Variable speed limits (VSL) were applied on I-4 in Orlando, Florida, through microsimulation to reduce crash likelihood. VSL application improved safety by simultaneously implementing lower speed limits upstream and higher speed limits downstream of the location where crash likelihood was observed in real time. Real-time crash likelihood was calculated with the use of models developed in previous research. The improvement was realized in the case of medium- to high-speed regimes on the freeway, but no benefit was achieved in low-speed situations; that is, there was no substantial safety benefit from applying VSL in congested situations. In addition to the safety benefit, travel time was also reduced. The simulation results showed a potential for crash migration. The crash potential appeared to relocate to a location downstream of the detector of interest. Upstream, little change occurred, except at the location where the change in speed took place. While there are some crash migration effects, the overall safety of the freeway was improved due to VSL application.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BorroughP.Variable Speed Limits Reduce Crashes Significantly in the U.K. Urban Transportation Monitor, March 14, 1997.
2.
HaT.KangJ. and ParkJ.The Effects of Automated Speed Enforcement Systems on Traffic-Flow Characteristics and Crashes in Korea. ITE Journal, Feb. 2003, pp. 28–31.
3.
Pilli-SivolaY.State of the Art in Finland Concerning RWIS and Variable Message Signs.Finnish National Road Administration, Feb. 2000.
4.
SmuldersS.Control of Freeway Traffic Flow by Variable Speed Signs. Transportation Research, Vol. 24B, 1990 pp. 111–132.
5.
RämäP.Effects of Weather-Controlled Variable Speed Limits and Warning Signs on Driver Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1689, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 53–59.
6.
LeeC.HellingaB. and SaccomannoF.Assessing Safety Benefits of Variable Speed Limits. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 183–190, 2004.
7.
PlacerJ.Fuzzy Variable Speed Limit Device Modification and Testing—Phase II.Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, July 2001.
8.
SisiopikuV.Variable Speed Control: Technologies and Practices.Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,Washington, D.C., 2001.
9.
SennL. Variable Speed Limit and In-Vehicle Signing Operational Test. Washington Department of Transportation. www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/atb/html/ta.html. Accessed April 28, 2004.
10.
PortaankorvaP.Road Weather and Traffic Data in Traffic Management. Presented at Standing International Road Weather Commission Conference, Sapporo, Japan, 2002.
11.
PeltolaH.The Role of Seasonal Speed Limits in Speed Management. Presented at 15th Workshop on International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts of Traffic Safety, Brno, Czech Republic, 1997.
12.
Abdel-AtyM.UddinN. and PandeA.Split Models for Predicting Multivehicle Crashes During High-Speed and Low-Speed Operating Conditions on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 51–58.
13.
BertiniR.LindgrenR. and TantiyanugulchaiS.Application of PARAMICS Simulation at a Diamond Interchange. Research Report PSU-CE-TRG-02-02. Transportation Research Group, Portland State University, Oregon, April 2002.
14.
AbdulhaiB.ShalabyA.LeeJ.J. and GeorgiA.Microsimulation Modeling and Impact Assessment of Streetcar Transit Priority Options: Toronto Experience.Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C., 2002.
15.
TrappR.Microscopic Traffic Flow Modeling of Large Urban Networks.Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C., 2002.
CheuR.-L.QiH. and LeeD.-H.Mobile Sensor and Sample-Based Algorithm for Freeway Incident Detection. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1811, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 12–20.
18.
GardesY. A.MayD.Jr.DahlgrenJ. W. and SkabardonisA.Freeway Calibration and Application of the PARAMICS Model.Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,Washington, D.C., 2002.
19.
LeeD.YangX. and ChandrasekarP.Parameter Calibration and Application of the PARAMICS Model.Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C., 2002.
20.
Abdel-AtyM. and DilmoreJ.Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits for Real-Time Freeway Safety Improvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, March 2006, pp. 335–345.
21.
PandeA.Abdel-AtyM. and HsiaL.Spatiotemporal Variation of Risk Preceding Crash on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 26–36.
22.
Abdel-AtyM.UddinN.PandeA.AbdallaM. F. and HsiaL.Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression. In Transportation Research Record; Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 88–95.
