Student Pedestrian Walking Speeds at Crosswalks Near Schools

Abstract

The percentage of young people walking to school has decreased significantly since the 1960s. The reasons for this decline have been attributed to working parents too busy to accompany their children on a daily walk to school, parental concerns about safety from “stranger danger,” and concerns about the risks of walking routes that must cross at least one higher speed or higher volume roadway. School crossings at arterial facilities are often necessitated by the fact that newer schools are sited in peripheral locations and are not located within the heart of residential communities where sidewalks and slower traffic are expected. The objective of this study was to measure and assess the walking speeds of today’s young people who attend either an elementary, middle, or high school and to determine how their walking behavior compares with existing guidelines. The walking speed parameter is a critical component that is used to determine the duration of flashing beacons, high-intensity activated crosswalk (HAWK) beacons, and other pedestrian-activated devices; these devices facilitate school walking routes and provide extra assurance for children and parents alike. This study concluded that the walking speeds of school-aged children, even at the 15th percentile, are generally higher than those of current guidelines, suggesting that agency practitioners have an opportunity to fine tune timing parameters to reduce delay for the motoring public while still ensuring an appropriate and necessary level of safety for school-aged children.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Center for Safe Routes to Schools. How Children Get to School: School Travel Patterns From 1969 to 2009. National Center for Safe Routes to Schools, Chapel Hill, NC, 2011, pp. 2.

Bicycling and Walking in the United States: Benchmarking Report. Alliance for Biking and Walking, Washington, D.C., 2016, pp. 12.

The State of Obesity in Idaho. The State of Obesity: Better Policies for a Healthier America. Trust for America’s Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Washington, D.C., stateofobesity.org/states/id/. Accessed June 25, 2017.

Knutson

L. M.

Schimmel

P. A.

Ruff

Standard Task Measurements for Mobility: Thirty-Second Walk Test. Pediatric Physical Therapy, Vol. 11, 1999, pp. 183–190.

David

K. S.

Sullivan

Expectations for Walking Speeds: Standards for Students in Elementary Schools. Pediatric Physical Therapy, Vol. 17, 2005, pp. 120–127.

Sutherland

Olshen

Biden

Wyatt

The Development of Mature Walking. Cambridge University Press, London, 1988.

Cristina de David

Esteves

Nunes

Dini

Manfio E.

Walking and Running Spatio-Temporal Variables in Children from Three to Six Year Old. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. health.uottawa.ca/biomech/csb/Archives/csb2006.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2017.

Stansfield

B. W.

Hillman

S. J.

Hazlewood

M. E.

Robb

J. E.

Regression Analysis of Gait Parameters with Speed in Normal Children Walking at Self-Selected Speeds. Gait and Posture, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2006, pp. 288–294.

Dusing

S. C.

Thorpe

D. E.

A Normative Sample of Temporal and Spatial Gait Parameters in Children Using the GAITRite® Electronic Walkway. Gait and Posture, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2007, pp. 135–139.

10.

Lythgo

Wilson

Galea

Basic Gait and Symmetry Measures for Primary School-Aged Children and Young Adults Whilst Walking Barefoot and with Shoes. Gait and Posture, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2009, pp. 502–506.

11.

Knoblauch

Pietrucha

Nitzburg

Field Studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1996. 1538: 27–38.

12.

Gates

T. J.

Noyce

D. A.

Bill

A. R.

Van Ee

Recommended Walking Speeds for Pedestrian Clearance Timing Based on Pedestrian Characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1982: 38–47.

13.

Mitman

Ragland.

Crosswalk Confusion: More Evidence Why Pedestrian and Driver Knowledge of the Vehicle Code Should Not Be Assumed. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2002: 55–63.

14.

Knoblauch

Nitzburg

Seifert

Pedestrian Crosswalk Case Studies: Richmond, Virginia; Buffalo, New York; Stillwater, Minnesota. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-103. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2001.

15.

Knoblauch

Raymond

The Effect of Crosswalk Markings on Vehicle Speeds in Maryland, Virginia, and Arizona. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-101. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2000.

16.

Harvard

A. Willis

Effects of Installing a Marked Crosswalk on Road Crossing Behaviour and Perceptions of the Environment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 15, 2012, pp. 249–260.

17.

Montufar

Arango

Porter

Nakagawa

Pedestrians’ Normal Walking Speed and Speed When Crossing a Street. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2002: 90–97.

18.

Yang

Park

H. J.

Park

Crossing Behavior and Optimal Signal Control Policy at Primary School Crosswalks. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.

19.

LaPlante

Kaeser

The Continuing Evolution of Pedestrian Walking Speed Assumptions. Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE Journal, Vol. 74, No. 9, 2004, pp. 32–40.

20.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Public Roads Administration, Washington, D.C., 1948.

21.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, D.C., 1961.

22.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. United States Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1978.

23.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. United States Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2000.

24.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. United States Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2003.

25.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. United States Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2009.

26.

Google Maps. Boise, Idaho, 2017. https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5884125,-116.3228265,12z.

27.

Google Maps. Moscow, Idaho, 2017. https://www.google.com/maps/@46.7350388,-116.9913989,15z.

28.

Pucher

Promoting Safe Walking and Cycling to Improve Public Health: Lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 93, No. 9, 2003, pp. 7.