This paper develops an analytical model of the ultimate capacity of dual-dependent parallel runways (with close or intermediate spacing), where ultimate capacity is defined as the maximum number of aircraft accommodated during a given period (usually 1 h or 15 min) under constant demand for service and other given conditions. The model uses six inputs: geometry (configuration) of parallel runways; air traffic control (ATC) separation rules; technologies for aircraft primary navigation, communication, and air traffic surveillance, which influence separation rules and the degree of dependency of two runways; aircraft fleet mix in terms of wake–vortex categories and approach and departure speeds; proportion of arrival and departure demand; and ATC tactics of sequencing particular aircraft types and operations. The output represents the so-called capacity coverage curve, which reflects different scenarios of using given runways. The model is used to calculate the capacity of a large European airport.
EUROCONTROL.Testing Operational Scenarios for Concepts in ATM: TOSCA II. Interim Report. EEC Task FSO-11. EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium, 1997, p. 46.
3.
Air Traffic and Operational Data on Selected U.S. Airports with Parallel Runways. NASA/CR-1998–207675. National Aeronautic and Space Administration, Langley, Va., 1998.
4.
Rules of the Air and Air Traffic Services: Procedures for Air Navigation Services, 13th edition.4444-RAC/501. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5.
HammerJ.A Case Study of Paired Approach Procedure to Closely Spaced Parallel Runways.Air Traffic Control Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2000, pp. 223–252.
6.
Aviation System Capacity: Annual Report.Office for System Capacity and Requirements, FAA, Washington, D.C., 1993.
7.
IgnaccoloM.A Simulation Model for Airport Capacity and Delay Analysis.Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2003, pp. 135–170.
8.
JanicM.Air Transport System Analysis and Modeling: Capacity, Quality of Service and Economics.Transport Series Books Vol. 16. Taylor and Francis, London,2001.
9.
NewellG. F.Airport Capacity and Delays.Transportation Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1979, pp. 201–241.
10.
OdoniA. R., and BowmanJ.. Existing and Required Modeling Capabilities for Evaluating ATM Systems and Concepts. Final Report. No. NAG2-997. International Center for Air Transportation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1997.
11.
AndreattaG., and Romanin-JacurG.. Aircraft Flow Management Under Congestion.Transportation Science, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1987, pp. 249–253.
12.
BiancoL., and BielliM.. Air Traffic Management: Optimization Models and Algorithms.Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1992, pp. 131–167.
13.
RichettaO., and OdoniA. R.. Dynamic Solution to the Ground-Holding Problem in Air Traffic Control.Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1994, pp. 167–185.
14.
RichettaO., and OdoniA. R.. Solving Optimally the Static Ground Holding Policy Problem in Air Traffic Control.Transportation Science, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1993, pp. 228–238.
15.
RichettaO.Optimal Algorithms and a Remarkable Efficient Heuristic for the Ground Holding Problem in Air Traffic Control.Operations Research, Vol. 43, No. 5, 1995, pp. 758–770.
16.
TerrabM., and OdoniA. R.. Strategic Flow Management in Air Traffic Control.Operations Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1993, pp. 138–152.
17.
VranasP., BertsimasD. J., and OdoniA. R.. Dynamic Ground Holding Policies for a Network of Airports.Transportation Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1994, pp. 275–291.
18.
BlumsteinA.The Landing Capacity of a Runway.Operations Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1959, pp. 752–763.
19.
DonohueG. L.A Simplified Air Transportation Capacity Model.Journal of ATC, April–June 1999, pp. 8–15.
20.
DonohueG. L.United States and European Airport Capacity Assessment Using the GMU Macroscopic Capacity Model (MCM). In Proc., 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Air Traffic Control Association (ATCA), Alexandria, Va., 2000, p. 10.
21.
GilboE. P.Airport Capacity: Representation Estimation, Optimization.IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1993, pp. 144–153.
StamatopoulosM. A., ZografosK. G., and OdoniA. R.. A Decision Support System for Airport Strategic Planning.Transportation Research, Part C, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2004, pp. 91–117.
27.
WuC.-L., and CavesR.. Research Review of Air Traffic Management.Transport Reviews, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2002, pp. 115–132.
28.
TosicV., and HoronjeffR.. Effects of Multiple Path Approach Procedures on Runway Landing Capacity.Transportation Research, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1976, pp. 319–329.
29.
Data on European Airports.EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium, 1998.
30.
EDDF-SOP: Standard Operating Manual—Frankfurt Main Airport.Virtual Frankfurt Airport SOP V9.6. Fraport. http://www.vacc-sag.org. Accessed April 15, 2004.
