Assessing Crash Occurrence on Urban Freeways by Applying a System of Interrelated Equations

Abstract

Most existing freeway crash frequency models analyze overall frequency of crashes. Furthermore, researchers have traditionally used average annual daily traffic (AADT) to represent traffic volume in their models. These two cases are examples of macroscopic crash frequency modeling. Segregating crashes on the basis of type of crash, peak or off-peak traffic conditions, lighting conditions, severity, and pavement condition could provide insight into the specific factors that affect each category. In this study multiple binary categorizations of the crashes were created to identify the factors associated with their frequencies and used geometric characteristics of the freeway and microscopic traffic variables that were based on loop detector data. These categorizations included multiple- and single-vehicle crashes, peak period and off peak period crashes, dry and wet pavement crashes, daytime and dark-hour crashes, and property-damage-only and injury crashes. Models for frequency of each of the two groups of crashes were estimated separately for all five categorizations. To account for correlation between the disturbance terms arising from omitted variables between any two models in a category, seemingly unrelated negative binomial (SUNB) regression was used for simultaneous estimation. SUNB estimation proved to be advantageous for multiple- and single-vehicle crashes and for daytime and dark-hour crashes. Road curvature and presence of on- or off-ramps were found to be the significant factors related to every crash category. Median type and pavement surface type were among other important factors affecting crashes. AADT was significant in most models and the 15-min coefficient of variation of speed was significant for frequency of daytime and peak period crashes. SUNB estimation proved to increase the efficiency of the crash frequency models by accounting for the disturbance correlation, reducing the standard errors, and providing better model fit.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Almanac and Book of Facts: 1996. World Almanac Books, Mahwah, N.J., 1995.

Ladron de Guevara

Washington

S. P.

and Oh

Forecasting Crashes at the Planning Level: A Simultaneous Negative Binomial Crash Model Applied in Tucson, Arizona. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 191–199.

Shankar

Mannering

and Barfield

Effect of Roadway Geometrics and Environmental factors on Rural Freeway Accident Frequencies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 3 1995, pp. 371–389.

Okamoto

and Koshi

A Method to Cope with the Random Errors of Observed Accident Rates in Regression Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 21, 1989, pp. 371–332.

Garber

and Joshua

Traffic and Geometric Characteristics Affecting the Involvement of Large Trucks in Accidents. VDOT Project 9242-062-940. Virginia Transportation Research Council, University Station, Charlottesville, 1990.

Chang

L.-Y.

Analysis of Freeway Accident Frequencies: Negative Binomial Regression Versus Artificial Neural Network. Safety Science, Vol. 43, No. 8 2005, pp. 541–557.

Chang

L.-Y.

and Chen

W.-C.

Data Mining of Tree-Based Models to Analyze Freeway Accident Frequency. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 36, No. 4 2005, pp. 365–375.

Metcalf

Aljanahi

and Rhodes

Speed, Speed Limits and Road Traffic Accidents Under Free-Flow Conditions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, 1999, pp. 161–168.

Kweon

Y.-J.

and Kockelman

Spatially Disaggregate Panel Models of Crash and Injury Counts: Effect of Speed Limits and Design.

Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

10.

Polanis

Some Thoughts About Traffic Accidents, Traffic Safety and the Safety Management System. ITE Journal, Vol. 65, No. 10, Oct. 1999, pp. 32–34.

11.

Garber

and Wu

Stochastic Models Relating Crash Probabilities with Geometric and Corresponding Traffic Characteristics Data. Research Report UVACTS-5-15-74. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 2001.

12.

Pasupathy

Ivan

and Ossenbruggen

Single- and Multi-Vehicle Prediction Models for Two-Lane Roadways. Final report. Project UCNR9-8. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.

13.

Lee

Saccomanno

and Hellinga

Analysis of Crash Precursors on Instrumented Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 1–8.

14.

Al-Deek

H. M.

and Chandra

C. V. S. R.

New Algorithms for Filtering and Imputation of Real-Time and Archived Dual-Loop Data in Data Warehouse. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1867, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2004, pp. 116–126.

15.

Abdel-Aty

Pande

Hsia

and Abdalla

The Potential for Real-Time Traffic Crash Prediction,

ITE Journal on the Web, Dec. 2005. www.ite.org/itejournal/webarticles.asp.

16.

Pande

Abdel-Aty

and Hsia

Spatiotemporal Variation of Risk Preceding Crashes on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 26–36.

17.

Abdel-Aty

Uddin

Pande

Abdalla

M. F.

and Hsia

Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, pp. 88–95, 2004.

18.

Washington

Karlaftis

and Mannering

Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003.

19.

Greene

Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1997.

20.

Judge

G. G.

Griffiths

W. E.

Carter

H. R.

Lütkepohl

and Lee

The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988.

21.

aML Version 2: User's Guide and Reference Manual. Econware, Los Angeles, Calif., 2003.