Analyzing the Relationship between Road Safety Pillars and the World Health Organization Member States’ Mortality Rate using Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Abstract

Road deaths phenomenon suggests the development of studies that consider the complex causal relationship between the factors that influence it at the compatible level with the definition of road safety policies. This paper analyzes the influence of 48 road safety performance indicators on the mortality rate of 175 World Health Organization Member States in 2016. Structural equation models were proposed to evaluate the proposition and use of latent variables that represent five major road safety policy areas and the influence on mortality rates. The proposed model structure indicated that management has a strategic role in public policies, having an indirect influence on reducing the mortality rate through safe vehicles, user safety, and safe roads and mobility. The results indicated that policies aimed at encouraging users’ safe behavior were the ones that had the greatest influence in reducing road deaths followed by policies in safer vehicles, road safety management, safer roads and mobility, and post-crash response.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.

Lord

Persaud

B. N.

Estimating the Safety Performance of Urban Road Transportation Networks. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2004, pp. 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00069-1.

Mannering

F. L.

Bhat

C. R.

Methodological Frontier and Future Directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 2014, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2013.09.001.

Gomes

M. J. T. L.

Cunto

Silva

A. R.

Geographically Weighted Negative Binomial Regression Applied to Zonal Level Safety Performance Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.011.

Highway Safety Manual User Guide National Cooperative Highway Research Program 17-50 . AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2011.6058799.

Barbosa

Cunto

Bezerra

Nodari

Jacques

M. A.

Safety Performance Models for Urban Intersections in Brazil. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 70, 2014, pp. 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.008.

Hauer

The Art of Regression Modeling in Road Safety. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015.

Hauer

Statistical Road Safety Modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004. 1897: 81–87.

Lee

J. Y.

Chung

J. H.

Son

Analysis of Traffic Accident Size for Korean Highway using Structural Equation Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1955–1963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.006.

10.

Chen

C. F.

Chen

C. W.

Speeding for Fun? Exploring the Speeding Behavior of Riders of Heavy Motorcycles using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Psychological Flow Theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, pp. 983–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.025.

11.

Al-Mahameed

F. J.

Qin

Schneider

R. J.

Shaon

M. R. R.

Analyzing Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crashes at the Corridor Level: Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 308–318.

12.

Schumacker

R. E.

Lomax

R. G.

A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. Routledge, Ohio, 2004, p.536.

13.

Chen

Wang

Benchmarking Road Safety Performance: Identifying a Meaningful Reference (Best-in-Class). Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 86, 2016, pp. 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.018.

14.

Tingvall

The Swedish “Vision Zero” and How Parliamentary Approval Was Obtained. Land Transport Safety Authority, New Zealand Police, Wellington, New Zealand, 1998, pp. 6–8.

15.

Wegman

Aarts

Bax

Advancing Sustainable Safety. National Road Safety Outlook for The Netherlands for 2005–2020. Safety Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2008, pp. 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.013.

16.

Belin

M. Å.

Tillgren

Vedung

Vision Zero - A Road Safety Policy Innovation. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2012, pp. 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2011.635213.

17.

Wegman

Aarts

Advancing Sustainable Safety - National Road Safety Outlook for 2005–2020. Safety Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2008, pp. 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.013

18.

International Transport Forum. Zero Road Deaths and Serious Injuries: Leading a Paradigm Shift to a Safe System. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2016.

19.

Welle

Bray Sharpin

Adriazola-Steil

Soames

Shotten

Bose

Bhatt

Alveano

Obelheiro

Imamoglu

Sustainable & Safe: A Vision and Guidance for Zero Road Deaths. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., 2018, p. 94.

20.

International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group. Road Safety Annual Report 2016. OECD/ITF, 2016. p. 562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/irtad-2016-en

21.

Weijermars

Wegman

Ten Years of Sustainable Safety in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2213: 1–8.

22.

World Health Organization. Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011–2020. WHO, Geneva, 2011.

23.

Pearl

The Art and Science of Cause and Effect. Causality, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009, p. 464.

24.

Little

T. D.

Card

N. A.

Bovaird

J. A.

Preacher

K. J.

Crandall

C. S.

Structural Equation Modeling of Mediation and Moderation with Contextual Factors. In Modeling Contextual Effects in Longitudinal Studies ( Little

T. D.

Bovaird

J. A.

Card

N. A.

, eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, 2007.

25.

Hair

J. F.

Babin

Money

Samouel

Fundamentos de Métodos de Pesquisa Em Administração. Bookman: São Paulo, Brazil, 2005, p. 472.

26.

Zhou

Romero

S. B.

Qin

An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Pedestrians’ Violating Crossing Behavior using Structural Equation Modeling. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 95, 2016, pp. 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.009.

27.

Rosli

Ambak

Daniel

B. D.

Sanik

M. E.

Structural Equation Modelling in Behavioral Intention to Use Safety Helmet Reminder System. Proc., MATEC Web of Conferences, Melaka, Malaysa, Vol. 47, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164703002.

28.

Nikolaou

Dimitriou

Antoniou

Global Road Traffic Fatalities: Explanatory Analysis Based on Alternative Structural Equations Modeling Approaches. Presented at 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2019, p. 15.

29.

Nachtigall

Kroehne

Funke

Steyer

(Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modeling, in: Methods of Psychological Research Online. Methods of Psychological Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2003, pp. 1–22.

30.

Schuenemeyer

J. H.

Murtagh

Heck

Multivariate Data Analysis. Technometrics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2006, p. 393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556165.