Although roadway grades are known to affect vehicle fuel consumption and emissions rates, there do not appear to be any systematic evaluations of these impacts in the literature. Consequently, this paper addresses this void by offering a systematic analysis of the impact of roadway grades on vehicle fuel consumption and emissions rates by using the INTEGRATION microscopic traffic simulation software. The energy and emissions impacts are quantified for various cruising speeds, under stop-and-go conditions, and for various traffic signal control scenarios. The study demonstrates that the impact of roadway grade is significant, with increases in vehicle fuel consumption and emissions rates in excess of 9% for a 1% increase in roadway grade. Consequently, a reduction in roadway grades in the range of 1% can offer savings that are equivalent to those offered by various advanced traffic management systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PiersonW. R.GertlerA. W.RobinsonN. F.ZielinskaB.BishopG. A.StedmanD. H.ZweidingerR. B. and RayW. D.. Summary of Recent Tunnel Studies in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora Mountain Tunnels. Presented at Fourth CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, Calif., 1994.
2.
Van AerdeM. and YagarS.. Dynamic Integrated Freeway/Traffic Signal Networks: Problems and Proposed Solutions. Transportation Research, Vol. 22A, 1988, pp. 435–443.
3.
Van AerdeM. and YagarS.. Dynamic Integrated Freeway/Traffic Signal Networks: A Routing-Based Modeling Approach. Transportation Research, Vol. 22A, 1988, pp. 445–453.
4.
Van AerdeM. and HellingaB.. INTEGRATION: An Overview of Current Simulation Features. Presented at 75th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996.
5.
M. Van Aerde and Associates. INTEGRATION Release 2.30 for Windows: User's Guide, Vol. I. Fundamental Features. M. Van Aerde and Associates, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2002.
6.
M. Van Aerde and Associates. INTEGRATION Release 2.30 for Windows: User's Guide. Vol. II. Advanced Features. M. Van Aerde and Associates, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2002.
7.
RakhaH. A. and Van AerdeM. W.. Comparison of Simulation Modules of TRANSYT and Integration Models. In Transportation Research Record 1566, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 1–7.
8.
RakhaH. and CrowtherB.. Comparison of Greenshields, Pipes, and Van Aerde Car-Following and Traffic Stream Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1802, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 248–262.
9.
RakhaH.Van AerdeM.BloombergL. and HuangX.. Construction and Calibration of a Large-Scale Microsimulation Model of the Salt Lake Area. In Transportation Research Record 1644, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 93–102.
10.
RakhaH.MedinaA.SinH.DionF.Van AerdeM. and JenqJ.. Traffic Signal Coordination Across Jurisdictional Boundaries: Field Evaluation of Efficiency, Energy, Environmental, and Safety Impacts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1727, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 42–51.
11.
RakhaH.LucicI.DemarchiS. H.SettiJ. R. and Van AerdeM.. Vehicle Dynamics Model for Predicting Maximum Truck Acceleration Levels. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, 2001, pp. 418–425.
12.
RakhaH. and LucicI.. Variable Power Vehicle Dynamics Model for Estimating Maximum Truck Acceleration Levels. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 128, 2002, pp. 412–419.
13.
RakhaH.SnareM. and DionF.. Vehicle Dynamics Model for Estimating Maximum Light-Duty Vehicle Acceleration Levels. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1883, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 40–49.
14.
RakhaH.PasumarthyP. and AdjeridS.. Modeling Longitudinal Vehicle Motion: Issues and Proposed Solutions. Presented at Transport Science and Technology Congress, Athens, Greece, 2004.
15.
RakhaH. and AhnK.. Integration Modeling Framework for Estimating Mobile Source Emissions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 130, 2004, pp. 183–193.
16.
RakhaH.AhnK. and TraniA.. Development of VT-Micro Model for Estimating Hot Stabilized Light Duty Vehicle and Truck Emissions. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, Vol. 9, 2004, pp. 49–74.
17.
AhnK.RakhaH.TraniA. and Van AerdeM.. Estimating Vehicle Fuel Consumption and Emissions Based on Instantaneous Speed and Acceleration Levels. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 128, 2002, pp. 182–190.
18.
AhnK.RakhaH. and TraniA.. Microframework for Modeling of High-Emitting Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1880, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 39–49.
19.
RakhaH.AhnK. and TraniA.. Comparison of MOBILE5a, MOBILE6, VT-MICRO, and CMEM Models for Estimating Hot-Stabilized Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicle Emissions. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, 2003, pp. 1010–1021.
20.
RakhaH. and DingY.. Impact of Stops on Vehicle Fuel Consumption and Emissions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, 2003, pp. 23–32.
