Building Information Modeling for Bridges and Structures: Outcomes and Lessons Learned from the Steel Bridge Industry

Abstract

The recent push to adopt building information modeling (BIM) for bridges and structures in the transportation industry has encountered major barriers owing to the lack of standardization. Unlike the building industry that has the National BIM Standard®–United States (NBIMS-US™) as a formal open platform standard and guide for the development of interoperable BIM software, the transportation industry does not currently have a similar open platform standard to enable the creation of interoperable BIM software to serve the needs of transportation stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of the research for one of the first use cases and development of data exchange requirements and model view definitions in adopting the open platform NBIMS-US applied to bridges and structures for the U.S. transportation industry. A subcommittee of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and the National Steel Bridge Alliance Steel Bridge Collaboration was formed to conduct a pilot study into the creation of information delivery manuals (IDMs) for steel bridges. This study served as pilot for the development of future IDMs in the transportation industry. As a result, the current IDM for Steel Bridge Detailing and Fabrication serves as the starting point of TPF-5(372) BIM for Bridges and Structures development of the Design to Fabrication model view definition. Finally, this study provided the outcomes and recommendations needed to expedite the development of IDMs for other use cases in the bridge and transportation industry.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Costin

Adibfar

Chen

S. S.

Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Transportation Infrastructure–Literature Review, Applications, Challenges, and Recommendations. Automation in Construction, Vol. 94, 2018, pp. 257–281.

Development of Interoperable Data Protocol for Integrated Bridge Project Delivery. PhD dissertation. University at Buffalo, NY, 2014.

National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). United States National Building Information Modeling Standard Version 1—Part 1: Overview, Principles, and Methodologies. The Northern American Chapter of buildingSMART International (bSI), 2007.

Chen

S. S.

Ali

Srikonda

Information Delivery Manual Elements for Highway Bridge Interoperable Data Protocols. The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 2013.

National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). About the National BIM Standard-United States. https://www.nationalbimstandard.org/about. Accessed June 8, 2019.

Chen

S. S.

Shirole

A. M.

Integration of Information and Automation Technologies in Bridge Engineering and Management: Extending State of the Art. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1976: 2–12.

Chen

S. S.

Tangirala

V.-K.

J.-W.

Shirole

A. M.

Sweeney

Accelerating the Design and Delivery of Bridges with 3D Bridge Information Modeling: Pilot Study of 3D-Centric Modeling Processes for Integrated Design and Construction of Highway Bridges. Report. University at Buffalo, NY, 2006.

Verma

K. V.

Siewert

T. A.

Beckmann

Integrated Bridge Project Delivery and Life Cycle Management. Proc., 1st South-East Asia IIW Congress, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, 2006.

Shirole

A. M.

Chen

Puckett

Bridge Information Modeling for the Life Cycle. Proceedings in International Bridge and Structure Management, Vol. 313, 2008.

10.

Shirole

A. M.

Riordan

T. J.

Chen

S. S.

Qiang

BrIM for Project Delivery and the Life-Cycle: State of the Art. Bridge Structures, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2009, pp. 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732480903143003.

11.

Ahn

I.-S.

Chen

S. S.

Qiang

Use of Bridge Information Modeling for Seismic Accelerated Bridge Construction. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.

12.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Advancing Steel and Concrete Bridge Technology to Improve Infrastructure Performance. Federal Grant. DTFH61-11-RA-00010. 2011.

13.

Chen

S. S.

Ali

Srikonda

Model View Definition Elements for Highway Bridge Interoperable Data Protocols. The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 2013.

14.

Koch

OpenBrIM: Community Driven Bridge Information Modeling. https://www.openbrim.org/www/brim. Accessed July 20, 2019.

15.

Chipman

Costin

Eastman

Grant

Liebich

Smith

Yang

Bridge Information Modeling Standardization Report. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2016.

16.

National Institute of Building Sciences. IFC Bridge Design to Construction Information Exchange (U.S.). National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.https://www.nibs.org/?page=bsa_bridge. Accessed July 20, 2019.

17.

Mlynarski

Standardized Format for Bridge and Structure Information Models. Report NCHRP 20-07, Task 377. Michael Baker International, Pittsburgh, PA, 2016.

18.

NCHRP. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Bridges and Structures. Transportation Pooled Fund Program. www.pooledfund.org/Details/Solicitation/1450. Accessed August 8, 2018.

19.

AASHTO Board of Directors. Adoption of Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) Schema as the Standard Data Schema for the Exchange of Electronic Engineering Data. Administrative Resolution AR-1-19, 2019. https://highways.transportation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/46/2019/10/Administrative-Resolution-AR-1-19-Adoption-of-Industry-Foundation-Classes-IFC-Schema-as-the-Standard-Data-Schema-for-the-Exchange-of-Electronic-Engineering-Data.pdf. Accessed October 19, 2019.

20.

Costin

Eastman

Need for Interoperability to Enable Seamless Information Exchanges in Smart and Sustainable Urban Systems. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2019, p. 04019008.

21.

Object Management Group (OMG). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). https://www.bpmn.org. Accessed June 29, 2019.

22.

Digital Building Laboratory (DBL). Cast-in-Place National BIM Standard. Georgia Institute of Technology. http://dcom.arch.gatech.edu/aci/. Accessed September 10, 2015.

23.

Digital Building Laboratory (DBL). AISC National BIM Standard. Georgia Institute of Technology. http://dcom.arch.gatech.edu/aisc/. Accessed September 10, 2015.

24.

Digital Building Laboratory (DBL). Precast Concrete BIM Standards. Georgia Institute of Technology. http://dcom.arch.gatech.edu/pcibim. Accessed September 10, 2015.

25.

Costin

A New Methodology for Interoperability of Heterogeneous Bridge Information Models. PhD dissertation. CEE, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2016.

26.

American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). AASHTO/NSBA Collaboration. 2020. https://www.aisc.org/nsba/design-and-estimation-resources/aashto-nsba-collaboration/. Accessed January 2, 2020.

27.

TPF-5(372) BIM for Bridges and Structures. https://www.bimforbridgesus.com/. Accessed January 2, 2020.