Modeling Social Distance and Activity-Travel Decision Similarity to Identify Influential Agents in Social Networks and Geographic Space and Its Application to Travel Mode Choice Analysis

Abstract

Because humans are social beings, people are members of social networks and interact with other members. As a result of social interaction, people can be influenced by the behavior of others. The present study addresses conformity behavior in activity-travel decisions, implying that in making such decisions people mimic the behavior of other members of their social networks. The presence of conformity behavior in social networks implies that sustainable behavior can be dispersed through networks. Therefore, knowing which people in a network are influential can help make a sustainable transportation policy more effective. In particular, information about the topology of social networks and geographical distribution can help maximize the policy’s spill-over effects in social and geographic spaces. This study suggests a framework to locate influential agents in relation to activity-travel decisions using three procedures: (1) estimating social distance associated with similarity in activity-travel decisions, (2) identifying influential agents by measuring centralities, and (3) exploring the spatial and activity-travel characteristics of the influential agents. The suggested framework is applied using the travel mode choices of people who had recently taken trips by road beside/alongside the Han River in Seoul, South Korea.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Korea Transport Emission Management System. Korea (NIR) GHG Emission. https://www.kotems.or.kr/app_us/kotems/forward?pageUrl=kotems/ptl/emission/internal/KotemsPtlEmissionInternalEmissionSectorLs&topmenu=02&leftmenu=02_d2. Accessed March 20, 2020.

Carrasco

J. A.

Miller

E. J.

Exploring the Propensity to Perform Social Activities: A Social Network Approach. Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2006, pp. 463–480.

Frei

Axhausen

K. W.

Ohnmacht

Mobilities and Social Network Geography: Size and Spatial Dispersion - Case Study Zurich. In Mobilities and Inequality ( Ohnmacht

Maksim

Bergman

M. M.

, eds.), Farnham, UK, Ashgate, 2009, pp. 97–119.

Ohnmacht

Qualitative Interviews on the Formation and Maintenance of Social Networks as Foundation for Quantitative Survey Instruments. In Social Networks and Travel Behaviour ( Kowald

Axhausen

K. W.

eds.), Farnham, UK, Ashgate, 2015, pp. 31–50.

Van den Berg

Arentze

T. A.

Timmermans

H. J. P.

Size and Composition of Ego-Centered Social Networks and Their Effect on Geographic Distance and Contact Frequency. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2135: 1–9.

Kim

Rasouli

Timmermans

H. J. P.

Social Networks, Social Influence and Activity-Travel Behavior: A Review of Models and Empirical Evidence. Transport Reviews, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2018, pp. 499–523.

Manski

C. F.

Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60, No. 3, 1993, pp. 531–542.

Brock

W. A.

Durlauf

S. N.

Discrete Choice with Social Interactions. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 68, No. 2, 2001, pp. 235–260.

Akerlof

G. A.

Social Distance and Social Decisions. Econometrica, Vol. 65, 1997, pp. 1005–1027.

10.

Bonguna

Pastor-Satorras

Diaz-Guilera

Arenas

Models of Social Networks Based on Social Distance Attachment. Physical Review E, Vol. 70, No. 5, 2004, p. 056122.

11.

Reagans

Preferences, Identity, and Competition: Predicting Tie Strength from Demographic Data. Management Science, Vol. 51, No. 9, 2005, pp. 1374–1383.

12.

Aral

Walker

Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks. Science, Vol. 337, No. 6092, 2012, pp. 337–341.

13.

Struben

Sterman

J. D.

Transition Challenges for Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Transportation Systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1070–1097.

14.

Wasserman

Faust

Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1994.

15.

Páez

Scott

D. M.

Social Influence on Travel Behavior: A Simulation Example of the Decision to Telecommute. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2007, pp. 647–665.

16.

Páez

Scott

D. M.

Volz

A Discrete-Choice Approach to Modeling Social Influence on Individual Decision Making. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1055–1069.

17.

Hackney

Integration of Social Networks in a Large Scale Travel Behavior Microsimulation. PhD thesis. ETH Zurich, 2009.

18.

Hackney

Marchal

A Coupled Multi-Agent Microsimulation of Social Interactions and Transportation Behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2011, pp. 296–309.

19.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2001, pp. 415–444.

20.

Lazrasfeld

P. F.

Merton

R. K.

Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and Control in Modern Society ( Berger

, ed.), New York, Van Nostrand, 1954, pp. 18–66.

21.

Mok

Wellman

Basu

Did Distance Matter before the Internet? Interpersonal Contact and Support in the 1970s. Social Networks, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2007, pp. 430–461.

22.

Arentze

T. A.

Timmermans

H. J. P.

Social Networks, Social Interaction, and Activity-Travel Behavior: A Framework for Microsimulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1012–1027.

23.

Arentze

Van den Berg

Timmermans

H. J. P.

Modeling Social Networks in Geographic Space: Approach and Empirical Application. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1101–1120.

24.

Arentze

T. A.

Kowald

Axhausen

K. W.

An Agent-Based Random-Utility-Maximization Model to Generate Social Networks with Transitivity in Geographic Space. Social Networks, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2013, pp. 451–459.

25.

Kowald

Arentze

T. A.

Axhausen

K. W.

Individuals’ Spatial Social Network Choice: Model-Based Analysis of Leisure-Contact Selection. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2015, pp. 857–869.

26.

Sharmeen

Arentze

T. A.

Timmermans

H. J. P.

Predicting Tie Formation and Dynamics for Population-wide Social Networks. Transportation, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2015, pp. 733–751.

27.

Huston

T. L.

Levinger

Interpersonal Attraction and Relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1978, pp. 115–156.

28.

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Salomon

Redmond

L. S.

Understanding the Demand for Travel: It’s Not Purely “Derived.”

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2001, pp. 355–380.

29.

Atasoy

Glerum

Bierlaire

Attitudes towardsT Mode Choice in Switzerland. disP – The Planning Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2013, pp. 101–117.

30.

Daziano

R. A.

Bolduc

Incorporating Pro-Environmental Preferences towards Green Automobile Technologies through a Bayesian Hybrid Choice Model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2013, pp. 74–106.

31.

Dugunji

E. R.

Gulyás

Sociodynamic Discrete Choice on Networks in Space: Impacts of Agent Heterogeneity on Emergent Outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1028–1054.

32.

Goetzke

Weinberger

Separating Contextual from Endogenous Effects in Automobile Ownership Models. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1032–1046.

33.

Scott

D. M.

Dam

Paez

Wilton

R. D.

Investigating the Effects of Social Influence on the Choice to Telework. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1016–1031.

34.

Axsen

Kurani

K. S.

Interpersonal Influence within Car Buyers’ Social Networks: Applying Five Perspectives to Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle Drivers. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1047–1065.

35.

Sherwin

Chatterjee

Jain

An Exploration of the Importance of Social Influence in the Decision to Start Bicycling in England. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 68, 2014, pp. 32–45.

36.

Maness

Cirillo

An Indirect Latent Informational Conformity Social Influence Choice Model: Formulation and Case Study. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 93, 2016, pp. 75–101.

37.

Kim

Rasouli

Timmermans

H. J. P.

Investigating Heterogeneity in Social Influence by Social Distance in Car-Sharing Decisions under Uncertainty: A Regret-Minimizing Hybrid Choice Model Framework Based on Sequential Stated Adaptation Experiments. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 85, 2017, pp. 47–63.

38.

Dugundji

E. R.

Walker

Discrete Choice with Social and Spatial Network Interdependencies: An Empirical Example using Mixed Generalized Extreme Value Models with Field and Panel Effects. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1921: 70–78.

39.

Goetzke

Network Effects in Public Transit Use: Evidence from a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model for New York. Urban Studies, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2008, pp. 407–417.

40.

Goetzke

Rave

Bicycle Use in Germany: Explaining Differences between Municipalities with Social Network Effects. Urban Studies, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2011, pp. 427–437.

41.

Carrasco

J. A.

Hogan

Wellman

Miller

E. J.

Collecting Social Network Data to Study Social Activity-Travel Behavior: An Egocentric Approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 961–980.

42.

Frei

Ohnmacht

Egocentric Networks in Zurich: Quantitative Survey Development, Data Collection and Analysis. In Social Networks and Travel Behaviour ( Kowald

Axhausen

K. W.

, eds.), Farnham, UK, Ashgate, 2015, pp. 51–98.

43.

Walker

Ehlers

Banerjee

Dugundji

E. R.

Correcting for Endogeneity in Behavioral Choice Models with Social Influence Variables. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2011, pp. 362–374.