Towards a Reliability-Based Pavement Design using Response Surface Methods

Abstract

Reliability has been incorporated in many pavement design procedures to account for the effects of inputs variabilities and uncertainties on predicted performance. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) mechanistic empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) computes the reliability of pavement sections with the assumption that the variability of predicted distresses follows normal distribution. This approach does not account for the systematic contribution of each design input variability on the overall output variance. This paper evaluates a two-component reliability analysis methodology for pavement application. The two-component reliability analysis methodology uses a response surface method (RSM) for a surrogate model generation and the first order reliability method (FORM) for reliability computation. Three different response surface methods (central composite, Box–Behnken and Doehlert designs) were implemented and statistically verified for their suitability for surrogate model generation. The two-component reliability analysis methodology was further utilized for the generation of partial safety factors for the development of a load and resistance factor design (LRFD) procedure for pavement applications. Field pavement sections with a wide range in design inputs and target reliabilities were used to evaluate the proposed reliability analysis methodology. The results have shown that the three RSM can be used effectively for pavement reliability problems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Huang

Pavement Analysis and Design, 2nd ed.Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2004, p. 505

Timm

D. H.

Birgisson

Newcomb

D. E.

Variability of Mechanistic–Empirical Flexible Pavement Design Parameters. Proc., 5th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, Norway, Vol. 1, 1998.

Darter

M. I.

McCullough

B. F.

Brown

J. L.

Reliability Concepts Applied to the Texas Flexible Pavement System. Highway Research Record, 1972. 407: 146–161.

Noureldin

S. A.

Sharaf

Arafah

Al-Sugair

Estimation of Standard Deviation of Predicted Performance of Flexible Pavements Using AASHTO Model. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1994. 1449: 46–56.

AASHTO. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1993.

ARA Inc. Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Technical Report. ARA Inc., Champaign, 2004.

Dinegdae

Birgisson

Design Inputs Variabilities Influence on Pavement Performance Reliability. Proc., 4th Chinese European Workshop Functional Pavement Design, 2016, pp. 741–750.

Timm

D. H.

Newcomb

D. E.

Birgisson

Galambos

T. V.

Incorporation of Reliability into the Minnesota Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Method. Final Report Prepared to Minnesota Department of Transportation. Minnesota Univ., Department of Civil Engineering, Minneapolis, 1999.

Maji

Das

Reliability Considerations of Bituminous Pavement Design by Mechanistic-Empirical Approach. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, pp. 19–31.

10.

Kim

H. B.

Buch

Reliability-Based Pavement Design Model Accounting for Inherent Variability of Design Parameters. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.

11.

Retherford

J. Q.

McDonald

Reliability Methods Applicable to Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2154: 130–137.

12.

Dinegdae

Birgisson

Reliability-Based Calibration for a Mechanics-Based Fatigue Cracking Design Procedure. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2016, pp. 529–546.

13.

Kim

H. B.

Harichandran

R. S.

Buch

Development of Load and Resistance Factor Design Format for Flexible Pavements. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, 1998, pp. 880–885.

14.

Dinegdae

Y. H.

Reliability-Based Design Procedure for Flexible Pavements. Licentiate thesis. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2015.

15.

Montgomery

D. C.

Design and Analysis of Experiments: Response Surface Method and Designs. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2005.

16.

Lamer

A. C.

Moavenzadeh

Reliability of Highway Pavements. Highway Research Record, 1971. 362: 1–8.

17.

Darter

M. I.

Hudson

W. R.

Brown

J. L.

Statistical Variation of Flexible Pavement Properties and Their Consideration in Design. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 42, 1973, pp. 589–615.

18.

Hasofer

A. M.

Lind

N. C.

An Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 100, No. 1, 1974, pp. 111–121.

19.

Rackwitz

Fiessler

Structural Reliability under Combined Random Load Sequences. Computers and Structures, Vol. 9, No. 5, 1978, pp. 484–494.

20.

Dinegdae

Birgisson

Reliability-Based Design Procedure for Fatigue Cracking in Asphalt Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2583: 127–133.

21.

Y. T

. Efficient Methods for Mechanical and Structural Reliability Analysis and Design. PhD thesis. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 1984.

22.

Box

G. E. P.

Wilson

K. B.

Series B (Methodological). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1951, pp. 1–45.

23.

Box

G. E. P.

Behnken

D. W.

Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables. Technometrics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1960, pp. 455–475.

24.

Doehlert

D. H.

Uniform Shell Designs. Applied Statistics, Vol. 19, 1970, pp. 231–239.

25.

Dinegdae

Y. H.

Onifade

Jelagin

Birgisson

Mechanics Based Top Down Fatigue Cracking Initiation Prediction Design Framework for Asphalt Pavements. Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2015, pp. 907–927.

26.

Onifade

Dinegdae

Birgisson

Hierarchical Approach for Fatigue Cracking Performance Evaluation in Asphalt Pavements. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2017, pp. 1–13.

27.

Dinegdae

Y. H

Birgisson

Effects of Truck Traffic on Top-Down Fatigue Cracking Performance of Flexible Pavements Using a New Mechanics-Based Analysis Framework. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2018, pp. 182–200.

28.

Kumar

D. P.

Birgisson

Jelagin

Kringos

Investigation of the Asphalt Mixture Morphology Influence on Its Ageing Susceptibility. Materials and Structures, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2015, pp. 987–1000.

29.

Lira

Jelagin

Birgisson

Gradation-Based Framework for Asphalt Mixture. Materials and Structure, Vol. 46, No. 8, 2013, pp. 1401–1414.

30.

NCHRP Project 1-37A: Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.

31.

Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Roadway Designs/Pavement Managements/Reports, 2013. www.dot.state.fl.us. Accessed April 15, 2015.

32.

AASHTO. Proposed American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. NCHRP Project 20-7/24, Vol. 2, Washington, D.C., 1985.

33.

AASHTO. LRFD Highway Bridge Design Specifications, SI Units. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., First Edition (1994 with 1996 and 1997 Interims).