Designing On-Road Vehicle Test Programs for the Development of Effective Vehicle Emission Models

Abstract

Mobile source emission models for years have depended on laboratory-based dynamometer data. Recently, however, portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) have become commercially available and in widespread use, and make on-road real-world measurements possible. As a result, the newest mobile source emission models (e.g., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's mobile vehicle emission simulator) are becoming increasingly dependent on PEMS data. Although on-road measurements are made under more realistic conditions than laboratory-based dynamometer test cycles, they introduce influencing variables that must be carefully measured for properly developed emission models. Further, test programs that simply measure in-use driving patterns of randomly selected vehicles will result in models that can effectively predict current-year emission inventories for typical driving conditions. However, when predicting more aggressive transportation operations than current typical operations (e.g., higher speeds, accelerations), the model predictions will be less certain. In this paper, various issues associated with on-road emission measurements and modeling are presented. Further, an example on-road emission data set and the reduction in estimation error through the addition of a short aggressive driving test to the in-use data are examined. On the basis of these results, recommendations are made on how to improve the on-road test programs for developing more robust emission models.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gammariello

, and Long

J. R.

. Development of Unified Correction Cycles. Proc., CRC 6th Annual On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, Calif., 1996.

Federal Test Procedure Review Project: Technical Report. EPA Technical Report 420-R-93-007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., May 1993.

Beardsley

MOVES Model Update. Proc., 14th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, Hyatt Islandia, San Diego, Calif., March 29–31, 2004.

Koupal

, Cumberworth

, Michaels

, Beardsley

, and Brzezinski

. Draft Design and Implementation Plan for EPA's Multi-Scale Motor Vehicle and Equipment Emission System (MOVES). U.S. EPA Technical Report 420-P-02-006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2002.

Vojtisek-Lom

, and Cobb

J. T.

. Vehicle Mass Emissions Measurement Using a Portable 5-Gas Exhaust Analyzer and Engine Computer Data. Proceedings, Emission Inventory, Planning for the Future. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1997.

Scarbro

An Investigation of ROVER's Capabilities to Accurately Measure the In-Use Activity and Emissions of Late-Model Diesel and Gasoline Trucks.

Proc., 10th CRC On-Road Emissions Workshop, San Diego, Calif., 2000.

Anderson

Development of a Novel On-Board Sampling and Conditioning System for the Measurement of Particulate Matter, Gases, and Air Toxics—Report on Phase 1.

Proc., 14th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, Hyatt Islandia, San Diego, Calif., March 29–31, 2004.

Witze

P. On-Board

, Time-Resolved Diesel Particulate Measurements by Laser-Induced Incandescence. Proc., 14th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, Hyatt Islandia, San Diego, Calif., March 29–31, 2004.

Shah

, and Booker

. Advances in the Quartz Crystal Microbalance for In-Use Measurements on Diesel and Gasoline Powered Vehicles. Proc., 14th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, Hyatt Islandia, San Diego, Calif., March 29–31, 2004.

10.

Spears

On-Vehicle Gaseous Emissions Measurements from Thirty-Two Light-Duty Diesel, Gasoline, CNG, and Hydrogen-Fueled Vehicles.

Proc., 14th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, Hyatt Islandia, San Diego, Calif., March 29–31, 2004.

11.

Frey

H. C.

Variability and Uncertainty in Highway Vehicle Emission Factors.

Emission Inventory: Planning for the Future, Oct. 28–30, 1997, Research Triangle Park, N.C., Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1997, pp. 208–219.

12.

Frey

H. C.

, Bharvirkar

, and Zheng

. Quantitative Analysis of Variability and Uncertainty in Emissions Estimation. Final report, prepared by North Carolina State University for Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C., July 1999.

13.

Computational Laboratory for Energy, Air, and Risk, Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University.

Methodology for Developing Modal Emission Rates for EPA's Multi-Scale Motor Vehicle and Equipment Emission System. EPA Technical Report EPA420-R-02-027, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2002.

14.

Younglove

, Barth

, Malcolm

, and Scora

. Mobile Source Emissions New Generation Model: Using a Hybrid Database Prediction Technique. EPA final report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 2002. www.epa.gov/otaq/models/ngm/cecert.pdf. Accessed July 2004.

15.

Hart

, Koupal

, and Giannelli

. EPA's Onboard Analysis Shootout: Overview and Results. EPA Technical Report 420-R-02-026, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2002.

16.

Federal Test Procedure. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 86–99, Office of the Federal Register, Washington, D.C., 1989.

17.

Barth

, An

, Younglove

, Levine

, Scora

, Ross

, and Wenzel

. Development of a Modal Emissions Model. NCHRP Project 25-11, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

18.

Jimenez-Palacios

Understanding and Quantifying Motor Vehicle Emissions and Vehicle Specific Power with TILDAS Remote Sensing. Doctoral thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1999.