Desirable Length of Spiral Curves for Two-Lane Rural Roads

Abstract

Most design standards recommend the use of spiral curves in the transition design. The advantages usually connected with their use are a gradual increase in the centrifugal force, a convenient arrangement for superelevation, and a satisfactory roadway appearance. However, some studies show a potentially negative effect of a long spiral transition on the driver's curve perception and safety. An analysis conducted on paths surveyed along 12 transitions with and without spiral curves confirmed the negative effect of excessive spiral length on driver behavior. The results of this analysis showed that the most desirable spiral length, which offers advantages in comparison with a tangent-to-curve transition, is equal to the distance traveled during the steering time. Therefore, a model to estimate the desirable spiral length for transitions of sharp horizontal curves on two-lane rural roads was developed on the basis of the data collected in three studies. Starting from the radius of the impending curve, the model calculates the desirable spiral length and gives a good description of real driver behavior, as observed in field surveys. The choice of the spiral length based on this model appears to be useful because the estimated length is consistent with the real distance traveled by the vehicle during the steering action, and this correspondence ensures optimal operating conditions for drivers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Stewart

and Chudworth

A Remedy for Accidents at Bends. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 31, No. 2 1990, pp. 88–93.

Tom

G. K. J.

Accidents on Spiral Transition Curves. ITE Journal, Vol. 65, No. 9, Sept. 1995, pp. 49–53.

Perco

and Crisman

Influence of Spiral Length on Path of Vehicle Entering a Curve. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Perco

Comparison Between Vehicle Paths Along Transition Sections With and Without Spiral Curves. Proc., 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, Ill., 2005.

Norme funzionali e geometriche per la costruzione delle strade. D.M. 05/11/2001, Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation, Rome, Italy, 2001.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Road Geometry: Highway Link Design. Departmental Standard TD 9/93. Department of Transport, London, United Kingdom, 1993.

Richtlinien für die Anlage von Strassen: Linienführung RAS-L. Forschungsgesellschaft für Strassen-und Verkehrswesen, Bonn, Germany, 1995.

Norm SN 640–100a, Elemente der horizontalen Linienführung. Vereinigung Schweizerrischer Strassenfachleute, Zurich, Switzerland, 1981.

10.

Rural Road Design: Guide to the Geometric Design of Rural Roads. Austroads, Sydney, Australia, 1997.

11.

Aménagement des Routes Principales: Recommandations Techniques pour la Conception Générale et la Géometrie de la Route. SETRA, Ministere del'Equipement, Direction des Routes, Bagneux, France, 1994.

12.

Bonneson

J. A.

NCHRP Report 439: Superelevation Distribution Methods and Transition Designs. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

13.

Godthelp

Vehicle Control During Curve Driving. Human Factors, Vol. 28, No. 2 1986, pp. 211–221.

14.

Land

M. F.

and Lee

D. N.

Where We Look When We Steer. Nature, Vol. 369, June 1994, pp. 742–744.

15.

McLean

and Hoffman

E. R.

The Effects of Restricted Preview on Driver Steering Control and Performance. Human Factors, Vol. 15, No. 4 1973, pp. 421–430.

16.

Allen

R. W.

O'Hanlon

J. F.

and McRuer

D. T.

Driver's Visibility Requirements for Roadway Delineation. Report FHWA-RD-77–165, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1977.

17.

Cavallo

Brun-Dei

Laya

and Neboit

Perception and Anticipation in Negotiating Curves: The Role of Driving Experience. Vision in Vehicle II, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1988, pp. 365–374.

18.

Hildreth

E. C.

Boer

E. R.

Beusmans

J. M.

and Royden

C. S.

From Vision to Action: Experiments and Models of Steering Control During Driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 26, No. 3 2000, pp. 1106–1132.

19.

Land

M. F.

and Horwood

Which Parts of the Road Guide Steering?

Nature, Vol. 337, Sept. 1995, pp. 339–340.

20.

Riemersma

The Effects of Transition Curves and Superelevation on the Perception of Road-Curve Characteristics. TNO Report C-18. TNO Institute for Perception, Soesterberg, Netherlands, 1989.

21.

Yerpez

and Ferrandez

Caracteristiques Routieres et Securite. Synthese INRETS No.2, Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Securite, Arcueil, France, 1986.

22.

Crisman

Marchionna

and Perco

Photogrammetric Surveys for the Definition of a Model for Passing Sight Distance Computation. Proc., 2nd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Mainz, Germany, 2000.

23.

Glennon

Neuman

and Leish

Safety and Operational Considerations for Design of Rural Highways Curves. Report FHWA RD-86–035. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1985.

24.

Stewart

The Case of the Left-Hand Bend. The Highway Engineer, Vol. 24, No. 6 1977, pp. 12–17.

25.

Crisman

Marchionna

Perco

Robba

and Roberti

Operating Speed Prediction Model for Two-Lane Rural Roads. Proc., 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, Ill., 2005.

26.

Perco

and Robba

Evaluation of the Deceleration Rate for the Operating Speed-Profile Model. Proc., 3rd International SIIV Congress, Bari, Italy, 2005.

27.

Lamm

and Choueiri

E. M.

Recommendations for Evaluating Horizontal Design Consistency Based on Investigations in the State of New York. In Transportation Research Record 1122, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 68–78.