This paper studies the empty container repositioning (ECR) problem considering the exchange of slots and empty containers among liner shipping companies. It is common for an individual shipping company to seek an optimal solution for ECR and cargo routing to maximize its own benefits. To achieve cooperation among shipping companies, a multi-stage solution strategy is proposed. With the inverse optimization technique, the guide leasing prices of slots and empty containers among shipping companies are derived considering the schedule of vessels and cargo routing. Based on the guide leasing price, a cooperative model is formulated to minimize the total cost, which includes the transportation cost for laden containers, the inventory holding cost, the container leasing cost, and the repositioning cost. All the involved shipping companies are expected to follow the best solution of ECR and cargo routing to achieve a cooperative and stable optimum. A real-world shipping network operated by three liner shipping companies is used as a case study with promising numerical results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChiangJ.Outlook of Global Container Port Market with a Focus on Asia. Dreary Maritime Advisors, 2013, p. 28.
RodrigueJ. P.ComtoisC.SlackB.The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge, Abingdon, 2017.
4.
LeeC. Y.SongD. P.Ocean Container Transport in Global Supply Chains: Overview and Research Opportunities. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 95, 2017, pp. 442–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.05.001
5.
HuangY. F.HuJ. K.YangB.Liner Services Network Design and Fleet Deployment with Empty Container Repositioning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 89, 2015, pp. 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.01.021
6.
ShintaniK.ImaiA.NishimuraE.PapadimitriouS.The Container Shipping Network Design Problem with Empty Container Repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2007, pp. 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.05.003
7.
AkyüzM. H.LeeC. Y.Service Type Assignment and Container Routing with Transit Time Constraints and Empty Container Repositioning for Liner Shipping Service Networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 88, 2016, pp. 46–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.02.007
8.
WangK.WangS. A.ZhenL.QuX. B.Ship Type Decision Considering Empty Container Repositioning and Foldable Containers. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 108, 2017, pp. 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.10.003
9.
SongD. P.DongJ. X.Cargo Routing and Empty Container Repositioning in Multiple Shipping Service Routes. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 46, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1556–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.08.003
10.
LamS. W.LeeL. H.TangL. C.An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach for the Empty Container Allocation Problem. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2007, pp. 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.04.005
11.
DongJ. X.SongD. P.Lease Term Optimisation in Container Shipping Systems. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2012, pp. 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2012.683521
12.
CrainicT. G.GendreauM.DejaxP.Dynamic and Stochastic Models for the Allocation of Empty Containers. Operations Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1993, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.41.1.102
13.
CheungR. K.ChenC. Y.A Two-Stage Stochastic Network Model and Solution Methods for the Dynamic Empty Container Allocation Problem. Transportation Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1998, pp. 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.32.2.142
14.
SongD. P.Characterizing Optimal Empty Container Reposition Policy in Periodic-Review Shuttle Service Systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007, pp. 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602150
15.
ShiN.XuD.A Markov Decision Process Model for an Online Empty Container Repositioning Problem in a Two-Port Fixed Route. International Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2011, pp. 8–17.
Di FrancescoM.CrainicT. G.ZuddasP.The Effect of Multi-Scenario Policies on Empty Container Repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2009, pp. 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.03.001
18.
SongD. P.DongJ. X.Long-Haul Liner Service Route Design with Ship Deployment and Empty Container Repositioning. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 55, 2013, pp. 188–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.012
19.
HuH.DuB.BernardoM.Leasing or Repositioning Empty Containers? Determining the Time-Varying Guide Leasing Prices for Decision Making. Maritime Policy & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1803431
20.
ShintaniK.KoningsR.ImaiA.The Impact of Foldable Containers on Container Fleet Management Costs in Hinterland Transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2010, pp. 750–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.12.008
21.
MoonI.NgocA. D. D.KoningsR.Foldable and Standard Containers in Empty Container Repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2013, pp. 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.07.005
22.
TheofanisS.BoileM.Empty Marine Container Logistics: Facts, Issues and Management Strategies. GeoJournal, Vol. 74, No. 1, 2009, p. 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9214-0
23.
ZhengJ. F.SunZ.GaoZ. Y.Empty Container Exchange Among Liner Carriers. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 83, 2015, pp. 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.09.007
ZhengJ. F.SunZ.ZhangF. J.Measuring the Perceived Container Leasing Prices in Liner Shipping Network Design with Empty Container Repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 94, 2016, pp. 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.08.001
MoonI.HongH.Repositioning of Empty Containers Using Both Standard and Foldable Containers. Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2016, pp. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.18
28.
ChenQ.LiuM.LiuX.Bike Fleet Allocation Models for Repositioning in Bike-Sharing Systems. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, Vol. 10, 2018, pp. 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/mits.2017.2776129
29.
JianS.ReyD.DixitV.An Integrated Supply-Demand Approach to Solving Optimal Relocations in Station-Based Carsharing Systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 19, 2019, pp. 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-018-9401-6
30.
ZhangJ.MengM.WangD.DuB.Allocation Strategies in a Dockless Bike Sharing System: A Community Structure-Based Approach. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1849471
