Impact of Public Transit on Employment Status

Abstract

The impact of public transit on employment status of individuals is analyzed. The role of public transportation in employment appears in two policy debates regarding the spatial mismatch hypothesis and the role of public or private mobility to help the unemployed to gain employment. However, research studies dealing with the two debates produced conflicting results, and the impact of public transit has not been fully accounted for in explaining employment outcomes. A study was done to disaggregate analysis to explain employment status of individuals in the Houston, Texas, metropolitan area as a function of the access to public transit, job accessibility by transit, and household car ownership. The results of the study indicate that job accessibility by public transit has significant impacts on employment levels. However, it is questionable if improving physical access to public transit can significantly help the poor, although it may be effective for enhancing the employment levels of individuals with regular access to private vehicles. Although private mobility also appears significant for improving employment status of the economically disadvantaged, job accessibility by public transit has a stronger effect in increasing the levels of employment than private vehicles. The study defies the contention that public transit is helpless for the under-privileged of the society. Therefore, it is important to continue policy efforts in progress to improve regional public transit service.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sanchez

T. W.

Peng

Z.-R.

and Shen

. Transit Mobility, Jobs Access and Low-Income Labor Participation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 7 2004, pp. 1313–1331.

Cervero

Sandoval

and Landis

. Transportation as a Stimulus of Welfare-to-Work: Private Versus Public Mobility. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, 2002, pp. 50–63.

Sanchez

T. W.

The Connection Between Public Transit and Employment: The Cases of Portland and Atlanta. Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 65, No. 3 1999, pp. 284–296.

Blumenberg

and Ong

. Job Accessibility and Welfare Usage: Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 7, No. 4 1998, pp. 639–657.

Kain

J. F.

Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 82, 1968, pp. 175–197.

Taylor

B. D.

and Ong

P. M.

. Spatial Mismatch or Automobile Mismatch? An Examination of Race, Residence and Commuting in U.S. Metropolitan Area. Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 9 1995, pp. 1453–1473.

Martin

R. W.

The Adjustment of Black Residents to Metropolitan Employment Shifts: How Persistent is Spatial Mismatch?

Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 50, 2001, pp. 52–76.

Sjoquist

D. L.

Spatial Mismatch and Social Acceptability. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 50, 2001, pp. 474–490.

Cervero

R. T.

Rood

and Appleyard

. Tracking Accessibility: Employment and Housing Opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A Vol. 31, 1999, pp. 1259–1278.

10.

McLafferty

and Preston

. Spatial Mismatch and Labor Market Segmentation for African American and Latina Women. Economic Geography, Vol. 68, 1992, pp. 406–431.

11.

McLafferty

and Preston

. Spatial Mismatch and Employment in a Decade of Restructuring. Professional Geographer, Vol. 48, No. 4 1996, pp. 417–467.

12.

Ellwood

D. T.

The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Are There Teen-Age Jobs Missing in the Ghetto? In The Black Youth Employment Crisis ( Freeman

R. B.

and Holzer

H. J.

, eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill. 1986.

13.

Cooke

City-Suburb Difference in African American Male Labor Market Achievement. Professional Geographer, Vol. 85, 1996, pp. 458–467.

14.

Ong

Work and Car Ownership Among Welfare Recipients. Social Work Research, Vol. 20, No. 4 1996, pp. 255–262.

15.

Ong

Car Ownership and Welfare-to-Work. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 21, No. 2 2002, pp. 239–252.

16.

Sanchez

T. W.

The Impact of Public Transport on U.S. Metropolitan Wage Inequality. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3 2002, pp. 423–436.

17.

Thompson

G. L.

How Ethnic/Racial Groups Value Transit Accessibility: Modeling Inferences from Dade County. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., 1997.

18.

Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Analyzing Transit Options for Small Urban Communities—Analysis Methods. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979.

19.

Zhang

Shen

and Sussman

. Job Accessibility in the San Juan Metropolitan Region: Implications for Rail Transit Benefit Analysis. In Transportation Research Record 1618, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 22–31.