Explaining Variation in Transit Ridership in U.S. Metropolitan Areas between 1990 and 2000

Abstract

Between 1990 and 2000, transit patronage increased by around 7% in the United States, but there has been wide variation around this mean. Most research attributes variation in ridership change to a combination of socioeconomic and land use factors, which are beyond a transit agency's control, and service and fare policy decisions, which are within an agency's control. A study built on this earlier work by examining ridership change at the metropolitan scale for all metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the United States that had more than 500,000 people at the time of the 2000 census. The study incorporates several measures of service quality in order to evaluate the relative efficacy of policy decisions about service coverage, frequency, and orientation (central business district radial versus multidestination system orientation). The multivariate analysis shows that transit is growing most rapidly in the nontraditional markets of the West but that much of the regional variation is a function of the particular service coverage, frequency, and orientation decisions made by transit agencies in this region. Service coverage and frequency are the most powerful explanatory variables for variation in ridership change among MSAs with 1 million to 5 million people, whereas a multidestination service orientation is the most important explanation for variation in ridership change among MSAs with 500,000 to 1 million people.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pucher

Renaissance for Public Transport in the United States? In Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 1 2002, pp. 33–49.

Stanley

TCRP Research Results Digest No. 4: Transit Ridership Initiative. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.

Stanley

R. G.

and Hyman

. TCRP Research Results Digest No. 69: Evaluation of Recent Ridership Increases. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Taylor

B. D.

and Miller

. Analyzing the Determinants of Transit Ridership Using Two-Stage Least-Squares Regression on National Sample of Urbanized Areas. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Charles River Associates. TCRP Report 27: Building Transit Ridership: An Exploration of Transit's Market Share and the Public Policies That Influence It. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.

Stanley

TCRP Research Results Digest No. 29: Continuing Examination of Successful Transit Ridership Initiatives. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.

Project for Public Spaces, Inc., and Multisystems, Inc. TCRP Report 46: The Role of Transit Amenities and Vehicle Characteristics in Building Transit Ridership. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.

TRL Report 593: The Demand for Public Transport: A Practical Guide. Transport Research Laboratory Ltd., 2004.

Kohn

Factors Affecting Urban Transit Ridership. Proc., Bridging the Gaps Conference, Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, 2000.

10.

Kain

J. F.

and Liu

. Secrets of Success: Assessing the Large Increases in Transit Ridership Achieved by Houston and San Diego Transit Providers. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 33, No. 7/8, 1999, pp. 601–624.

11.

Jones

Urban Transit Policy: An Economic and Political History. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1985.

12.

Meyer

Kain

J. F.

and Wohl

. The Urban Transportation Problem. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.

13.

Mierzejewski

and Ball

. New Findings on Factors Related to Transit Use. In ITE Journal, Feb. 1990, pp. 34–39.

14.

Thompson

G. L.

and Matoff

T. G.

. Keeping Up with the Joneses: Planning for Transit in Decentralizing Regions. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 3 2003, pp. 296–312.

15.

Thompson

G. L.

Brown

J. R.

Sharma

and Scheib

. Where Transit Is Growing: Surprising Results. Florida Planning and Development Lab, 2005.

16.

Alam

B. M.

Assessment of the Influence of Transit Accessibility to Jobs on the Employability of the TANF Recipients: The Case of Broward County, Florida. Dissertation. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Florida State University, 2005.

17.

1990 and 2000 Decennial Census of Population and Housing. U.S. Census Bureau. www.census.gov. Accessed July 1, 2005.

18.

1990 and 2000 Tabulation of Unemployment Rates from the Current Population Survey. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. www.bls.gov/cps. Accessed July 1, 2005.

19.

Florida Transit Information System. Public Transit Office, Florida Department of Transportation. 2004. www.eng.fiu.edu/LCTR/Ftis/ftis.htm. Accessed July 28, 2004.

20.

Thompson

G. L.

Identifying Gainers and Losers from Transit Service Change: A Method Applied to Sacramento. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 18, 1998, pp. 125–136.

21.

Pisarski

Commuting in America II. Eno Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1996.

22.

Pucher

and Renne

. Socioeconomics of Urban Travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 3 2003, pp. 49–78.

23.

Liu

Determinants of Public Transit Ridership: Analysis of Post World War II Trends and Evaluation of Alternative Networks. Doctoral thesis. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge Mass., 1993.