Exposure of Soil and Groundwater to Spills of Hazardous Materials Transported by Rail

Abstract

The environmental impact of a hazardous material spill is a complex function of the material's physical and chemical characteristics and the local environmental conditions in which it is spilled. This study develops a geographical probability distribution for two important environmental parameters affecting this impact: soil type and groundwater depth. The paper assesses the probability of exposure of various soil types and groundwater depth regions to hazardous material spills from railroad tank car accidents. The State Soil Geographic database (STATSGO), a geographic information system (GIS) database from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, was used to analyze soils, and real-time groundwater data from the U.S. Geological Survey were used to analyze groundwater. The “rail2m” GIS database available from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics was used to conduct overlay analyses with the soil GIS data to obtain the probability of occurrence of various soil types under rail lines. The same method could not be used for groundwater exposure because no suitable GIS database for this parameter was available. Therefore, a nationwide probability distribution of the groundwater depth ranges was developed. The proportion of the three soil types under rail lines was 44.0% for sand, 51.2% for silt, and 4.0% for clay, the remainder being over surface water. The probability of occurrence of five groundwater depth regions was 16.4% for 5 to 15 ft, 12.6% for 15 to 25 ft, 23.3% for 25 to 75 ft, 12.0% for 75 to 125 ft, and 35.9% for greater than 125 ft. A matrix of the probability distribution of environmental scenarios was developed; it is suitable for use in conducting environmental risk assessments of railroad transportation of hazardous materials.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bureau of Explosives. Annual Report of Hazardous Materials Transported by Rail: Calendar Year 2004. Association of American Railroads, Pueblo, Colo., 2005.

Anderson

and Barkan

C. P. L.

Railroad Accident Rates for Use in Transportation Risk Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1863, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 88–98.

Saat

M. R.

and Barkan

C. P. L.

Release Risk and Optimization of Railroad Tank Car Safety Design. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1916, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 78–87.

Barkan

C. P. L.

Glickman

T. S.

and Harvey

A. E.

Benefit–Cost Evaluation of Using Different Specification Tank Cars to Reduce the Risk of Transporting Environmentally Sensitive Chemicals. In Transportation Research Record 1313, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 33–43.

Anand

Quantitative Assessment of the Exposure of Environmental Characteristics to Railroad Spills of Hazardous Materials. M.S. thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, 2004.

Fetter

C. W.

Contaminant Hydrogeology. Macmillan, New York, 1993.

Natural Resources Conservation Service. State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Database. www.ncgc.nrcs.usda.gov/branch/ssb/products/statsgo/index.html. Accessed Dec. 2001.

Earth System Science Center Website. Soil Information for Environmental Modeling and Ecosystem Management. www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/index.cgi?soil_data&conus&background. Last updated May 1998. Accessed Nov. 2005.

Brown

R. B.

and Comerford

N. B.

Uses and Limitations of Soil Surveys for Forestry. Document SL-42. Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. www.edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SS177. Accessed Nov. 2005.

10.

Brown

R. B.

and Comerford

N. B.

Soil Texture. Document SL-29. Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. www.edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SS169. Accessed Nov. 2005.

11.

Karathanasis

A. D.

and Shaw

J. N.

(eds.). Part B. Soil Profile Properties and Interpretations. Handbook for Collegiate Soils Contest. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. www.ag.auburn.edu/aaes/soiljudge/handbook/profileprop.html. Accessed May 2002.

12.

Hillel

Introduction to Soil Physics. Academic Press, New York, 1982.

13.

Poulsen

M. M.

and Keuper

B. H.

A Field Experiment to Study the Behavior of Tetrachloroethylene in Unsaturated Porous Media. Environmental Science & Technology Research, Vol. 26, No. 5 1992, pp. 889–895.

14.

United States Geological Survey Real Time Groundwater Data Website. www.waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/current/?type=gw. Accessed Nov. 2002 and April 2003.

15.

Anand

Cost Effectiveness of Reducing Environmental Risk from Railroad Tank Car Transportation of Hazardous Materials. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, 2006.

16.

Anand

Barkan

C. P. L.

Schaeffer

D. J.

Werth

C. J.

and Minsker

B. S.

Environmental Risk Analysis of Chemicals Transported in Railroad Tank Cars. Proc., 8th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference on Safety, Environment, Productivity. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June 14–16, 2005, International Heavy Haul Association, Virginia Beach, Va., pp. 395–403.