Validating Dynamic Message Sign Freeway Travel Time Messages with Ground Truth Geospatial Data

Abstract

U.S. transportation agencies have invested more than $300 million in dynamic message sign (DMS) systems for communicating important messages to travelers, including weather conditions, incidents, construction, and homeland security and AMBER alerts. Recent FHWA policy encourages states to use their DMS infrastructure more effectively by displaying reliable travel-time information along freeway corridors. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), which maintains a freeway surveillance system in the Portland metropolitan area, calculates and reports travel-time estimates derived from inductive loop detector data. These estimates can be reported via 18 DMS and other traveler information systems but are displayed on a limited basis at key junction points during peak periods. Results are presented of an evaluation of ODOT's travel-time reporting capabilities by comparing the ODOT travel-time estimates with probe vehicle (ground truth) travel times. The freeway network was divided into 17 key corridors, and 87 probe vehicle runs were collected under various traffic conditions with handheld Global Positioning System devices. This evaluation used the regional transportation data archive, Portland Regional Transportation Archive Listing, to generate the ODOT travel-time estimates. Probe estimates were compared to travel estimates on the corridors with a paired t-test. The evaluation found that travel times on a majority of links were reasonably accurate under most traffic conditions but were affected by the presence of an incident or by poor detector placement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Meehan

and Rupert

Putting Travelers in the Know. Public Roads, Vol. 68, No. 3, Nov.–Dec. 2004, pp. 38–43.

Panaiti

Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) Recommended Practice and Guidance. FHWA, July 16, 2004. www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/travelinfo/resources/cms_rept/travtime.htm#_ftn1.

Cortes

C. E.

Lavanya

J.-S.

and Jayakrishnan

General-Purpose Methodology for Estimating Link Travel Time with Multiple-Point Detection of Traffic. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1802, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 181–189.

El-Geneidy

and Bertini

R. L.

Toward Validation of Freeway Loop Detector Speed Measurements Using Transit Probe Data. Proc., Seventh Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, D.C., IEEE, 2004.

Hellinga

Improving Freeway Speed Estimates from Single-Loop Detectors. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 1 2002, pp. 58–67.

Coifman

Improved Velocity Estimation Using Single Loop Detectors. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, No. 10 2001, pp. 863–880.

Zhang

and Rice

J. A.

Short-Term Travel Time Prediction. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 11, No. 3 2003, pp. 187–210.

van Lint

J. W. C.

and Van der Zijpp

N. J.

Improving a Travel-Time Estimation Algorithm by Using Dual Loop Detectors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1855, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 41–48.

Coifman

Estimating Travel Times and Vehicle Trajectories on Freeways Using Dual Loop Detectors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 36, No. 4 2002, pp. 351–364.

10.

Eisele

W. L.

and Rilett

L. R.

Travel-Time Estimates Obtained from Intelligent Transportation Systems and Instrumented Test Vehicles: Statistical Comparison. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Board, No. 1804, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 8–16.

11.

Hellinga

B. R.

and Fu

Reducing Bias in Probe-Based Arterial Link Travel Time Estimates. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 10, No. 4 2002, pp. 257–273.

12.

Toppen

Jung

Shah

and Wunderlich

Toward a Strategy for Cost-Effective Deployment of Advanced Traveler Information Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1899, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 27–34.

13.

Archived Data User Service (ADUS): An Addendum to the ITS Program Plan. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Sept. 1998.

14.

Bertini

R. L.

Hansen

Byrd

and Yin

Experience Implementing a User Service for Archived Intelligent Transportation Systems Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1917, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 90–99.

15.

Manual of Traffic Engineering Studies. ITE, Washington, D.C., 2000.

16.

Turner

S. M.

Eisele

W. L.

Benz

R. J.

and Holdener

D. J.

Travel Time Data Collection Handbook. Report FHWA-PL-98-035. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.

17.

Bertini

R. L.

Monsere

C. M.

Byrd

Rose

and El-Seoud

T. A.

Using Custom Transportation Data Collection Software with Handheld Computers for Education, Research, and Practice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1924, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 37–45.

18.

Washington

Karlaftis

and Mannering

Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003.

19.

Hobeika

and Dhulipala

Estimation of Travel Times on Urban Freeways Under Incident Conditions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1867, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 97–106.

20.

Deeter

Monsere

Breakstone

and Bertini

R. L.

Evaluation of Freeway Travel Time Estimates: Final Report. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Aug. 2005.