Effects of the International Roughness Index and Rut Depth on Crash Rates

Abstract

Pavement distresses directly affect ride quality, and indirectly contribute to driver distraction, vehicle operation, and accidents. In this study, analysis was performed on highways in the states of Arizona, North Carolina, and Maryland to investigate the relationship between accident rate and pavement ride quality (roughness) and rut depth. Two main types of data were collected: crash data from the accident records and International Roughness Index (IRI) and rut depth data from the pavement management system database in each state. Crash rates were calculated using the U.S. Department of Transportation method, which is the number of accidents per 100 million vehicle-miles of travel. Sigmoidal function regression analysis was performed to study the relationship between crash rate and both IRI and rut depth. In all cases, the crash rate did not show substantial increases until an IRI value of 210 inches/mile or a critical rut depth of 0.4 inches. When the IRI or rut depth increased above these values the crash rate increased. This is a key conclusion that provides empirically derived thresholds for IRI and rut depth to reducing the accident rate.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Garber

N.J.

Hoel

L.A.

. Traffic and Highway Engineering, 5th ed. Cengage Learning, Stamford, CT, 2015.

Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Circular No. E-C134: Influence of Roadway Surface Discontinuities on Safety: State of the Art. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2009.

Chan

C. Y.

Huang

Yan

Richards

. Investigating Effects of Asphalt Pavement Conditions on Traffic Accidents in Tennessee Based on the Pavement Management System (PMS). Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2010, pp. 150–161.

Wambold

J. C.

Brickman

A. D.

Park

W. H.

Ingram

. Effect of Road Roughness on Vehicle Braking. In Highway Research Record 471, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1973, pp. 76–82.

Burns

J. C.

Roughness and Roadway Safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1981. 836: 8–14.

Hall

J. W.

Smith

K. L.

Titus-Glover

Wambold

J. C.

Yager

T. J.

Rado

. NCHRP Project 1-43: Guide for Pavement Friction. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.

Noyce

D. A.

Bahia

H.U.

Yambo

J.M.

Kim

. Incorporating Road Safety into Pavement Management: Maximizing Asphalt Pavement Surface Friction for Road Safety Improvements. Draft Literature Review and State Surveys, Midwest Regional University Transportation Center (UMTRI), Madison, Wis., 2005.

Gillespie

T. D.

Sayers

(eds.). Development, Implementation, and Application of the Reference Quarter-Car Simulation. In Measuring Road Roughness and Its Effects on User Cost and Comfort. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1985.

King

The Effect of Road Roughness on Traffic Speed and Road Safety. PhD dissertation. University of Southern Queensland, Australia, 2014.

10.

Cairney

Bennet

. Relationship between Surface Characteristics on Selected Rural Roads in Victoria Rural Roads. Proc., 23rd ARRB Conference. ARRB Group, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia, 2008. http://worldcat.org/isbn/1876592540.

11.

Graves

S. J.

Daniel

Michael

A. D.

. Mining and Analysis of Traffic Safety and Roadway Condition Data. UTCA Report 04310. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, July 2005. http://utca.eng.ua.edu/files/2011/08/04310fnl.pdf.

12.

Chunxiao

Liang

. Impact of Pavement Conditions on Crash Severity. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 399–406.

13.

Safety Impact of Pavement Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2455: 77–88.

14.

Tehrani

Cowe Falls

. A Comparison of IRI and Collision Rates in the Province of Alberta. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Vol. 1024, 2012, p. 1.

15.

Cenek

P. D.

Henderson

R. J.

Forbes

Davies

R. B.

Tait

. The Relationship between Crash Rates and Rutting. Research Report No. 545. New Zealand Transport Agency, 2014.

16.

Qiao-Jun

. Safety Evaluation Method of Freeway Pavement Condition. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2013, pp. 130–135.

17.

Gao

Wang

Sun

. Research on Comfort and Safety Threshold of Pavement Roughness. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2641: 149–155.

18.

Arizona Department of Transportation. Vehicles of ADOT: Profilometer. Phoenix, AZ. https://www.azdot.gov/media/blog/posts/2015/01/23/vehicles-of-adot-profilometer. Accessed May 31, 2018.

19.

North Carolina Department of Transportation. High Speed Inertial Profilometer. Raleigh, NC. https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/construction/Structural%20Design%20AGCDOT%20Joint%20Bridge%20Design%20Commi/Pavement%20Design%20and%20Data%20Collection%20Section.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2018.

20.

Maryland State Highway Administration Automatic Road Analyzer (ARAN). Baltimore, MD. http://www.roadware.com/news-and-events/News-Release-Maryland_ARAN9000_FINAL_Apr-11-16.pdf. Accessed on May 31, 2018.

21.

Mamlouk

Zapata

. Necessary Assessment of Use of State Pavement Management System Data in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Calibration Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2153: 58–66.

22.

Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Roadway Safety Information Analysis: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners. Washington, D.C. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasaxx1210/s3.cfm. Accessed on May 31, 2018.