Development of Smartphone Accelerometer-Based Airfield Friction Assessment Tools

Abstract

Airfield managers have identified a need for contingency/emergency friction assessment tools that are both cost-effective and commonly found. Presently, airfield managers and pavement inspection teams prefer to measure friction at high speed with continuous friction measuring equipment (CFME) like the Findley Irvine GripTester. This device and the labor required to operate it are cost prohibitive. This paper explores an alternative, more economical measure of a surface’s frictional characteristics, that is, smartphone accelerometers. Accelerometers were standard friction assessment tools before CFMEs became available. Accelerometer-based friction testers measure the peak deceleration of a vehicle during braking. This acceleration, specifically the vehicle’s deceleration, is proportional to the surface’s friction coefficient. This paper covers research conducted to verify that smartphone accelerometers have sufficient accuracy and precision to operate as deceleration-based friction assessment tools. Findings reported here show that smartphone accelerometers, given sufficient conservatism, can function as deceleration-based friction assessment tools. Along with existing models, new regressions are presented that show correlation between smartphone deceleration measurements and high-speed GripTester measurements. The present work found that improved correlation was limited by common problems associated with poor reproducibility in braking tests.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tabor

The Importance of Hysteresis Losses in the Friction of Lubricated Rubber. Proc. 1st International Skid Prevention Conference, Virginia Council of Highway Investigation and Research, Part 1, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 1958, pp. 211–218.

Grosch

K. A.

The Relation between the Friction and Visco-elastic Properties of Rubber. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Vol. 274, No. 1356, 1963, pp. 21–39.

Kummer

H. W.

Meyer

W. E.

Measurement of Skid Resistance. ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 326 - Symposium on Skid Resistance, New York, NY, 1962, pp. 3–28.

Kummer

H. W.

Meyer

W. E.

NCHRP Report 37: Tentative Skid-resistance Requirements for Main Rural Highways. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1967.

PIARC World Road Association. Report of the Committee on Surface Characteristics. Proc., XVIII World Road Congress, Brussels, Belgium, 1987.

Henry

J. J.

NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 291: Evaluation of Pavement Friction Characteristics . TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

NASA. Runway and Highway Pavement Grooving and Traction Studies. NASA-SP-5073. NASA, Washington, D.C., 1969.

Yager

T. J.

Phillips

W. P.

Horne

W. B.

Sparks

H. C.

A Comparison of Aircraft and Ground Vehicle Stopping Performance on Dry, Wet, Flooded, Slush-, Snow-, and Ice-covered Runways. NASA Technical Note D-6098, Washington, D.C., 1970.

FAA. Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid-Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces. Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5320-12C. FAA, Washington, D.C., 2004.

10.

Leu

M. C.

Henry

J. J.

Prediction of Skid Resistance as a Function of Speed from Pavement Texture Measurements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1978. 666: 7–13.

11.

Woodman

O. J.

An Introduction to Inertial Navigation. UCAM-CL-TR-696. University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, 2007.

12.

Blanco

J. L.

A Tutorial on SE(3) Transformation Parameterizations and On-Manifold Optimization. Technical Report #012010. University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain, 2010.

13.

Bowmonk AFM2 Datasheet. www.bowmonk.com/uploads/files/2016/06/afm2.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2017.

14.

Pullen

Ishee

Cotter

Evaluation of Portable Push-Mode Continuous Friction Measurement Devices for Airfield Use. Air Force Civil Engineer Center, Tyndall Air Force Base, FL, Manuscript in Preparation.