Commodity Distribution Model Incorporating Spatial Interactions for Urban Freight Movement

Abstract

The commodity distribution model proposed in this paper is developed in such a way that the movement of commodities is explained as an outcome of their flow through several freight agents in a supply chain. As commodity flow is fundamentally determined by demand, the proposed model was developed from a discrete choice model that considered the individual behavior of a customer to decide the suppliers from which to purchase and the amount of commodity to acquire from each of them. The model not only takes into account the interplay between shipper and customer in a supply chain but also captures the spatial interactions among alternatives and among customers, because spatial effects generally affect customer preference. In this study, several model specifications were developed and compared, with and without incorporating spatial interactions. The empirical results of the model, which were applied to analyze the urban commodity distribution in the Tokyo metropolitan area, indicate that integrating both spatial interactions among alternatives and among customers statistically improves the model's performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Holguin-Veras

and Thorson

Trip Length Distributions in Commodity-Based and Trip-Based Freight Demand Modeling: Investigations of Relationships. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1707, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 37–48.

Taniguchi

Thompson

R. G.

Yamada

and Duin

R. V.

. City Logistics: Network Modeling and Intelligent Transport Systems. Pergamon, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2001.

Ashtakala

and Murthy

A. S. N.

. Optimized Gravity Models for Commodity Transportation, Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 114, No. 4 1988, pp. 393–408.

Tavasszy

L. A.

and Van Der Rest

. Scenario-Wise Analysis of Transport and Logistics Systems with a SMILE, Selected Proc., 8th World Conference on Transportation Research, 1999, pp. 409–419.

Sivakumar

and Bhat

. Fractional Split-Distribution Model for Statewide Commodity-Flow Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1790, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 80–88.

McFadden

Winston

and Boersch-Supan

. Joint Estimation of Freight Transportation Decisions Under Nonrandom Sampling. In Analytical Studies in Transport Economics ( Daugherty

, ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985, pp. 137–157.

Abdelwahab

W. M.

and Sargious

M. A.

. A Simultaneous Decision-Making Approach to Model the Demand for Freight Transportation, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 3 1985, pp. 515–520.

Holguin-Veras

Revealed Preference Analysis of Commercial Vehicle Choice Process, Journal of Transportation Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 128, No. 4 2002, pp. 336–346.

Boerkamps

J. H. K.

Van Binsbergen

A. J.

and Bovy

P. H. L.

. Modeling Behavioral Aspects of Urban Freight Movement in Supply Chains. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1725, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 17–25.

10.

Boerkamps

J. H. K.

and Binsbergen

A. J. V.

. GoodTrip—A New Approach for Modeling and Evaluation of Urban Goods Distribution. Proc., 1st International Conference on City Logistics, Cairns, Australia, 1999, pp. 175–186.

11.

Bradlow

E. T.

Bronnenberg

Russell

G. J.

Arora

Bell

D. R.

Deepak

S. D.

Hofstede

Sismeiro

Thomadsen

and Yang

. Spatial Models in Marketing, The Spatial Models in Marketing Seminar at 6th Invitational Choice Symposium, June 2004.

12.

Train

K. E.

Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2003.

13.

Walker

Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification, In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 86–98.

14.

Walker

Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.

15.

McMillen

D. P.

Probit with Spatial Autocorrelation, Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 32, No. 3 1992, pp. 335–348.

16.

Bhat

C. R.

and Guo

A Mixed Spatially Correlated Logit Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 147–168.

17.

Mohammadian

Haider

and Kanaroglou

P. S.

. Incorporating Spatial Dependencies in Random Parameter Discrete Choice Models. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.

18.

Ben-Akiva

Bolduc

and Walker

. Specification, Identifications, and Estimation of the Logit Kernel (or Continuous Mixed Logit) Model. Working Paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.

19.

Miaou

and Sui

. Implications of Changing Demographic and Socioeconomic Structures on Highway Safety: A Texas Initiative. Final Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Austin, 2004.