Impact of Specialized Hauling Vehicles and Emergency Vehicles on Bridge Load Rating

Abstract

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) mandated states to adopt specialized hauling vehicles (SHVs) and emergency vehicles (EVs) in 2013 and 2016, respectively, in the load rating of bridges. Both the AASHTO single-unit trucks (SUs) and EVs are specially configured so that they may result in high load effects and can adversely affect bridge load rating factors. This paper investigates the impacts of rating these vehicles on the states’ bridge load ratings. An extensive literature review of the states’ load rating policies is performed. To determine whether any state can possibly be exempted from the new load ratings for SUs and EVs for Interstate highway bridges, the load effects of various state legal vehicles are analyzed and compared with those of SUs and EVs. The results of the study indicate the inevitability of executing the new load rating analysis for SUs and EVs for the vast majority of states. Weigh-in-motion data are processed to screen the potential EV traffic fleeting on the highway, and the calibrated live load factors are proposed for EVs accordingly. The load effects are found to be smaller than those FHWA originally assigned, improving the rating factors. Lastly, this paper proposes a screening tool to help state agencies to convert the known rating factors to the rating factors of SUs and EVs so that the load rating work can be prioritized for the bridges that are vulnerable to SUs and EVs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Federal Highway Administration. Load Rating of Specialized Hauling Vehicles. FHWA Memorandum, Washington, D.C., 2013. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/loadrating/131115.cfm.

U.S. Congress. The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) (P.L. 114-94), 2015.

Federal Highway Administration. Load Rating for the FAST Act’s Emergency Vehicles. FHWA Memorandum, Washington, D.C., 2016. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/loadrating/161103.cfm.

Sivakumar

NCHRP Report 575: Legal Truck Loads and AASHTO Legal Loads for Posting. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Questions and Answers – Load Rating of Specialized Hauling Vehicles. FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2014. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/loadrating/shv_qa.pdf.

Mlynarski

Wassef

W. G.

Nowak

A. S.

NCHRP Report 700: A Comparison of AASHTO Bridge Load Rating Methods. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.

Lou

Gao

Nassif

Reddy

Reliability Assessment of Steel Bridges for Specialized Hauling Vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2019. 2673: 391–403.

FHWA Office of Operations, Information: Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) Truck Size and Weight Provisions, Washington, D.C., February 24, 2016. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/Freight/pol_plng_finance/policy/fastact/tswprovisions/index.htm.

Federal Highway Administration. Compilation of Existing State Truck Size and Weight Limit Laws. Report to Congress. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., May 2015.

10.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Questions and Answers – Load Rating for the FAST Act’s Emergency Vehicles. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2018. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/loadrating/fast1410_qa.pdf.

11.

Ghosn

NCHRP Project 20-07/Task 410: Load Rating for the FAST Act Emergency Vehicles EV-2 and EV-3. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2019.

12.

U.S. Census Bureau. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf.

13.

Fire Apparatus Manufacturers’ Association. Emergency Vehicle Size and Weight Guide. Fire Apparatus Manufacturers’ Association, Ocala, FL, 2017. https://www.fama.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/1514564588_5a466bec19c41.pdf.

14.

Wassef

W. G.

Kulicki

J. M.

Nassif

Mertz

Nowak

A. S.

NCHRP Web Document 201: Calibration of AASHTO LRFD Concrete Bridge Design Specifications for Serviceability. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014. http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/170575.aspx.

15.

Gindy

Nassif

Multiple Presence Statistics Based on 10 Years of Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2028: 125–135.

16.

Zokaie

Imbsen

R. A.

Osterkamp

T. A.

Distribution of Wheel Loads on Highway Bridges. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1991. 1290: 119–126.

17.

AASHTO 2018 Interim. The Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 3rd ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2018.

18.

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2017.