Potential Single-Occupancy Vehicle Demand for High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use of high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes as an alternative to high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes to help manage the increasing demand for travel. HOT lanes combine pricing and vehicle occupancy restrictions to optimize the demand for HOV lanes. As two of the five HOT lanes in the world, the HOT lane facilities in Houston, Texas, require peak period travelers in vehicles with two occupants to pay a toll to use the lanes. During other periods of the day, two-occupant vehicles can use the lanes for free. Single-occupancy vehicles (SOVs) are never allowed. There was an opportunity to increase the usage of these HOT lanes by allowing SOV travelers to use the lanes during the off-peak periods, for an appropriate toll. This research examined the potential SOV demand for HOV lane use during the off-peak periods from the Katy Freeway and Northwest Freeway general purpose lane travelers. Of course, allowing SOVs on the HOV lanes is a multifaceted policy decision that has not been tackled by the operating agencies, and this research simply estimates the demand if such an option existed. This included estimating two important factors that influenced travelers’ potential use of the HOV lanes: their value of travel time savings (VTTS) and their value of penalty for changing their travel schedule (VPCS). It was found that respondents had VTTS approximately 45% of their hourly wage rate and VPCS approximately 3% of their hourly wage rate. Combining this information with current travel time savings and available capacity on the HOV lanes, it was found that approximately 2,000 SOV travelers per day would pay a combined total of $4,500 to use the HOV lanes during the off-peak periods.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schrank

and Lomax

The 2004 Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex., 2004. mobility.tamu.edu. Accessed Feb. 20, 2004.

Domencich

and McFadden

D. L.

Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1975.

Explaining High-Occupancy Toll Lane Use. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 6, No. 1 2001, pp. 61–74.

Burris

M. W.

and Appiah

Examination of Houston's QuickRide Participants by Frequency of QuickRide Usage. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1864, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 22–30.

Burris

M. W.

and Stockton

B. R.

HOT Lanes in Houston—Six Years of Experience. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2004.

Jiang

and Morikawa

Theoretical Analysis on the Variation of Value of Travel Time Savings. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 551–571.

Brownstone

and Small

K. A.

Valuing Time and Reliability: Assessing the Evidence from Road Pricing Demonstrations. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003.

Small

K. A.

Urban Transportation Economics. Hardwood Academic Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa., 1992.

Calfee

and Winston

The Value of Automobile Travel Time: Implications for Congestion Policy. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1 1998, pp. 83–102.

10.

Small

K. A.

Trip Scheduling in Urban Transportation Analysis. American Economic Review, Vol. 82, No. 2 1992, pp. 482–486.

11.

Arnott

de Palma

and Lindsey

Schedule Delay and Departure Time Decisions with Heterogeneous Commuters In Transportation Research Record 1197, TRB National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 56–67.

12.

Winn

J. R.

An Analysis of Casual Carpool Passenger Behavior in Houston, Texas. Master's thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 2005.