected for use in this study based on input from stakeholders. Test results were analyzed to compare differences between the cracking tests. In addition, statistical analyses were conducted to assess the separation among materials (lanes) for each performance test. Cyclic fatigue and IDEAL-CT tests showed the most promising results. The ranking from these two tests’ index parameters matched closely with ALF field performance. Furthermore, both showed reasonable variability of test data and they were successful in differentiating between different materials.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, and Construction . National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) at Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 2016.

Yin

Garita

Taylor

West

Refining the Indirect Tensile (IDT) N_flex Factor Test to Evaluate Cracking Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures for Mix Design and Quality Assurance. Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 172, 2018, pp. 396–405.

Ozer

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Barber

Okte

Zhu

Evaluation of I-FIT Results and Machine Variability Using MnRoad Test Track Mixtures. Publication No. FHWA-ICT-17-012. Illinois Center for Transportation, Urbana, IL, 2017.

Ozer

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Singhvi

Khan

Rivera-Perez

El-Khatib

Fracture Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures with High Recycled Content Using Illinois Semicircular Bending Test Method and Flexibility Index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2575: 130–137.

Zhou

Sun

Scullion

Development of an IDEAL Cracking test for Asphalt Mix Design and QC/QA. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 18, No. S4, 2017, pp. 405–427.

Chen

Validation of Laboratory Cracking Tests for Field Top-down Cracking Performance. PhD dissertation. Auburn University, Alabama, 2020.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Standard Practice for Mixture Conditioning of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). AASHTO R 30. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Provisional Standard Method of Test for Determining the Damage Characteristic Curve of Asphalt Mixtures from Direct Tension Cyclic Fatigue Tests. AASHTO TP 107. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2018.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Provisional Standard Method of Test for Determining the Damage Characteristic Curve and Failure Criterion Using Small Specimens in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT) Cyclic Fatigue Test. AASHTO TP 133. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

10.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Provisional Standard Method of Test for Determining the Dynamic Modulus for Asphalt Mixtures Using Small Specimens in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT). AASHTO TP 132. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

11.

Federal Highway Administration. FlexMAT™ Cracking version 1.1.2. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/analysis/. Accessed December 14, 2020.

12.

Kim

Y. R.

Wang

Underwood

B. S.

Cyclic Fatigue Index Parameter (S_app) for Asphalt Performance Engineered Mixture Design. Publication No. FHWA-HIF-19-091. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2019.

13.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Provisional Standard Method of Test for Determining the Fracture Potential of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Flexibility Index Test (FIT). AASHTO TP 124. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2018.

14.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Creep Compliance and Strength of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Indirect Tensile Test Device. AASHTO T 322. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2007.

15.

American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Determination of Cracking Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Indirect Tensile Cracking Test at Intermediate Temperature. ASTM D8225. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2019.

16.

Texas Department of Transportation. Test Procedure for Overlay Test. Tex-248-F. TxDOT, Austin, TX, 2009.

17.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Provisional Standard Method of Test for Abrasion Loss of Asphalt Mixture Specimens. AASHTO TP 108. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2018.