This study attempted to identify the challenges in testing and characterization of the post-crack behavior of structural fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) for use in pavements. The benefits and challenges associated with three different FRC testing methods, ASTM C1550, C1399, and C1609 were discussed and compared. Two new parameters, post-crack toughness, and post-crack performance (PCP) index were proposed to characterize the post-crack behavior of FRC. These parameters are a function of the fibers’ contribution and are minimally influenced by the properties of the non-fiber ingredients of concrete such as aggregates, cement, and water. A laboratory study conducted on 10 different types of FRCs validated the applicability of the two proposed new parameters. Transportation agencies can use the PCP index to shortlist effective fibers and post-crack toughness to determine fiber dosage. The study found that fibers with irregular cross-section or geometry and high lateral stiffness provide a high post-crack contribution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MulheronM.KevernJ. T.RupnowT. D.Laboratory Fatigue and Toughness Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2508: 39–47.
2.
ACI Commitee 544. State-of-the-Art Report on Fiber Reinforced Concrete. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 2009.
3.
RoeslerJ. R.LangeD.UlreichG.Fracture Behavior of Full-Scale, Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Slabs. Final Report for W.R. Grace, Inc. University of Illinois, Urbana, 2003, p. 124.
4.
RollingsR. S.Field Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Airfield Pavements. DOT/FAA/PM-86/26. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., 1986.
5.
BarmanM.Joint Performance Characterization of Bonded Concrete Overlay. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 2014.
6.
BarmanM.HansenB.Comparison of Performances of Structural Fibers and Development of a Specification for Using Structural Fibers in Thin Concrete Overlays. Final Report. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2018.
7.
VandenbosscheJ. M.LiZ.DufallaN.Bonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt Mechanistic-Empirical Design Procedure. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 18, 2016, pp. 1004–1015.
8.
BordelonA.RoeslerJ. R.Design with Fiber Reinforcement for Thin Concrete Overlays Bonded to Asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 4, 2012, pp. 430–435.
9.
RoeslerJ. R.BordelonA.IoannidesA.BeyerM.WangD.Design and Concrete Material Requirements for Ultra-Thin Whitetopping. Publication FHWA-ICT-08-016. Illinois Center for Transportation, 2008.
10.
IssaM. A.Effect of Early-Age Concrete Elastic Properties on Fatigue Damage in PCC Pavements Containing Fibers. Publication FHWA-ICT-17-019. Illinois Center for Transportation, 2017.
11.
ZolloR. F.Collated Fibrillated Polypropylene Fibers in FRC. In SP-81, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., 1984, pp. 397–409.
ASTM, C 1116. Standard Specification for Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2015.
14.
Portland Cement Association. Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, 15th ed.PCA, Skokie, Ill., 2015.
15.
BeckettD.Comparative Tests on Plain, Fabric Reinforced and Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Ground Slabs. Concrete, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1990, pp. 43–45.
16.
FalknerH.HuangZ.TeutschM.Comparative Study of Plain and Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Ground Slabs. Concrete International, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1995, pp. 45–51.
17.
KimM.BordelonA.Age-Dependent Flexural Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Used in Thin Overlays. Proc., 11th International Conference on Concrete Pavements (ICCP), San Antonio, Tex., 2016.
18.
LudirdjaD.YougnJ.Synthetic Fiber Reinforcement for Concrete. Champaign, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Labratories, 1992.
19.
ASTM-C1550 -12a. Standard Test Method for Flexural Toughness of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using centrally Laoded Round Panel). ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2012.
20.
ASTM-C1399 -12a. Standard Test Method for Obtaining Average Residual-Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2012.
21.
ASTMC 78. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2016.
22.
ASTM-C1609. Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam With Third-Point Loading). ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2010.
23.
BanthiaN.TrottierJ.Test Methods for Flexural Toughness Characterization of Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Some Concerns and a Proposition. American Concrete Institute ACI Materials Journal. V. 92, No. 1, pp. 48–57.
24.
MulheronM.KevernJ. TRupnowT. D.Laboratory Fatigue and Toughness Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2508: 39–47.
25.
ASTM C143/C143M-05. Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic Cement Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2005.
26.
ASTM C231/C231M-17a. Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2017.
27.
ASTM C39/C39M-18. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2018.
28.
MahadikS. A.KamaneS. K.LandeA. C.Effect of Steel Fibers on Compressive and Flexural Strength on Concrete. International Journal of Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2014, pp. 388–392.
