Pavement skid resistance is influenced by both pavement macrotexture and microtexture, with the two components providing the skid resistance properties required to assist in ensuring road safety. In addition to these factors the cumulative traffic along a pavement is a known determinant factor influencing pavement surface characteristics leading to deterioration. However, previous research efforts in this area have been evaluated based on laboratory experiments that have not proven to be easily extrapolated to represent field conditions. With this in mind, the present study aims to investigate and comprehend the long-term effect of cumulative traffic on both skid resistance and macrotexture evolution based on actual field measurements. The ultimate research goal is to develop a practical approach for analysis and interpretation of in-situ performance characteristics that could be utilized by road agencies in evaluating long-term skid resistance performance. For the investigation, an 11-year field dataset consisting of three categories of pavement sections defined by their traffic volume/characteristics and geometric design was analyzed. The analysis results showed that skid resistance and macrotexture can be separated into two defined zones during their evolution, which are determinant for the remainder of the pavement service-life. In addition, the varying characteristics of the three investigated cases were presented and a sensitivity analysis performed. Overall, knowledge gained from understanding the long-term field pavement performance can provide valuable information to road agencies for on-time pavement maintenance actions that can help ensure pavement sustainability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HallJ. W.SmithK. L.Titus-GloverL.WamboldJ. C.YagerT. J.RadoZ.NCHRP Web-Only Document 108: Guide for Pavement Friction. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
2.
El HalimA. O. A. Improvement to Highway Safety through Network Level Friction Testing and Cost-Effective Pavement Maintenance. Dissertation, 2010. https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/5172.
LosaM.LeandriP.BacciR.Monitoring and Evaluating Performance Requirements of Flexible Road Pavements. In Transportation and Development Innovative Best Practices, 2008, pp. 511–516.
5.
RajaeiS.ChattiK.DargazanyR. A Review: Pavement Surface Micro-Texture and Its Contribution to Surface Friction. Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017.
6.
SullivanB. W.International Surface Friction Conference: Roads and Runways: Improving Safety through Assessment and Design. Transit New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand, May 1–4 (Session 5), 2005.
7.
MasadE.LuceA.ChowdhuryA.Relationship of Aggregate Texture to Asphalt Pavement Skid Resistance using Image Analysis of Aggregate Shape. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
8.
DoM. T.TangZ.KaneM.LarrardF. D.Evolution of Road-Surface Skid-Resistance and Texture Due to Polishing. Wear, Vol. 266, No. 5–6, 2009, pp. 574–577.
9.
PlatiC.PomoniM.StergiouT.Development of Mean Profile Depth to Mean Texture Depth Shift Factor for Asphalt Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2641: 156–163.
10.
MayoraJ. M. P.PiñaR. J.An Assessment of the Skid Resistance Effect on Traffic Safety under Wet-Pavement Conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 881–886.
11.
KowalskiK.McdanielR.ShahA.OlekJ.Long-Term Monitoring of Noise and Frictional Properties of Three Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2127: 12–19.
12.
KaneM.ZhaoD.De-LarrardF.DoM. T.Laboratory Evaluation of Aggregate Polishing as a Function of Load and Velocity. Application to the Prediction of Damages on Skid Resistance of Road Surfaces Due to Trucks and Passenger Cars. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 13, No, 2, 2012, pp. 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2011.649424.
13.
KaneM.DoM. T.PiauJ. M.On the Study of Polishing of Road Surface under Traffic Load. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 1, 2010, pp. 45–51.
14.
HofkoB.KuglerH.ChankovG.SpielhoferR.A Laboratory Procedure for Predicting Skid and Polishing Resistance of Road Surface. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2017, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1309191.
15.
KhasawnehM.SmadiM.ZelelewH.Investigation of the Factors Influencing Wavelet-Based Macrotexture Values for HMA Pavements. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2016, pp. 779–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2015.1120229.
16.
MulryB.BrennanM. J.SheahanJ. N.A Model for Adjusting Scrim Skid Resistance Data to Reflect Seasonal Variation. Proc., 5th Eurasphalt & Eurobitumen Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 2012.
17.
RaglandD. R.Mi OhS.ChanC. Y.Evaluation of Traffic and Environment Effects on Skid Resistance and Safety Performance of Rubberized Open-Grade Asphalt Concrete. Research Report: UCB-ITS-PRR-2010-14. California PATH Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkley, CA, 2010.
18.
Design Manual for Roads and Bridges. HD 28/15, Volume 7, Section 3, Part 1. Highways England, London, UK, 2015.
19.
ASTM E2157-15. Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Properties using the Circular Track Meter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, www.astm.org.
20.
ASTM E1845-09. Standard Practice for Calculating Pavement Macrotexture Mean Profile Depth. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, www.astm.org.
21.
ASTM E965-15. Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Depth using a Volumetric Technique. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, DOI: 10.1520/E0965-15, www.astm.org.
22.
World Road Association. International PIARC-Experiment to Compare and Harmonize Texture and Skid Resistance Measurements. Paris, France, 1995.
23.
ASTM E1960-07(2015). Standard Practice for Calculating International Friction Index of a Pavement Surface. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, www.astm.org.
24.
UeckermannA.WangD.OeserM.SteinauerB.Calculation of Skid Resistance from Texture Measurements. Journal of traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 2, No. 1, 2015, pp. 3–16.
25.
ErgunM.IyinamS.IyinamA. F.Prediction of Road Surface Friction Coefficient using Only Macro- and Microtexture Measurements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 4, 2005, pp. 311–319.
26.
ChouC. P.LeeC. C.ChenA. C.WucC. Y.Using a Constructive Pavement Texture Index for Skid Resistance Screening. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 10, 2017, pp. 360–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.05.002.
27.
AlhasanA.Bou-SaabG.SmadiO.HernandezN.CochranE.Pavement Friction Modeling using Texture Measurements and Pendulum Skid Tester. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018.
28.
LiuY.FwaT. F.ChooY. S.Effect of Surface Macrotexture on Skid Resistance Measurements by the British Pendulum Test. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2004, pp. 304–309.
29.
LiL.GulerS. I.DonnellE. T.Pavement Friction Degradation Based on Pennsylvania Field Test Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2639: 11–19.
30.
KassemE.AwedA.MasadE.LittleD.Development of Predictive Model for Skid Loss of Asphalt Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2372: 83–96.
31.
MeegodaJ. N.GaoS.Evaluation of Pavement Skid Resistance using High Speed Texture Measurement. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 2, No. 6, 2015, pp. 382–390.
32.
KouchakiS.RoshaniH.HernandezJ. B.ProzziJ.Field Investigation of Relationship between Pavement Surface Texture and Friction. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2018.
33.
AhammedM. A.TigheS. L.Asphalt Pavements Surface Texture and Skid Resistance — Exploring the Reality. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1–9.
34.
Findlay Irvine. Road Base Grip Tester Survey Software for Roads User Manual. Findlay Irvine Ltd, Penicuik, Scotland, 2002.
35.
LammR.PsarianosB.ChoueiriE. M.SoilemezoglouG.A Practical Safety Approach to Highway Geometric Design International Case Studies: Germany, Greece, Lebanon, and the United States. Proc., International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design Practice, Boston, MA, 1995.
36.
WilsonD.DunnR.Normalising Skid Resistance Measurements to Analyse Road Geometric Elements by Timeslices. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2009, pp. 3–14.
