Sketch Models to Forecast Commuter and Light Rail Ridership

Abstract

Ridership potential is among the most valuable attributes to understand about a proposed light or commuter rail line during early stages of project development, yet few nationally relevant sketch-level tools exist for feasibility analyses. Research was done to develop a nationally applicable, sketch-level ridership forecasting tool for light rail and commuter rail. The study collected current ridership, demographic, and transportation system data from 17 U.S. regions, including 58 commuter rail corridors, 22 light rail corridors, and 1,218 stations, and it tested 163 possible explanatory variables. The effort yielded two multivariable regression equations that show close relationships between actual and predicted values, with adjusted R-squared values of 0.97 for commuter rail and 0.92 for light rail. The models also validate well to existing rail systems in six regions and successfully predict actual line ridership with adjusted R-squared values of 0.84 for commuter rail and 0.47 for light rail. The new models improve on previous tools by introducing sensitivity to reverse-commute trips and special transportation hubs or ports and by introducing transportation-system variables to measure the impacts of faster operating speeds, lower fares, or shorter midday headways. The models require readily available data and use simple form, making the tool technically accessible to a large number of transportation planners. An apples-to-apples comparison with similar sketch models developed nearly a decade ago in TCRP Report 16 shows that the new tools perform consistently better, explaining between 31% and 213% more variation in observed rail boardings among the same validation data sets.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., R. Cervero, Howard/Stein Hudson Associates, Inc., and J. Zupan. TCRP Report 16: Commuter and Light Rail Transit Corridors: The Land Use Connection. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Davidson

Urban Rail Sketch Planning Ridership Forecasting Model. Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, Ariz., Sept. 1999.

Banks

R. L.

& Associates, Inc. Kansas City Region Commuter Rail Study: Initial Corridor Screening. Mid-America Regional Council, March 20, 2001.

Politics: Light Headed? Alternatives for Getting from Here to There. Austin Chronicle, Vol. 18, No. 47. www.austinchronicle.com/issues/vol18/issue47/pols.capmetro.side1.html. Accessed Nov. 10, 2005.

Blash

Duncan

Hranac

and Khazai

. AC Transit Telegraph MIS Project: Integrating GIS and Travel Model Evaluation Methodologies. www-laep.ced.berkeley.edu/classes/cp255.people/cp255-bx/Project/final.html. Accessed Nov. 10, 2005.

LS Transit Systems, Inc. Around the Bay Rail Study. www.kko.com/sprc/research/baystudy/. Accessed Nov. 10, 2005.

Rice

W. E.

A Model of Selected Ridership Forecasting Techniques with a Limited Database—A Case Study: The Central Coast Diegan. Proc., International Conference on Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century. Computational Mechanics, 1998, pp. 3–12.

Savage

J. P.

Jr . Simplified Approaches to Ferry Travel Demand Forecasting. In Transportation Research Record 1608, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 17–29.

Northern Virginia 2020 Transportation Plan: Technical Report. Transportation Coordinating Council. www.virginiadot.org/projects/nova/nv2020/techdocs/docsects/tblocont.htm. Accessed Nov. 10, 2005.

10.

Warner

Travel Demand Forecasting. Warner Transportation Consulting. www.warnertransportation.com/TDF.htm. Accessed June 14, 2005.

11.

Saur

and Lee

. Direct Ridership Forecasting. Presented at ITE Conference, Fehr and Peers, Inc., 2004.

12.

Yoder

S. L.

Weseman

S. E.

and DeLaurentiis

. Capital Costs and Ridership Estimates of Personal Rapid Transit. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1704, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 58–67.

13.

Benjamin

Kurauchi

Morikawa

Polydoropoulou

Sasaki

and Ben-Akiva

. Forecasting Paratransit Ridership Using Discrete Choice Models with Explicit Consideration of Availability. In Transportation Research Record 1618, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 60–65.

14.

Benjamin

J. M.

and Sakano

. Equilibrium Model Based on a Micro-foundation for Forecasting Dial-a-Ride Ridership. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1760, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 135–142.

15.

Outwater

M. L.

Castleberry

Shiftan

Ben-Akiva

Zhou

and Kuppam

. Attitudinal Market Segmentation Approach to Mode Choice and Ridership Forecasting: Structural Equation Modeling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 32–42.

16.

Pushkarev

Zupan

J. M.

and Cumella

R. S.

. Urban Rail in America: An Exploration of Criteria for Fixed-Guideway Transit. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1982.

17.

Demery

L. W.

Jr. and Setty

M. D.

. The Recommendations and Forecasts of Pushkarev, Zupan, and Cumella: A Retrospective. Oct. 2004. www.carquinezassociates.com/ptlibrary/trafficdensity/Pushkarev2.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2005.

18.

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. Schuylkill Valley Rail Assessment Study. Norfolk Southern Corporation, Philadelphia, Pa., Jan. 2005.

19.

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. Quakertown-Stony Creek Rail Restoration Study. Bucks County Planning Commission, Doylestown, Pa., Dec. 2000.

20.

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. Track A Extension Feasibility Study, Phase II. Cecil County Office of Planning, Zoning and Parks, Elkton, Md., 2004.

21.

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. Gastonia Rapid Transit Alternatives Study: Corridor and Modal Options, Task 5: Evaluation. City of Gastonia and Gaston Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, Gastonia, N.C., June 2005.

22.

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. 2025 Long-Range Plan. Delaware Transit Corporation, Wilmington, Del., Dec. 2000.

23.

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. Richmond Rail Transit Feasibility Study. Richmond Regional Planning District Commission, Richmond, Va., May 2003.