During the five-year period between 2010 and 2014, there were 24,178 pedestrian crashes in Illinois. Approximately 4.39% of these pedestrian crashes occurred in rural areas; and approximately 40% of the crashes resulted in a severe injury or a fatality. Thus, pedestrian safety problems exist in rural locales, and the factors contributing to these problems need to be investigated. The goal of this study is to answer the question: “Which variable categories, when acting together, contribute more to the occurrence of pedestrian crashes in rural areas?” Crashes are random events stemming from the convergence of various factors. However, traditional statistical tools can only make pairwise comparisons of dependent and independent variables. Therefore, it is necessary to apply an analytical tool that can identify complex underlying structures in crash data and spot associations among variable categories that contribute to crash occurrence. The multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) method, which is used in this study, can do just that. According to the obtained results, categories of variables such as roadway functional class, the number of lanes, lighting conditions, weather conditions, traffic control devices, driver condition, and pedestrian condition were proved to contribute to pedestrian crashes in rural Illinois.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts-2015 Data. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2017.
2.
ChakravarthyB.LotfipourS.VacaF. E.Pedestrian Injuries: Emergency Care Considerations. The California Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2007, pp.15–21.
3.
Federal Highway Administration. Factors Contributing to Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes on Rural Highways. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2007.
4.
Pour-RouholaminM.ZhouH.Investigating the Risk Factors Associated with Pedestrian Injury Severity in Illinois. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 57, 2016, pp. 9–17.
5.
TuluG. S.WashingtonS.HaqueM. M.KingM. J.Investigation of Pedestrian Crashes on Two-way Two-lane Rural Roads in Ethiopia. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 78, 2015, pp. 119–126.
6.
IslamS.JonesS. L.Pedestrian At-fault Crashes on Rural and Urban Roadways in Alabama. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 72, 2014, pp. 268–276.
7.
VellosoM. S.JacquesM. A.On-the-spot Study of Pedestrian Crashes on Brazilian Federal District Rural Highways Crossing Urban Areas. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2012, pp. 588–599.
8.
CarterD. L.CouncilF. M.Factors Contributing to Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes on Rural Highways. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
9.
ZajacS. S.IvanJ. N.Factors Influencing Injury Severity of Motor Vehicle–crossing Pedestrian Crashes in Rural Connecticut. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2002, pp. 369–379.
10.
MonellaA.Identifying Crash Contributory Factors at Urban Roundabouts and Using Association Rules to Explore Their Relationships to Different Crash Types. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2011, pp. 1451–1463.
11.
DasS.SunX.Factor Association using Multiple Correspondence Analysis in Vehicle-pedestrian Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2519: 95–103.
12.
DasS.SunX.Exploring Clusters of Contributing Factors for Single Vehicle Fatal Crashes through Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
Illinois Department of Transportation. Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois, 2009.
15.
NalletN.BernardM.ChironM.Individuals Taking a French Driving License Points Recovery Course: Their Attitudes Towards Violations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 1836–1843.
16.
LuS.MeiP.WangJ.ZhangH.Fatality and Influence Factors in High-casualty Fires: A Correspondence Analysis. Safety Science, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1019–1033.
17.
GreenacreM.BlasiusJ.Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
18.
Le RouxB.RouanetH.Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Sage Publication, Inc., Paris, 2010.
19.
CostaP. S.SantosN. C.CunhaP.CotterJ.SousaN.The Use of Multiple Correspondence Analysis to Explore Associations between Categories of Qualitative Variables in Healthy Ageing. Journal of Aging Research, Vol. 2013, 2013, pp. 1–12.
20.
BaireddyR.Pour-RouholaminM.ZhouH.QiY.Factors Contributing to Injury Severity of Pedestrian Crashes at Uncontrolled Locations in Illinois. Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017.
21.
SiddiquiN.ChuX.GuttenplanM.Crossing Locations, Light Conditions, and Pedestrian Injury Severity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1982: 141–149.
22.
ChuX.Pedestrian Safety at Midblock Locations. FDOT-BD544-16. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2006.
23.
RothmanL.William HowardA.CambenA.MacarthurC.Pedestrian Crossing Location Influences Injury Severity in Urban Areas. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2012, pp. 365–370.
24.
LeS.JosseJ.HussonF.FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1–18.
25.
DasS.SunX.Association Knowledge for Fatal Run-off-road Crashes by Multiple Correspondence Analysis. IATSS Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2016, pp. 146–155.
26.
GarderP. E.The Impact of Speed and Other Variables on Pedestrian Safety in Maine. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2004, pp. 533–542.
27.
ZahabiS. A.StraussJ.Miranda-MorenoL. F.ManaughK.Estimating Potential Effect of Speed Limits, Built Environment, and Other Factors on Pedestrian and Cyclist Injury Severity Levels in Traffic Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2247: 81–90.
28.
ZeegerC.StewartJ.HuangH.LagerweyP.Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes in 30 Cities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001. 1773: 56–68.
29.
GalanisA.BotzorisG.EliouN.Pedestrian Road Safety in Relation to Urban Road Type and Traffic Flow. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 24, 2017, pp. 220–227.
30.
KimJ.-K.UlfarssonG. F.ShankarV. N.KimS.Age and Pedestrian Injury Severity in Motor-vehicle Crashes: A Heteroskedastic Logit Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1695–1702.
31.
LeeC.Adbel-AtyM.Comprehensive Analysis of Vehicle–pedestrian Crashes at Intersections in Florida. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No.4, 2005, pp. 775–786.
32.
KrammesR.SheldahlE.Traffic Calming on Main Roads Through Rural Communities. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2009.
33.
FurstT.Memorandum: Promoting the Implementation of Proven Safety Countermeasures. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2012.
34.
CarlsonP. J.MilesJ. D.PikeA. M.ParkS. E.Evaluation of Wet-Weather and Contrast Pavement Marking Applications. Final Report. FHWA/TX-05/0-5008-2. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas, 2007.
35.
NabrosD.GoughnourS. E.Non-Motorized User Safety: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2012.
36.
FitzpatrickK.BrewerM.AvelarR.Driver Yielding at Traffic Control Signals, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons, and Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons in Texas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2463: 46–54.
37.
FellJ. C.LaceyV. R.Sobriety Checkpoints: Evidence of Effectiveness is Strong, but Use is Limited. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010, pp. 220–227.
