The FHWA’s Demonstration Project for Enhanced Durability of Asphalt Pavements through Increased In-Place Pavement Density

Abstract

Recognizing the importance of in-place density in building cost-effective asphalt pavements, a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Demonstration Project was created for “Enhanced Durability of Asphalt Pavements through Increased In-Place Pavement Density.” The objective of the demonstration project was to determine the benefit of additional compaction and show that additional density could be obtained through improved techniques. This project effort included two major components: (1) a literature search to serve as an educational component regarding the best practices for increasing density, and (2) the construction of 10 field demonstration projects. Eight of the 10 states improved densities by at least 1% compared to a control section on their field demonstration projects. There were at least two pavement sections (a control and at least one test section) constructed within each of the 10 states that participated in this field demonstration project. Many of the states constructed more than two pavement sections for a total of 38 sections. There were many variables, including mixture type, construction equipment, and procedures between states and within states. A summary of the methods that states used to obtain increased density generally fell into one of five categories: (1) improving the agency’s specification by including or increasing incentives and increasing the minimum percentage density requirements; (2) making engineering adjustments to the asphalt mixture design to obtain slightly higher optimum asphalt content (although not part of the original goal of the demonstration project); (3) improving consistency as measured by the standard deviation; (4) following best practices; and (5) using new technologies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asphalt Institute. The Asphalt Handbook. 7th ed. Asphalt Institute, College Park, MD, 2007, pp. 788.

Tran

Turner

Shambley

Enhanced Compaction to Improve Durability and Extend Pavement Service Life: A Literature Review. NCAT report no. 16-02. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, 2016, pp. 25.

Epps

Monismith

Deacon

Harvey

Leahy

NCHRP Report 455: Recommended Performance-Related Specification for Hot-Mix Asphalt Construction: Results of the Westrack Project. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002.

Timm

West

Priest

Powell

Selvaraj

Zhang

Brown

Phase II NCAT Test Track Results. NCAT report no. 06-05. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, 2006, pp. 83.

Brown

E. R.

Hainin

Cooley

Hurley

NCHRP Report 531: Relationship of Air Voids, Lift Thickness, and Permeability in Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Hekmatfar

McDaniel

Shah

Haddock

Optimizing Laboratory Mixture Design as It Relates to Field Compaction in Order to Improve Hot-Mix Asphalt Durability. Joint Transportation Research Program Technical Report SPR-3624. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2013, pp. 51.

Federal Highway Administration. Superpave Mix Design and Gyratory Compaction Levels. Tech Brief FHWA-HIF-11-03. Office of Pavement Technology, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 10.

Beainy

Singh

Cummuri

Zaman

Laboratory and Field Study of Compaction Quality of an Asphalt Pavement. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 7, No. 5, 2014, pp. 317–323.

Scherocman

Compaction of Stiff and Tender Asphalt Concrete Mixes. Factors Affecting Compaction of Asphalt Pavements. Transportation Research Circular E-C105. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 69–83.

10.

National Asphalt Pavement Association. Balancing Production Rates in Hot Mix Asphalt Operations. Information Series 120. National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD, 1996, pp. 32.

11.

Timm

. MultiCool Software. http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/timmdav/MultiCool/FinalRelease/Main.html#Disclaim. Accessed February 20, 2017.

12.

Federal Highway Administration. A Review of Aggregate and Asphalt Mixture Specific Gravity Measurements and Their Impacts on Asphalt Mix Design Properties and Mix Acceptance. Tech Brief FHWA-HIF-11-033. Office of Pavement Technology, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 39.

13.

Santucci

. The Role of Compaction in the Fatigue Resistance of Asphalt Pavements. Institute of Transportation Studies, Technology Transfer Program, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 1998.

14.

Nodes

Impact of Incentives on In-Place Air Voids. Factors Affecting Compaction of Asphalt Pavements. Transportation Research Circular E-C105. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 163–168.

15.

Aschenbrener

Brown

E. R.

Tran

Blankenship

Demonstration Project for Enhanced Durability of Asphalt Pavements through Increased In-Place Pavement Density. NCAT report no. 17-05. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, 2017, pp. 86.

16.

Prowell

Hurley

Frank

Warm Mix Asphalt: Best Practices. 3rd ed. National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD, 2012.

17.

Chang

Rutledge

Horan

Michael

White

Vennapusa

Accelerated Implementation of Intelligent Compaction for Embankment Subgrade Soils, Aggregate Base, and Asphalt Pavement Materials. Final report. FHWAIF-12–002. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011.

18.

Chang

Rutledge

Gerber

A Study on Intelligent Compaction and In-Place Density. FHWA-HIF-14-017. National Technical Information Service, Washington, D.C., 2014.

19.

Willoughby

Mahoney

Pierce

Uhlmeyer

Anderson

Read

Muench

Thompson

Moore

Construction-Related Asphalt Concrete Pavement Temperature Differentials and the Corresponding Density Differentials. Report Number WA-RD 476.1. Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, Washington, D.C., 2001.

20.

Benson

Scherocman

Construction of Durable Longitudinal Joints. Transportation Research Circular E-C105: Factors Affecting Compaction of Asphalt Pavements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006.

21.

Asphalt Institute. State Highway Agency (SHA) Density Specification Data Mining. FHWA Co-op. Task 2.15 State Density Maps. Asphalt Institute, College Park, MD, 2016. http://www.asphaltpavement.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1049&Itemid=100334. Accessed February 20, 2017.

22.

Federal Highway Administration. Tack Coat Best Practices. Tech Brief FHWA-HIF-16-017. Office of Pavement Technology, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2016, pp. 17.