Real-Time Detection of Crash-Prone Conditions at Freeway High-Crash Locations

Abstract

Because of growing concern over traffic safety and rising congestion costs, recent research efforts have been redirected from the traditional reactive traffic management (crash detection and clearance) toward on-line proactive solutions for crash prevention. Such a solution for high-crash areas is explored by the identification of the most relevant real-time traffic metrics and the incorporation of them in a model to estimate crash likelihood. Unlike earlier attempts, this model is based on a unique detection and surveillance infrastructure deployed on the freeway section that has the highest crash rate in Minnesota. State-of-the-art infrastructure allowed the video capture of 110 live crashes, crash-related traffic events, and contributing factors while measuring traffic variables (e.g., individual vehicle speeds and headways) over each lane in several places in the study area. This crash-rich database was combined with visual observations and analyzed extensively to identify the most relevant real-time traffic measurements for detecting and developing an on-line model of crash-prone conditions. This model successfully establishes a relationship between quickly evolving real-time traffic conditions and crash likelihood. Testing was performed in real time during 10 days not previously used in model development, under varied weather and traffic conditions. The crash likelihood model—and, in turn, the detection algorithm—succeeded in detecting 58% of the crashes, with a 6.8 false decision rate.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

2003 Annual Assessment of Motor Vehicle Crashes. NHTSA Technical Report HS-809 755. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Blincoe

L. J.

Seay

A. G.

Zaloshnja

Miller

T. R.

Romano

E. O.

Luchter

and Spicer

R. S.

. The Economic Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2000. NHTSA Technical Report HS-809 446. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2002.

2002 Minnesota Motor Vehicle Crash Facts. Minnesota Department of Safety, St. Paul, 2003.

International Road Traffic and Accident Database, 2002. Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt), Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, 2003.

Schrank

and Lomax

. The 2004 urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute, San Antonio, Tex., 2004.

Helman

D. L.

Traffic Incident Management. Public Roads, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2004.

Martinez

Crashes Aren't Accidents (NHTSA campaign material). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 1997.

Lee

Saccomanno

and Hellinga

. Analysis of Crash Precursors on Instrumented Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 1–8.

Madanat

and Liu

. A Prototype System for Real-Time Incident Likelihood Prediction. IDEA Project Final Report (ITS-2). TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.

10.

J. S.

and Ritchie

S. G.

. Real-Time Estimation of Freeway Accident Likelihood. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.

11.

Freeway Volume-Crash Summary, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Systems and Research Section, Office of Traffic Engineering, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2002.

12.

Hourdakis

Michalopoulos

P. G.

and Morris

. Deployment of Wireless Mobile Detection and Surveillance for Data-Intensive Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1900, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 140–148.

13.

Shankar

Mannering

and Barfield

. Effect of Roadway and Environmental Factors on Rural Freeway Accident Frequencies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 3 1995, pp. 371–389.

14.

Hadi

M. A.

Aruldhas

Chow

L.-F.

and Wattleworth

J. A.

. Estimating Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Various Highway Types Using Negative Binomial Regression. In Transportation Research Record 1500, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 169–177.

15.

Vogt

and Bared

. Accident Models for Two-Lane Rural Segments and Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1635, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 18–29.

16.

Edwards

J. B.

The Relationship Between Road Accident Severity and Recorded Weather. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 29, No. 4 1998, pp. 249–262.

17.

Golob

T. F.

and Recker

. Relationship Between Urban Freeway Accidents, Traffic Flow, Weather and Lighting Conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 4 2003, pp. 342–353.

18.

Garber

N. J.

and Gadiraju

. Factors Affecting Speed Variance and Its Influence on Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1213, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 64–71.

19.

Miaou

S. P.

The Relationship Between Truck Accidents and Geometric Design of Road Sections: Poisson Versus Negative Binomial Regressions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 4 1994, pp. 471–482.

20.

Lee

Hellinga

and Saccomanno

. Real-Time Crash Prediction Model for Application to Crash Prevention in Freeway Traffic. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 67–77.

21.

Abdel-Aty

Uddin

Pande

Abdalla

M. F.

and Hsia

. Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 88–95.

22.

Abdel-Aty

and Abdalla

M. F.

. Linking Roadway Geometrics and Real-Time Traffic Characteristics to Model Daytime Freeway Crashes: Generalized Estimating Equations for Correlated Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 106–115.

23.

May

A. D.

Traffic Flow Fundamentals. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.

24.

Phillips

W. F.

A Kinetic Model for Traffic Flow with Continuum Implications. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 5, 1979, pp. 131–138.

25.

Drew

D. R.

Traffic Flow Theory and Control. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.

26.

Subramaniam

V. K.

Detection of Undesirable Traffic Flow Conditions. Master's thesis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2001.

27.

Garg

Data Recording and Analysis for Detecting Accident Prone Conditions. Master's thesis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2004.

28.

Herman

Montroll

E. W.

Potts

R. B.

and Rothery

R. W.

. Traffic Dynamics: Analysis of Stability in Car Following. Operations Research, Vol. 7, 1959, pp. 86–106.

29.

Helly

and Baker

P. G.

. Acceleration Noise in a Congested Signalized Environment Proc., Third International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, New York, 1965.

30.

Greenshields

B. D.

Quality of Traffic Flow. In Quality and Theory of Traffic Flow a Symposium. Bureau of Highway Traffic, Yale University, New Haven, Conn., 1961, pp. 3–40.

31.

McCullagh

and Nelder

J. A.

. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, New York, 1989.

32.

Cook

D. R.

and Weisberg

. Applied Regression Including Computing and Graphics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999.

33.

Hosmer

D. W.

and Lemeshow

. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989.

34.

Marshal

R. E.

and Mahack

. Determinants of Headway Selection. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1998.