Development of New Crash Experience Warrants for Traffic Signals in Ontario,Canada

Abstract

Traffic signals, if properly designed and justified according to current engineering practice, can improve the traffic safety and traffic operations at intersections. The effects of resulting crashes and the impacts on safety from the installation of traffic signals at unsignalized intersections are complicated, and the current literature and research on this topic are limited, even though traffic signals have been used for many years. The current crash warrants in the Ontario Traffic Manual, Book 12: Traffic Signals do not take into consideration the effect of traffic volume variations in crashes. It states that if conditions such as “five or more ‘correctable’ crashes per 12 month period averaged over a 36 month period” are satisfied, a signal may be warranted. The purpose of this paper is to develop and recommend a safety analysis and evaluation tool for estimating the expected safety of the installation of traffic signals through use of historical crash and volume data. The paper also provides a quantitative process tool for determining whether a traffic signal is justified at an unsignalized intersection. The proposed approach uses the empirical Bayes method and crash prediction models for estimating the safety effects on unsignalized intersections that are being considered for traffic signal installation. The performance of the proposed procedure is evaluated and analyzed on 17 unsignalized intersections taken from different jurisdictions in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Short

Woelfl

G. A.

and Chang

C. J.

Effects of Traffic Installation on Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 2 1982, pp. 135–145.

Thomas

G. V.

and Smith

D. J.

Effectiveness of Roadway Safety Improvement. Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, 2001.

Bauer

K. M.

and Harwood

D. W.

Statistical Models of At-Grade Intersection Accidents. FHWA-RD-96-125. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1996.

Solomon

Traffic Signals and Accidents in Michigan. Public Roads, Vol. 30, No. 10, Oct. 1959, pp. 234–237.

King

G. F.

and Goldblatt

R. B.

Relationship of Accident Patterns to Type of Intersection Control. In Transportation Research Record 540, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1975, pp. 1–12.

Agent

K. R.

Traffic Control and Accidents at Rural High-Speed Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1160, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 14–21.

Ontario Traffic Manual, Book 12: Traffic Signals. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, July 2001.

McGee

Taori

and Persaud

B. N.

NCHRP Report 491: Crash Experience Warrant for Traffic Signals. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Stewart

and McGill

A Novel Approach for Determining Traffic Signal Warrants. In Proc., Institute of Transportation Engineers Technical Conference and Exhibit (CD-ROM), Palm Harbor, Florida, March 24–27, 2002.

10.

Stewart

and McGill

A New Approach and Associated Evaluation–Analytical Methods for Measuring and Predicting Safety Levels at Intersections: Establishing an Objective, Quantitative Process for Determining Traffic Signal Safety Warrants. In Proc., Institute of Transportation Engineers, Canadian District Annual Conference (CD-ROM), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, May 12–16, 2002.

11.

Pernia

J. C.

J. J.

Xie

Weng

and Snyder

Development of Models to Quantify the Impacts of Signalization on Intersection Crashes.

Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.

12.

Persaud

B. N.

Do Traffic Signals Affect Safety? Some Methodological Issues. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 37–47.

13.

McCullagh

and Nelder

J. A.

Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.

14.

SAS/STAT Software: The GENMOD Procedure, Release 8.00. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.

15.

Lord

The Prediction of Accidents on Digital Network: Characteristics and Issues Related to the Application of Accident Prediction Models. PhD dissertation. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2000.

16.

Harwood

D. W.

Bauer

K. W.

Potts

I. B.

Torbic

D. J.

Richard

K. R.

Kohlman Rabbani

E. R.

Hauer

and Elefteriadou

Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes. FHWA-RD-02-089. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., July 2002.

17.

Hauer

Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.

18.

Persaud

B. N.

Retting

R. A.

Garder

P. E.

and Lord

Safety Effect of Roundabout Conversions in the United States. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1751, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 1–8.

19.

Stewart

A Risk Analysis and Evaluation System Model (RAESM) for Estimating Road Travel Risk Performance Measure Indicators: Ideas, Concepts and Methodologies for Measuring, Monitoring, Comparing and Evaluating the Level(s) of Safety on Road and Highway Systems. Proc., Conference Road Safety Europe, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Sept. 1998.

20.

Miaou

S.-P.

and Lord

Modeling Traffic Crash-Flow Relationships for Intersections: Dispersion Parameter, Function Form, and Bayes Versus Empirical Bayes Methods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 31–40.