In this study, soft computing and multilinear regression techniques were employed to develop models for prediction of progression of chip seal percent embedment depth (Pe). The model uses inputs such as cumulative equivalent traffic volume, Vialit test results, dust content of aggregates, and initial embedment depth. Multilinear regression, adaptive neuro-fuzzy system, and artificial neural network techniques were used to estimate the Pe. The contribution of the variables affecting Pe was evaluated through a sensitivity analysis. The results indicate that while most of the proposed models were able to predict the Pe reasonably, the artificial neural network model performed the best.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LabiS.SinhaK. C.. Effectiveness of Highway Pavement Seal Coating Treatments. Asphalt, Vol. 130, 2004, pp. 14–23.
2.
LeeJ.KimY.. Understanding the Effects of Aggregate and Emulsion Application Rates on Performance of Asphalt Surface Treatments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2044: 71–78.
3.
GransbergD. D.Chip Seal Program Excellence in the United States. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1933: 72–82.
4.
BensonF. J.GallawayB. M.. Retention of Cover Stone by Asphalt Surface Treatments. Bulletin Texas Engineering Experiment Station System College Station, Vol. 133SRC, 1953.
5.
ShulerS.Chip Seals for High Traffic Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1990. 1259: 24–34.
6.
RoqueR.AndersonD.. Effect of Material, Design, and Construction Variables on Seal-Coat Performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1991. 1300: 108–115.
7.
GürerC.KaraşahinM.ÇetinS.AktaşB.. Effects of Construction-Related Factors on Chip Seal Performance. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 35, 2012, pp. 605–613, 2012.
8.
Transport New Zealand. Notes for the Specification for Bituminous Reseals (TNZ P17). Wellington, New Zealand: Transport New Zealand, 2002.
9.
AktaşB.KaraşahinM.TiǧdemirM.. Developing a Macrotexture Prediction Model for Chip Seals. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 41, 2013, pp. 784–789.
10.
AdamsJ. M.KimY. R.. Mean Profile Depth Analysis of Field and Laboratory Traffic-Loaded Chip Seal Surface Treatments. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2013, pp. 645–656.
11.
PraticòF. G.VaianaR.IueleT.. Surface Performance Characterization of Single-Layer Surface Dressing: A Macrotexture Prediction Model, 8th RILEM International Symposium on Testing and Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Bituminous Materials, RILEM Bookseries, Vol. 11, 2016, pp. 459–470.
12.
FlintschG.de LeónE.McGheeK.AI-QadiI.. Pavement Surface Macrotexture Measurement and Applications. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1860: 168–177.
13.
ChinaS.JamesD. E.. Comparison of Laser-Based and Sand Patch Measurements of Pavement Surface Macrotexture. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 2, 2012, pp. 176–181.
14.
KutayM. E.OzdemirU.HibnerD.KumbargeriY.LanotteM.. Development of an Acceptance Test for Chip Seal Projects. No. SPR-1649. Michigan State University, 2016.
15.
ChapraS. C.RaymondC. P.. Numerical Methods for Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.
16.
BroR.SmildeA.. Principal Component Analysis. Analytical Methods, Vol. 6, No. 9, 2014, p. 2812.
17.
JangJ. S. R.SunC. T.MizutaniE.. Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing-A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1997, pp. 1219.
18.
DaldabanF.UstkoyuncuN.GuneyK.. Phase Inductance Estimation for Switched Reluctance Motor Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Vol. 47, No 5, 2006, p. 347.
19.
MamdaniE.AssilianS.. An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller. Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, 1993, pp. 283–289.
20.
JangJ.ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 23, No.3, 1993, pp.665–685.
21.
TakagiT.SugenoM.. Fuzzy Identification of Systems and Its Applications to Modeling and Control. Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, 1993, pp. 387–403.
22.
CybenkoG.Approximation by Superpositions of a Sigmoidal Function. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1989, pp. 303–314.
23.
HornikK.StinchcombeM.WhiteH.. Multilayer Feedforward Networks Are Universal Approximators. Neural Networks, Vol. 2, No. 5, 1989, pp. 359–366.
24.
DemuthH.BealeM.. Neural network toolbox: for use with Matlab: Computation Visualization Programming Neural Network Toolbox: User’s Guide, Version 4. The Mathworks.
25.
OzturkH. I.KutayM. E.. An Artificial Neural Network Model for Virtual Superpave Asphalt Mixture Design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2014, pp. 151–162.
26.
HaykinS.NEURAL NETWORKS A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall, Hamilton, 1994.
27.
CigizogluH.KişiÖ.. Flow Prediction by Three Back Propagation Techniques Using K-Fold Partitioning of Neural Network Training Data. Hydrology Research, Vol. 36, No. 12005, pp. 49–64.
28.
MarquardtD. W.An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1963,pp. 431–441.
29.
HaganM.MenhajM.. Training Feedforward Networks with the Marquardt Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 5, No. 6, 1994, pp. 989–993.
30.
TUBITAK-107G081. Improving Seal Coat Applications and Development of a Performance Model in Highways. Ankara, 2011.
