Laboratory Characterization of Recycled Concrete for Use as Pavement Base Material

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to characterize both demolition and haul-back sources of recycled concrete material (RCM) available in Utah County, Utah, for use as pavement base material and to investigate the self-cementing behaviors of each. A telephone survey was conducted to assess the state of the practice with respect to the local use of RCM, and extensive laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the strength and durability properties of both sources of RCM. Laboratory testing included determinations of particle-size distributions, Atterberg limits, specific gravity values, absorption characteristics, moisture–density relationships, California bearing ratio (CBR), unconfined compressive strength (UCS), stiffness, resistance to freeze–thaw cycling, tube suction test (TST) moisture susceptibility classifications, and Los Angeles abrasion losses. The results of the testing indicate that marked stiffening and strength gain of the materials occur within a 7-day curing period, although the rate and extent of the increases are dependent on the material source. The higher fines content of the haul-back material corresponded to higher absorption, optimum moisture content, maximum dry density, CBR, UCS, and stiffness values compared with the demolition material, presumably because of the exposure of greater quantities of unhydrated cement in the production of the haul-back RCM. However, the haul-back RCM was characterized by a greater loss in stiffness after freeze–thaw cycling and received a marginal moisture-susceptibility rating in the TST, while the demolition RCM was rated as non-moisture-susceptible. Further research is needed to more definitively investigate the self-cementing mechanism of RCM.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennert

Papp

W. J.

Jr. Maher

and Gucunski

Utilization of Construction and Demolition Debris Under Traffic-Type Loading in Base and Subbase Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1714, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 33–39.

Chesner

W. H.

White Paper and Specification for Reclaimed Concrete Aggregate for Unbound Soil Aggregate Base Course. Recycled Materials Resource Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, 2001.

Chini

A. R.

and Monteiro

F. R.

Recycled Concrete Aggregate as a Base Course. In Proc., 35th Annual Conference, ASC, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1999, pp. 307–318.

Chini

A. R.

Kuo

S.-S.

Armaghani

J. M.

and Duxbury

J. P.

Test of Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Accelerated Test Track. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 6, November–December 2001, pp. 486–492.

Concrete Paving Technology: Recycling Concrete Pavement. Publication TB-014P. American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, Ill., 1993.

Hansen

T. C.

Recycling of Demolished Concrete and Masonry. RILEM Report 6, E and FN Spon, London, 1992.

Lim

Kestner

Zollinger

D. G.

and Fowler

D. W.

Characterization of Crushed Concrete Materials for Paving and Non-Paving Applications. Report 7-4954. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2003.

Mulheron

and O'Mahony

M. M.

Properties and Performance of Recycled Aggregates. Highways and Transportation, Vol. 37, No. 2, February 1990, pp. 35–37.

Nataatmadja

and Tan

Y. L.

Resilient Modulus of Recycled Concrete Road Aggregates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 5, September–October 2001, pp. 450–453.

10.

O'Mahony

M. M.

and Milligan

G. W. E.

Use of Recycled Materials in Subbase Layers. In Transportation Research Record 1310, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 73–80.

11.

Petrarca

R. W.

and Galdiero

V. A.

Summary of Testing of Recycled Crushed Concrete. In Transportation Research Record 989, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 19–26.

12.

Recycling Concrete and Masonry. Publication EV 22. Environmental Council of Concrete Organizations, Skokie, Ill., 1999. www.ecco.org/pdfs/ev22.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2005.

13.

Tunison

L. A.

Vandenbossche

J. M.

and Snyder

M. B.

Uses of Recycled Portland Cement Concrete: State-of-the-Art. Final Report. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1993.

14.

Yrjanson

W. A.

NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 154: Recycling of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., December 1989.

15.

Independence Recycling, Inc., Valley View, Ohio. www.indrec.com/index.htm. Accessed April 15, 2005.

16.

Chase

G. W.

and Lane

Recycled Concrete for a State Highway. Building Research and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 6, November–December 1986, pp. 361–365.

17.

De Jong

E. J.

Alternative Materials in Road Construction: An Approach for Research Implementation. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Unbound Aggregates in Roads, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom, 1989, pp. 227–234.

18.

Klemens

T. L.

Interstate Slabs Recycled for Base. Highway and Heavy Construction, Vol. 133, No. 4 1990, pp. 32–34.

19.

Molenaar

A. A. A.

and van Niekerk

A. A.

Effects of Gradation, Composition, and Degree of Compaction on the Mechanical Characteristics of Recycled Unbound Materials. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1787, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 73–82.

20.

Richardson

B. J. E.

and Jordan

D. O.

Use of Recycled Concrete as a Road Pavement Material within Australia. Proc., Seventeenth ARRB Conference, Part 3, Australia Road Research Board, Nunawading, Australia, 1994, pp. 213–228.

21.

Urban Expressway Rebuilt on Recycled Concrete Base. Engineering News-Record, Vol. 203, No. 22, November 1979, pp. 24–25.

22.

Mindess

Young

J. F.

and Darwin

Concrete, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.

23.

Sweere

G. T. H.

Structural Contribution of Self-Cementing Granular Bases to Asphalt Pavements. Proc., Third International Symposium on Unbound Aggregates in Roads, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom, 1989, pp. 343–353.

24.

Quality Control for Recycled Concrete as a Structural Fill Material. Recycling Technology Assistance Partnership, Seattle, Wash. www.cwc.org/wood/wd975fs.PDF. Accessed October 15, 2003.

25.

Scullion

and Saarenketo

Using Suction and Dielectric Measurements as Performance Indicators for Aggregate Base Materials. In Transportation Research Record 1577, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 37–44.

26.

Guthrie

W. S.

and Scullion

Assessing Aggregate Strength and Frost Susceptibility Characteristics with the Tube Suction Test. Proc., Texas Section, American Society of Civil Engineers, Fall Meeting, El Paso, Tex., 2000, pp. 197–206.

27.

Saarenketo

Scullion

and Kolisoja

Moisture Susceptibility and Electrical Properties of Base Course Aggregates. Proc., Fifth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, Trondheim, Norway, 1998, pp. 1401–1410.