This paper addresses some of the notable improvements in the durability of concrete for bridge structures, mainly decks, and of pavements by the Virginia Department of Transportation since 1938. These improvements are intended to extend service life with minimal maintenance. Improvements have been made in the design, material ingredients, proportioning, and construction practices for bridge structures and concrete pavements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisJ., NorthM., and NewlonH.. Bridge Deck Performance in Virginia. VHRC 70-R39. Virginia Highway Research Council, Charlottesville, 1971.
2.
SprinkelM. M.Effective Field Use of High-Range Water-Reduced Concrete. VHTRC 82-R24. Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1981.
3.
OzyildirimC.Air-Void Characteristics of Concretes in Different Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1893, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 70–74.
4.
OzyildirimC.Evaluation of Experimental Installation of Fly Ash Concrete in Louisa. VHTRC 79-R52. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1979.
5.
OzyildirimC.Alternatives to Type II Cement. VHTRC 79-R3. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1978.
6.
OzyildirimC., and WalkerH.. Evaluation of Hydraulic Cement Concretes Containing Slag Added at the Mixer. VHTRC 86-R1. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1985.
7.
OzyildirimC.Investigation of Concrete Containing Slag: Hampton River Bridge. VHTRC 86-R39. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1986.
8.
SprinkelM. M.Twenty-Year Performance of Latex-Modified Concrete Overlays. In Transportation Research Record 1335, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 27–35.
9.
OzyildirimC.A Field Investigation of a Concrete Overlay Containing Silica Fume on Route 50 Over Opequon Creek. VTRC 93-R15. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1993.
10.
ElfinoM., OzyildirimC., and SteeleR.. CRCP in Virginia: Lessons Learned.Proc., 7th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, Orlando, Fla., 2001.
11.
NewlonH. N., and SherwoodW. D.. Methods for Reducing Expansion of Concrete Caused by Alkali-Carbonate Rock Reactions. In Highway Research Record No. 45, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1964, pp. 134–150.
12.
LaneD. S.Alkali–Silica Reactivity in Virginia. VTRC 94-R17. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1994.
13.
ClearK. C.Effectiveness of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel.Concrete International, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1992, pp. 33–38.
14.
NewlonH. N.A Survey to Determine the Impact of Changes in Specifications and Construction Practices on the Performance of Concrete in Bridge Decks. VHRC 73-R59. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1974.
15.
GraybealB. A., and HartmanJ. L.. Construction of an Optimized UHPC Vehicle Bridge. ACI SP-228.Proc., 7th International Symposium on the Utilization of High Strength/High-Performance Concrete, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 2005, pp. 1109–1118.
16.
LaneD. S., and OzyildirimC.. Combinations of Pozzolans and Ground, Granulated, Blast-Furnace Slag for Durable Hydraulic Cement Concrete. VTRC 00-R1. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2000.
17.
OzyildirimC.Performance of First Structure Built with High-Performance Concrete in Virginia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1798, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 43–50.
18.
OzyildirimC., and GomezJ. P.. High-Performance Concrete in the Richlands Bridge in Virginia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1698, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 17–23.
19.
SprinkelM. M., and OzyildirimC.. Shrinkage of High-Performance Concrete Overlays on Route 60 in Virginia. In Transportation Research Record 1610, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 15–19.
20.
OzyildirimC.Evaluation of High-Performance Concrete Pavement in Newport News, Virginia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1775, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 118–124.
21.
HolmT. A.Lightweight Concrete and Aggregates. STP 169C. In Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials.American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa., 1994, pp. 522–532.
22.
ClemenaG. C., and VirmaniY. P.. Comparing the Chloride Resistances of Reinforcing Bars.Concrete International, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2004, pp. 39–49.
23.
McKeelW. T.Evaluation of Deck Durability on Continuous Beam Highway Bridges. VHTRC 85-R32. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1985.
24.
OzyildirimC., MoenC., and HladkyS.. Investigation of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete for Use in Transportation Structures. In Transportation Research Record 1574, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 63–70.
25.
SprinkelM. M., and OzyildirimC.. Evaluation of Hydraulic Cement Concrete Overlays Placed on Three Pavements in Virginia.Proc., 7th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, Orlando, Florida, 2001.
26.
OzyildirimC.Virginia Department of Transportation Early Experience with Self-Consolidating Concrete. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1914, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 81–84.
27.
HughesC. S., and OzyildirimC.. End-Result Specification for Hydraulic Cement Concrete. VTRC 05-R29. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2005.
