Full-Scale Laboratory Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Subgrade Soil Stabilization Practices for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements Patching Applications

Abstract

Adequate quality of subgrade under patched areas can extend the service life of concrete pavements and reduce their maintenance costs. In this study, the performance of various subgrade stabilization scenarios was evaluated and compared with each other in a full-scale laboratory-based setup. For this purpose, a test box with the footprint of 6 × 6 ft and a height of 4 ft was constructed using C steel channels. The test box was used to investigate the effects of various types of soil stabilization methods, such as chemical (cement) stabilization, use of aggregate base course (ABC), geogrid (GG) and geotextile (GT) with ABC, GT with cement-stabilized soil, GT with in-situ compacted soil, flowable fill, and lean concrete. The test results showed that all stabilization techniques successfully improved the performance of the subgrade layer by decreasing the deformation under the fatigue loading representing a single axle load of 9,000 lbf/tire. The use of GT with aggregate-based layers was found to significantly reduce the amount of settlement. Subgrade layers stabilized with GG also experienced lower values of deformations compared with the unmodified (control) section. However, GG was not as effective as GT. The use of cement-treated aggregate and lean concrete reduced the deformations to negligible levels.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behnood

Soil and Clay Stabilization with Calcium- and Non-Calcium-Based Additives: A State-of-the-Art Review of Challenges, Approaches and Techniques. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 17, 2018, pp. 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.08.002.

Petry

T. M.

Little

D. N.

Review of Stabilization of Clays and Expansive Soils in Pavements and Lightly Loaded Structures—History, Practice, and Future. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2002, pp. 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(447).

Peethamparan

Olek

Diamond

Physicochemical Behavior of Cement Kiln Dust-Treated Kaolinite Clay. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2059: 80–88.

Peethamparan

Olek

Lovell

Influence of Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Cement Kiln Dusts (CKDs) on Their Hydration Behavior and Potential Suitability for Soil Stabilization. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2008, pp. 803–815. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.011.

Ghadir

Ranjbar

Clayey Soil Stabilization using Geopolymer and Portland Cement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 188, 2018, pp. 361–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.207.

Cuelho

E. V.

Perkins

S. W.

Geosynthetic Subgrade Stabilization – Field Testing and Design Method Calibration. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 10, 2017, pp. 22–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.10.002.

Abu-Farsakh

Hanandeh

Mohammad

Chen

Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforced/Stabilized Paved Roads Built over Soft Soil under Cyclic Plate Loads. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2016, pp. 845–853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.009.

Hufenus

Rueegger

Banjac

Mayor

Springman

S. M.

Brönnimann

Full-Scale Field Tests on Geosynthetic Reinforced Unpaved Roads on Soft Subgrade. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2006, pp. 21–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.06.002.

Singh

Trivedi

Shukla

S. K.

Strength Enhancement of the Subgrade Soil of Unpaved Road with Geosynthetic Reinforcement Layers. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 19, 2019, pp. 54–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.01.007.

10.

Zornberg

J. G.

Azevedo

Sikkema

Odgers

Geosynthetics with Enhanced Lateral Drainage Capabilities in Roadway Systems. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 12, 2017, pp. 85–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.008.

11.

Perkins

S. W.

Mechanical Response of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Flexible Pavements. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 6, No. 5, 1999, pp. 347–382. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.6.0157.

12.

Tingle

Jersey

Cyclic Plate Load Testing of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Unbound Aggregate Roads. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1936: 60–69.

13.

White

Becker

Vennapusa

Dunn

White

Assessing Soil Stiffness of Stabilized Pavement Foundations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2335: 99–109.