Effects of Bus Stop Consolidation on Passenger Activity and Transit Operations

Abstract

This research addressed changes in passenger activity and operating performance after implementation of a bus stop consolidation project at TriMet, the regional transit provider for the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area. Extensive use was made of archived bus operations and passenger activity data from TriMet's automated Bus Dispatch System. Changes in passenger activity and operating performance in route segments where stop consolidation occurred were related to changes in adjacent route segments where stops were not consolidated. The findings indicated that bus stop consolidation had no significant effects on passenger activity, whereas bus running times improved by nearly 6%. Running time improvements may have been limited by insufficient schedule adjustments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kittelson and Associates, Inc. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Bowman

and Turnquist

. Service Frequency, Schedule Reliability and Passenger Wait Times at Transit Stops. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 15, No. 6 1981, pp. 465–471.

Sterman

and Schofer

. Factors Affecting Reliability of Urban Bus Services. Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 102, No. 1 1976, pp. 147–159.

Turnquist

A Model for Investigating the Effect of Service Frequency and Reliability on Bus Passenger Waiting Times. In Transportation Research Record 663, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 70–73.

Benn

Bus Route Evaluation Standards. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995.

Mohring

Schroeter

and Wiboonchutikula

. The Value of Waiting Time, Travel Time, and a Seat on a Bus. Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1 1987, pp. 40–56.

Furth

P. G.

and Rahbee

A. B.

. Optimal Bus Stop Spacing Through Dynamic Programming and Geographic Modeling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1731, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 15–22.

van Nes

and Bovy

P. H. L.

. Importance of Objectives in Urban Transit-Network Design. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1735, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 25–34.

Vuchic

and Newell

. Rapid Transit Interstation Spacings for Minimum Travel Time. Transportation Science, Vol. 2, No. 2 1968, pp. 303–339.

10.

Wirasinghe

S. C.

and Ghoneim

N. S.

. Spacing of Bus Stops for Many to Many Travel Demand. Transportation Science, Vol. 15, No. 3 1981, pp. 210–221.

11.

TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.

12.

NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 69: Bus Route and Schedule Guidelines. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980.

13.

Tri-Met Service Standards. Tri-County Metropolitan District of Oregon, Portland, Ore., 1989.

14.

Reilly

J. M.

Transit Service Design and Operation Practices in Western European Countries. In Transportation Research Record: 1604, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 3–8.

15.

Sale

and Green

. Operation Costs and Performance of American Public Transit Systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 45, No. 1 1979, pp. 22–27.

16.

Murray

Strategic Analysis of Public Transport Coverage. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 35, No. 3 2001, pp. 175–188.

17.

Kemp

M. A.

Some Evidence of Transit Demand Elasticities. Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 1 1973, pp. 25–51.

18.

Pushkarev

B. S.

and Zupan

J. M.

. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind., 1977.

19.

Lago

A. M.

and Mayworm

P. D.

. Transit Service Elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 15, No. 2 1981, pp. 99–119.

20.

Abkowitz

and Tozzi

. Research Contributing to Managing Transit Service Reliability. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 21, No. 1 1987, pp. 47–65.

21.

Turnquist

Strategies for Improving Reliability of Bus Transit Service. In Transportation Research Record 818, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 7–13.

22.

Levinson

H. S.

Analyzing Transit Travel Time Performance. In Transportation Research Record 915, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 1–6.

23.

Saka

A. A.

Model for Determining Optimum Bus-Stop Spacing in Urban Areas. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 3 2001, pp. 195–199.

24.

Koffman

Automatic Passenger Counting Data: Better Schedules Improve On-Time Performance. In Fifth International Workshop on Computer-Aided Scheduling of Public Transport, Springer-Verlag, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1990.

25.

Chien

S. I.

Qin

and Liu

. Optimal Bus Stop Locations for Improving Transit Accessibility. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.

26.

Kuah

G. K.

and Perl

. Optimization of Feeder Bus Routes and Bus Stop Spacing. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 3 1988, pp. 341–354.

27.

Murray

and Wu

. Accessibility Tradeoffs in Public Transit Planning. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1 2003, pp. 93–107.

28.

Schrank

and Lomax

. The 2003 Annual Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Tex., 2003.

29.

Strathman

Dueker

Kimpel

Gerhart

Turner

Taylor

Callas

and Griffen

. Service Reliability Impacts of Computer-Aided Dispatching and Automatic Location Technology: A Tri-Met Case Study. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3 2000, pp. 85–102.

30.

Furth

P. G.

Hemily

B. J.

Muller

T. H. J.

and Strathman

J. G.

. TCRP Web Document 23: Uses of Archived AVL-APC Data to Improve Transit Performance and Management: Review and Potential. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.

31.

Bus Stop Guidelines 2002. Tri-County Metropolitan District of Oregon, Portland, Ore., 2002.

32.

Route Performance Report. Tri-County Metropolitan District of Oregon, Portland, Ore., 2000.

33.

Wonnacott

and Wonnacott

. Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972.

34.

Levinson

H. S.

and Brown-West

. Estimating Bus Ridership. In Transportation Research Record 994, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 8–12.

35.

Strathman

Kimpel

Deuker

Gerhart

and Callas

. Evaluation of Transit Operations: Data Applications of Tri-Met's Automated Bus Dispatching System. Transportation, Vol. 29, No. 3 2002, pp. 321–345.