Visually Improving Construction Contract Administration

Abstract

The construction industry runs into many claim and dispute issues. Often these can be associated with the contractual conditions. What if the conditions themselves or the people writing them are not causing the problems? The blame may fall on the actual reading of the complex conditions and the inability of the human brain to comprehend all the information read. The field of psychology can be used to support this claim as well as to support the potential solution of use of flowcharts to illustrate contract conditions. The flowcharts provide a visual framework to complement and organize the text of the conditions. A project was designed with the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University to collaborate and investigate flowchart usage. Flowcharts depicting general conditions were produced, and the outcomes of the project support the claim that a greater understanding can be achieved with the creation and use of flowchart-based conditions complementing the text format.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Road and Bridge Specifications. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, 2002.

Woodhull

Disputes Prevention Alternative for the Construction Industry. Proc., CMAA National Conference and Trade Show, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Fenn

Why Construction Contracts Go Wrong (or an Aetiological Approach to Construction Disputes). Society of Construction Law, Wantage, Oxfordshire, UK, 2002.

Roebeck

M. C.

and Wallace

R. R.

The Psychology of Reading: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1990.

Britton

B. K.

Glynn

S. M.

and Smith

J. W.

Cognitive Demands of Processing Expository Text: A Cognitive Workbench Model. In Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyzing Explanatory Text ( Britton

B. K.

and Black

J. B.

, eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1985.

Jones

G. P.

A New Approach to the Standard Form of Building Contract. Medical and Technical Publishing Co., Oxford, England, 1972.

Institution of Civil Engineers. The New Engineering Contract. Thomas Telford, London, 1991.

Levin

J. R.

Anglin

G. J.

and Carney

R. N.

On Empirically Validating Functions of Pictures in Prose. In The Psychology of Illustration, Vol. 1 ( Willows

D. M.

and Houghton

H. A.

, eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.

Wankat

and Oreovicz

Teaching Engineering. engineering.purdue.edu/ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html. Accessed Jan. 2005.

10.

Broome

J. C.

and Hayes

R. W.

A Comparison of the Clarity of Traditional Construction Contracts and of the New Engineering Contract. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15, No. 4 1997, pp. 255–261.

11.

Vekiri

What Is the Value of Graphical Displays in Learning?

Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 14, No. 3 2002, pp. 261–312.

12.

Verdi

M. P.

Kulhavy

R. W.

Stock

W. A.

Rittschof

K. A.

and Johnson

J. T.

Text Learning Using Scientific Diagrams: Implications for Classroom Use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 21, 1996, pp. 487–499.

13.

Jones

G. P.

A New Approach to the International Civil Engineering Contract. A Detailed Analysis of the FIDIC International Standard Form of Civil Engineering Contract. Construction Press, Lancaster, England, 1979.