Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on the Adoption of Electric Bicycles in British Columbia

Abstract

Electric-assist bicycles (e-bikes) are an emerging mode of transportation that offers a sustainable alternative to automobile use in urban areas. Past research on e-bike adoption has focused on user perspectives. Understanding other stakeholder perspectives is also essential to implementing effective e-bike policy. The objectives of this research are to identify alignments and misalignments in perspectives on e-bike adoption across industry stakeholders in British Columbia (BC), including e-bike retailers, manufacturers, cycling coalitions, and government agencies, and to provide recommendations for e-bike policy that account for those perspectives. An online survey was distributed to industry stakeholders to examine perceived barriers to adoption, expected impacts of adoption, and effects of policy on adoption. Questions about regulations discriminated between five e-bike types: pedal-assist, throttle-assist, scooter-style, electric recumbents, and enclosed electric recumbents. Results indicate strong agreement among industry stakeholders that scooter-style e-bikes require separate and additional regulation from other types of e-bikes and from existing regulation in BC. In contrast, there was misalignment in the expected mode shift resulting from e-bike adoption, with government agencies least optimistic about diversion of automobile trips. Industry stakeholders broadly agreed on the need for speed regulation and viewed higher speeds as one of the least important benefits of e-bikes, which contrasts with past research on user perspectives. Policy recommendations include reclassifying scooter-style e-bikes, rebate or tax programs to reduce e-bike costs, further research on optimal e-bike speed limits, and continued support for improvements in general cycling infrastructure (a top priority for industry and user stakeholders).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

City of Vancouver. Transportation 2040 Plan: A Transportation Vision for the City of Vancouver. Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2012.

TransLink. Regional Transportation Strategy Strategic Framework. New Westminster, B.C., Canada, 2013.

Mason

Fulton

McDonald

A Global High Shift Cycling Scenario: The Potential for Dramatically Increasing Bicycle and E-Bike Use in Cities around the World, with Estimated Energy, CO2, and Cost Impacts. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy, Davis, Calif., 2015.

Fishman

Cherry

E-Bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research. Transport Reviews, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2016, pp. 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907.

MacArthur

Dill

Person

Electric Bikes in North America: Results of an Online Survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2468: 123–130.

Flavelle

E-Bikes Face Uphill Climb | The Star. thestar.com, Accessed August 1, 2014.

Shore

E-Bike Sales Accelerating as Riders Seek an Added Spark for Hilly Routes. Vancouver Sun, November 26, 2016.

Rose

E-Bikes and Urban Transportation: Emerging Issues and Unresolved Questions. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2012, pp. 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9328-y.

Dill

Rose

Electric Bikes and Transportation Policy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2314: 1–6.

10.

MacArthur

Kobel

Regulations of E-Bikes in North America: A Policy Review. Publication NITC-RR-564. National Institute for Transportation and Communities, Portland, Ore., 2014.

11.

Lamy

Electric Bike 2000 Project. Publication TP 13732E. Transportation Development Centre, Transport Canada, Montréal, Canada, 2001.

12.

Wolf

Seebauer

Technology Adoption of Electric Bicycles: A Survey among Early Adopters. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 69, 2014, pp. 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.007.

13.

Jin

Zhou

Wang

Estimating Cycleway Capacity and Bicycle Equivalent Unit for Electric Bicycles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 77, 2015, pp. 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.013.

14.

Hatzopoulou

Miller

E. J.

Institutional Integration for Sustainable Transportation Policy in Canada. Transport Policy, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2008, pp. 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.12.002.

15.

Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. Electric Bikes. Vehicle Registration. https://www.icbc.com/vehicle-registration/specialty-vehicles/Low-powered-vehicles/Pages/Electric-bikes.aspx. Accessed July 11, 2018.

16.

Government of Canada, Legislative Services Branch, Consolidated Federal Laws of Canada. Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations. http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/c.r.c.,_c._1038/FullText.html. Accessed July 25, 2018.

17.

TransLink. Bikes on Buses. https://www.translink.ca/Rider-Guide/Bikes-on-Transit/Bikes-on-Buses.aspx. Accessed July 11, 2018.

18.

BC Transit. Bike Racks. https://bctransit.com/skeena/riderinfo/bike-racks-and-lockers. Accessed July 12, 2018.

19.

Statistics Canada. 2016 Census Profile. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2017.

20.

Kroesen

To What Extent Do E-Bikes Substitute Travel by Other Modes? Evidence from the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 53, 2017, pp. 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.036.

21.

Edge

Dean

Cuomo

Keshav

Exploring E-Bikes as a Mode of Sustainable Transport: A Temporal Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of a Sample of Novice Riders in a Canadian City. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12456.

22.

Jin

Empirical Analysis of Speeding Behavior and Determining Speed Limits for Electric Bicycles. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.

23.

Foxon

T. J.

A Coevolutionary Framework for Analysing a Transition to a Sustainable Low Carbon Economy. Ecological Economics, Vol. 70, No. 12, 2011, pp. 2258–2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.014.