Pedestrian Injury Severities in Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes and the Partial Proportional Odds Logit Model: Accounting for Age Difference

Abstract

This study investigates factors that significantly contribute to the severity of pedestrian injuries resulting from pedestrian-vehicle crashes. Multinomial logit (MNL) models, mixed logit (ML) models, and ordered logit/probit models have been widely used in modeling crash injury severity, including pedestrian injury severity in pedestrian-vehicle crashes. However, both MNL and ML models treat injury severity levels as non-ordered, ignoring the inherent hierarchical nature of crash injury severities, and the data used in ordered logit models need to be strictly subjected to the proportional odds (PO) assumption. In this study, a partial proportional odds (PPO) logit model approach is employed to explore the issues of pedestrian safety associated with each age group: young (aged under 24), middle-aged (aged 25–55), and older pedestrians (aged over 55). Data used in this study are police-reported pedestrian crash data collected from 2007 to 2014 in North Carolina. A variety of motorist, pedestrian, environmental, and roadway characteristics are inspected. Results from likelihood ratio tests statistically show the better performance of developing separate injury severity models for each age group compared with estimating a single model utilizing all data. Relevant parameter estimates and associated marginal effects are used to interpret the results, followed by recommendations made in the concluding section.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Thomas

Vann

Levitt

. North Carolina Pedestrian Crash Trends and Facts 2011–2015. Project RP 2017-42. The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation, Raleigh, N.C., 2018.

Loo

B. P.

Tsui

K. L

. Pedestrian Injuries in an Ageing Society: Insights from Hospital Trauma Registry. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1196–1201.

Dommes

Cavallo

Dubuisson

J. B.

Tournier

Vienne

. Crossing a Two-way Street: Comparison of Young and Old Pedestrians. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 50, 2014, pp. 27–34.

Niebuhr

Junge

Rosen

. Pedestrian Injury Risk and the Effect of Age. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 86, 2016, pp. 121–128.

Kim

Ulfarsson

G. F

. Traffic Safety in an Aging Society: Analysis of Older Pedestrian Crashes. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, 2018, pp. 1–10.

Kim

J. K.

Ulfarsson

G. F.

Shankar

V. N.

Kim

. Age and Pedestrian Injury Severity in Motor-vehicle Crashes: A Heteroskedastic Logit Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.005.

Kim

J. K.

Ulfarsson

G. F.

Shankar

V. N.

Mannering

F. L

. A Note on Modeling Pedestrian-injury Severity in Motor-vehicle Crashes with the Mixed Logit Model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1751–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.016.

Dai

Identifying Clusters and Risk Factors of Injuries in Pedestrian-vehicle Crashes in a GIS Environment. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2012, pp. 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.005.

Aziz

H. A.

Ukkusuri

S. V.

Hasan

. Exploring the Determinants of Pedestrian-Vehicle Crash Severity in New York City. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 1298–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.034.

10.

Himanen

Kulmala

. An Application of Logit Models in Analysing the Behaviour of Pedestrians and Car Drivers on Pedestrian Crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1988, pp. 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(88)90003-6.

11.

Shankar

Mannering

. An Exploratory Multinomial Logit Analysis of Single-vehicle Motorcycle Accident Severity. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1996, pp. 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(96)00010-2.

12.

McFadden

Train

. Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2000, pp. 447–470. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678603.

13.

Tay

Choi

Kattan

Khan

. A Multinomial Logit Model of Pedestrian-vehicle Crash Severity. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2011, pp. 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2010.497547.

14.

Quddus

M. A.

Wang

Ison

S. G

. Road Traffic Congestion and Crash Severity: Econometric Analysis Using Ordered Response Models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2009, pp. 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000044.

15.

Zhou

Z. P.

Liu

Y. S.

Wang

Zhang

. Multinomial Logit Model of Pedestrian Crossing Behaviors at Signalized Intersections. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Vol. 2013, No. 3, 2013, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/172726.

16.

Chen

Fan

W. D

. A Multinomial Logit Model of Pedestrian-vehicle Crash Severity in North Carolina. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2018. Vol. 8, No. 1, 2019, pp. 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.10.001.

17.

Milton

J. C.

Shankar

V. N.

Mannering

F. L

. Highway Accident Severities and the Mixed Logit Model: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2008, pp. 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.006.

18.

Malyshkina

N.V.

Mannering

F. L

. Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Highway Design Exceptions on the Frequency and Severity of Vehicle Accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, 2010, pp. 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.013.

19.

Chen

. Injury Severities of Truck Drivers in Single- and Multi-vehicle Accidents on Rural Highways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1677–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.026.

20.

Huang

Seraneeprakarn

Shankar

. A Hierarchical Mixed Logit Model of Hybrid Involved Crash Severities. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016, No. 16-5162.

21.

Behnood

Mannering

F. L

. An Empirical Assessment of the Effects of Economic Recessions on Pedestrian-injury Crashes Using Mixed and Latent-class Models. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 12, 2016, pp. 1–17.

22.

Cerwick

D. M.

Gkritza

Shaheed

M. S.

Hans

. A Comparison of the Mixed Logit and Latent Class Methods for Crash Severity Analysis. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 3, 2014, pp. 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2014.09.002.

23.

Savolainen

P. T.

Mannering

F. L.

Lord

Quddus

M. A

. The Statistical Analysis of Highway Crash-injury Severities: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1666–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.025.

24.

Peterson

Harrell

. Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Response Variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), Vol. 39, No. 2, 1990, pp. 205–217. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347760.

25.

Wang

Abdel-Aty

. Analysis of Left-turn Crash Injury Severity by Conflicting Pattern Using Partial Proportional Odds Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1674–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.001.

26.

Rifaat

S. M.

Tay

De Barros

. Severity of Motorcycle Crashes in Calgary. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 49, 2012, pp. 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.025.

27.

Gong

Fan

Washing

E. M

. Modeling Severity of Single Vehicle Run-off-road Crashes in Rural Areas: Model Comparison and Selection. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2016, pp. 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0449.

28.

Pour-Rouholamin

Jalayer

. Analyzing the Severity of Motorcycle Crashes in North Carolina Using Highway Safety Information Systems Data. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal, Vol. 86, No. 10, 2016, p. 45. http://libproxy.clemson.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1832785066?accountid=6167. Accessed July 15, 2018.

29.

Pour

A. T.

Moridpour

Tay

Rajabifard

. A Partial Proportional Odds Model for Pedestrian Crashes at Mid-blocks in Melbourne Metropolitan Area. MATEC Web Conferences, Vol. 81, 2016, p. 02020. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20168102020.

30.

Fan

. Modelling the Severity of Pedestrian Injury in Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes in North Carolina: A Partial Proportional Odds Logit Model Approach. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 2018, 2018, pp. 1–22.

31.

Sasidharan

Menendez

. Partial Proportional Odds Model—An Alternate Choice for Analyzing Pedestrian Crash Injury Severities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 72, 2014, pp. 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.025.

32.

Mannering

F. L.

Shankar

Bhat

C. R

. Unobserved Heterogeneity and the Statistical Analysis of Highway Accident Data. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 11, 2016, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001.

33.

Derr

Ordinal Response Modeling with the LOGISTIC Procedure. SAS Global Forum, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., 2013, pp. 1–20. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings13/446-2013.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2018.

34.

Eluru

Bhat

C. R.

Hensher

D. A.

A Mixed Generalized Ordered Response Model for Examining Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injury Severity Level in Traffic Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1033–1054.

35.

Wooldridge

J. M.

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2010.

36.

Washington

S. P.

Karlaftis

M. G.

Mannering

. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.

37.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Time of Day and Demographic Perspective of Fatal Alcohol-impaired-driving Crashes. Report No. DOT HS 811 523. US Department of Transportation, 2011.

38.

Deery

H. A.

Hazard and Risk Perception among Young Novice Drivers. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1999, pp. 225–236.

39.

Jonah

B. A.

Dawson

N. E

. Youth and Risk: Age Differences in Risky Driving, Risk Perception, and Risk Utility. Alcohol, Drugs & Driving, Vol. 3, No. 3–4, 1987, pp. 13–29.

40.

Blockey

P. N.

Hartley

L. R

. Aberrant Driving Behaviour: Errors and Violations. Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 9, 1995, pp. 1759–1771.

41.

Jonah

B. A.

Age Differences in Risky Driving. Health Education Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1990, pp. 139–149.

42.

Zajac

S. S.

Ivan

J. N

. Factors Influencing Injury Severity of Motor Vehicle-Crossing Pedestrian Crashes in Rural Connecticut. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2003, pp. 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00013-1.

43.

Lee

Abdel-Aty

. Comprehensive Analysis of Vehicle-Pedestrian Crashes at Intersections in Florida. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2005, pp. 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.019.

44.

Mueller

B. A.

Rivara

F. P.

Bergman

A. B

. Urban-Rural Location and the Risk of Dying in a Pedestrian-vehicle Collision. The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1988, pp. 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198801000-00013.

45.

Montella

Aria

D’Ambrosio

Mauriello

. Data-mining Techniques for Exploratory Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2237: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.3141/2237-12.

46.

Mohamed

M. G.

Saunier

Miranda-Moreno

L. F.

Ukkusuri

S. V

. A Clustering Regression Approach: A Comprehensive Injury Severity Analysis of Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes in New York, US and Montreal, Canada. Safety Science, Vol. 54, 2013, pp. 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.11.001.