Radius Requirements for Trucks on Three-Dimensional Reverse Horizontal Curves with Intermediate Tangents

Abstract

Minimum radius requirements for reverse horizontal curves are currently based on the design of each arc as a separate simple horizontal curve on flat terrain, with the effects of reverse horizontal curvature and vertical alignment being ignored. This paper establishes minimum radius requirements for trucks on three-dimensional (3-D) reverse horizontal curves with intermediate tangents on the basis of vehicle stability. With vehicle simulation software, vehicle dynamics were recorded for the base case of two-dimensional simple curves and for reverse curves superimposed with different vertical alignments (upgrade, downgrade, crest curve, and sag curve). The simulation was run for two maximum superelevation rates, three design vehicles, and different vertical grades. Two mathematical models were developed for flat and 3-D reverse curves. The models provided the minimum radius of the sharper arc of the reverse curve as a function of design speed, maximum superelevation, ratio of flatter to sharper curve radius, design vehicle, and intermediate tangent length. The results showed that an increase in the minimum radius of existing design guides (ranging from 5% to 27%) was required to compensate for the effects of reverse curvature and vertical alignment. The required increase can be reduced by using longer intermediate tangents. Design requirements for the spiral length of reverse curves are also presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lamm

Psarianos

and Mailaender

Highway Design and Traffic Safety Engineering Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999.

Special Report 265: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Rating System for Rollover Resistance: An Assessment. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, 147 pp.

National Transportation Statistics 2002. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 1999.

Hassan

Easa

S. M.

and Abd El Halim

A. O.

State of the Art of Three-Dimensional Highway Geometric Design. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 3 1998, pp. 500–511.

Harwood

D. W.

and Mason

J. M.

Jr . Horizontal Curve Design for Passenger Cars and Trucks. In Transportation Research Record 1445, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 22–33.

Hassan

Easa

S. M.

and Abd El Halim

A. O.

Analytical Model for Sight Distance Analysis on Three-Dimensional Highway Alignments. In Transportation Research Record 1523, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 1–10.

Gibreel

G. M.

Easa

S. M.

and El-Dimeery

I. A.

Prediction of Operating Speed on Three-Dimensional Highway Alignments. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, pp. 21–29.

10.

Easa

Dabbour

and Ali

Three-Dimensional Model for Stop-Control Intersection Sight Distance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 2 2004, pp. 261–270.

11.

Easa

S. M.

and Dabbour

Design Radius Requirements for Simple Horizontal Curves on 3-D Alignments. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 6 2003, pp. 1022–1033.

12.

Dabbour

Easa

S. M.

and Abd El Halim

A. O.

Radius Requirements for Reverse Horizontal Curves on 3–D Alignments. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 5 2004, pp. 610–620.

13.

Sayers

M. W.

Vehicle Dynamics Programs for Roadway and Roadside Studies. UMTRI-98-20-1. Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1999.