Comprehensive Evaluation of New Integrated Freeway Ramp Control Strategy

Abstract

A new integrated ramp control strategy, recently deployed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, is evaluated. This strategy, stratified zone metering (SZM), takes into account real-time ramp demand and queue size information and aims to strike a balance between two competing objectives: improving freeway efficiency and preventing excessive ramp delays. In this study, the SZM strategy was compared to the earlier ZONE metering strategy as well as to the no-control alternative. Comprehensive metrics were generated through rigorous microsimulation to assess critical aspects of the strategy's performance. The evaluation results are consistent with qualitative field observations and confirm that SZM strategy improves freeway efficiency when compared with the no-control alternative, reduces freeway travel time and delay, improves freeway speed, smooths freeway flow, and reduces the number of stops. More important, excessive queue spillbacks and ramp delays were significantly reduced under SZM control when compared with the earlier ZONE metering strategy. However, the nonrestrictive metering rates under SZM may cause the freeway proper to be overloaded; this leads to compromised freeway performance as compared with the more restrictive ramp control. This is especially true for heavy traffic demands, when higher ramp volumes are allowed on the freeway.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnold

E. D.

Ramp Metering: A Review of the Literature. Report VTRC 99-TAR5. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Richmond, 1998.

Cambridge Systematics. Twin Cities Ramp Meter Evaluation. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2001.

Elefteriadou

Freeway Merging Operations: A Probabilistic Approach. Proc., Eighth International Federation of Automatic Control Symposium on Transportation Systems, Chania, Greece, 1997, pp. 1351–1356.

Papageorgiou

Hadj-Salem

and Middelham

ALINEA Local Ramp Metering: Summary of Field Results. In Transportation Research Record 1603, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 90–98.

Zhang

and Levinson

Optimal Freeway Ramp Control Without Origin-Destination Information. Transportation Research B, Vol. 38, No. 10 2003, pp. 869–887.

Lau

MnDOT Ramp Metering Algorithm. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1996.

Hourdakis

and Michalopoulos

P. G.

Evaluation of Ramp Control Effectiveness in Two Twin Cities Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1811, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 21–29.

Xin

Michalopoulos

P. G.

Hourdakis

and Lau

Minnesota's New Ramp Control Strategy: Design Overview and Preliminary Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1867, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 69–79.

Chu

and Yang

Optimization of ALINEA Ramp-Metering Control. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

10.

Wang

J. J.

and May

A. D.

Computer Model for Optimal Freeway On-Ramp Control. In Highway Research Record 469, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1973, pp. 16–25.

11.

Wattleworth

J. A.

and Berry

D. S.

Peak-Period Control of a Freeway System—Some Theoretical Investigations. In Highway Research Record 89, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1965, pp. 1–25.

12.

Yuan

L. S.

and Kreer

J. B.

Adjustment of Freeway Ramp Metering Rates to Balance Entrance Ramp Queues. Transportation Research, Vol. 5, 1971, pp. 127–133.

13.

Isaksen

and Payne

H. J.

Suboptimal Control of Linear Systems by Augmentation with Application to Freeway Traffic Regulation. IEEE Transactions Automatic Control, Vol. 18, 1973, pp. 210–219.

14.

Papageorgiou

Application of Automatic Control Concepts in Traffic Flow Modeling and Control. Springer, New York, 1983.

15.

Papageorgiou

Blosseville

J.-M.

and Habib

H.-S.

Modeling and Real-Time Control of Traffic Flow on the Southern Part of Boulevard Peripherique in Paris: Part II: Coordinated on Ramp Metering. Transportation Research A, Vol. 24, 1990, pp. 361–370.

16.

Papageorgiou

Hadj-Salem

and Blosseville

J.-M.

ALINEA: A Local Feedback Control Law for On Ramp Metering. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 58–64.

17.

Zhang

Ritchie

and Lo

A Local Neural Network Controller for Freeway Ramp Metering. Proc., Seventh Symposium on Transportation Systems Theory and Applications Adv. Technol., Tianjing, China, 1994.

18.

Stephanedes

and Chang

K. K.

Optimal Control of Freeway Corridors. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 119, 1993, pp. 504–514.

19.

Zhang

Ritchie

and Recker

Some General Results on the Optimal Ramp Control Problem. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 4, No. 2 1996, pp. 51–69.

20.

Chang

T. H.

and Li

Z. Y.

Optimization of Mainline Traffic via an Adaptive Coordinated Ramp-Metering Control Model with Dynamic OD Estimation. Transportation Research C, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 99–120.

21.

Kwon

Nanduri

and Ambaipudi

Capacity Analysis for Dynamic Bottlenecks and Alternative Concepts for Coordinated Ramp Metering Operations. Report Mn/RC-2002–09. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2002.

22.

Bogenberger

and May

A. D.

Advanced Coordinated Traffic Responsive Ramp Metering Strategies. California PATH, Berkeley, 1999.

23.

Barceló

Ferrer

J. L.

and Grau

AIMSUN2 and the GETRAM Simulation Environment. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain, 1994.

24.

Barceló

Ferrer

J. L.

Garcia

Florian

and Le Saux

Parallelization of Microscopic Traffic Simulation for ATT Systems Analysis. In Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modeling ( Marcotte

and Nguyen

, eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, 1998.

25.

Barceló

Microscopic Traffic Simulation: A Tool for the Analysis and Assessment of ITS Systems. Presented at Highway Capacity Committee Half-Year Meeting, Lake Tahoe, Calif., 2001.

26.

Stroustrup

The C++ Programming Language, 3rd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1997.

27.

Hourdakis

Michalopoulos

P. G.

and Kottommannil

Practical Procedure for Calibrating Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1852, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 130–139.

28.

Theil

Economic Forecasts and Policy. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961.