Comparison of Two Negative Binomial Regression Techniques in Developing Accident Prediction Models

Abstract

There are several regression techniques to develop accident prediction models. Model development and subsequently the results are affected by the choice of regression technique. The objective of this paper is to compare two types of regression techniques: the traditional negative binomial (TNB) and the modified negative binomial (MNB). The TNB approach assumes that the shape parameter of the negative binomial distribution is fixed for all locations, while the MNB approach assumes that this shape parameter varies with the location's characteristics. The difference between the two approaches in terms of their goodness of fit and the identification and ranking of accident-prone locations is investigated. The study makes use of a sample of accident, volume, and geometric data corresponding to 392 arterial segments in British Columbia, Canada. Both models appear to fit the data well. However, the MNB approach provides a statistically significant improvement in model fit over the TNB approach. A total of 100 locations were identified as accident-prone by both approaches. A comparison between the ranks showed a close agreement in the general trend of ranking between the two models. While the MNB approach appears to fit the data better than the TNB approach, there was little difference in the results of the identification and ranking of accident-prone locations. This is likely due to the nature of the application and the data set used. The difference in results will depend on the extent to which deviant sites exist in the data set.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hauer

On Exposure and Accident Rate.

Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1995, pp. 134–138.

Jovanis

P. P.

, and Chang

H.-L.

. Modeling the Relationship of Accidents to Miles Traveled. In Transportation Research Record 1068, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 42–51.

Hauer

, Ng

J. C. N.

, and Lovell

. Estimation of Safety at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 48–61.

Miaou

, and Lum

. Modeling Vehicle Accident and Highway Geometric Design Relationships. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1993, pp. 689–709.

Kulmala

, and Roine

. Accident Prediction Models for Two-Lane Roads in Finland. Proc., Conference on Traffic Safety Theory and Research Methods, Session 4: Statistical Analysis and Models, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1988, pp. 89–103.

Kulmala

Safety at Rural Three- and Four-Arm Junctions. Development of Accident Prediction Models. VTT Publication 233. Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo, 1995.

Hauer

Observational Before–After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Elsevier Science, Ltd., 1997.

Sayed

, deLeur

, and Sawalha

. Evaluating the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia Road-Safety Improvement Program. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1865, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 57–63.

Sawalha

, and Sayed

. Evaluating Safety of Urban Arterial Roadways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 2, April 2001, pp. 151–158.

10.

Maher

M. J.

, and Summersgill

. A Comprehensive Methodology for the Fitting of Predictive Accident Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1996, pp. 281–296.

11.

Hinde

, and Demetrio

C. G. B.

. Over-Dispersion: Model and Estimation. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1998, pp. 151–170.

12.

Lawless

J. F.

Negative Binomial and Poisson Regression.

Canadian Journal of Statistics, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1987, pp. 209–225.

13.

Heydecker

B. G.

, and Wu.

Identification of Sites for Accident Remedial Work by Bayesian Statistical Methods: An Example of Uncertain Inference.

Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 32, 2001, pp. 859–869.

14.

Miaou

S.-P.

, and Lord

. Modeling Traffic Crash–Flow Relationships for Intersections: Dispersion Parameter, Functional Form, and Bayes Versus Empirical Bayes Methods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 31–40.

15.

Miranda-Moreno

L. F.

, Fu

, Saccomanno

F. F.

, and Labbe

. Alternative Risk Models for Ranking Locations for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1–8.

16.

McCullagh

, and Nelder

J. A.

. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall

New York,

1989.

17.

Aitkin

, Anderson

, Francis

, and Hinde

. Statistical Modeling in GLIM. Oxford University Press

New York,

1989.

18.

GENMOD, IML and NLPTR Functions, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., 1987.

19.

Hauer

Empirical Bayes Approach to the Estimation of Unsafety: The Multivariate Regression Method.

Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 5, 1992, pp. 457–477.

20.

Sayed

, and Rodriguez

. Accident Prediction Models for Urban Unsignalized Intersections in British Columbia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 93–99.