Effects of Interface Workload of In-Vehicle Information Systems on Driving Safety

Abstract

Driver distraction and lack of awareness of the driving situation are major causes of accidents in the urban areas in Taiwan; failing to obey traffic signals is the third leading accident cause. Numerous innovative in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) could be used collectively to provide drivers with a variety of information, such as messages from intersection collision warning systems (ICWS) by way of different in-vehicle interfaces. How the different IVIS interfaces influence driver workload and safety is always an important issue. This study investigates the effects of auditory ICWS messages on driver performance while the driver's visual, hearing, or mental processing attention resources (or all three) are engaged by secondary tasks. This type of engagement or distraction commonly occurs when a driver uses IVIS. The secondary tasks used to distract drivers were created by different types of mathematical questions presented with different types of display devices (e.g., voice from a speaker or numbers shown on a liquid crystal display screen or head-up display). Mixed linear models were employed to examine the factors influencing driver perception–reaction time with the consideration of repeated measures. Several factors, including several main factors and an interaction, were found to be significant. The most important finding was that the interaction between provision of ICWS information and the display format indicated that an auditory warning message could increase driver perception–reaction time while a driver was distracted by an auditory task. In addition, it was found that driver distraction due to different mental processing tasks had a significant impact on driver perception–reaction time.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cheng

, Hashimoto

, and Suetomi

. Analysis of Driver Response to Collision Warning During Car Following. JSAE Review, Vol. 23, 2002, pp. 231–237.

Ben-Yaacov

, Maltz

, and Shinar

. Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short-and Long-Term Driving Performance. Human Factors, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2002.

Moon

Y.-J.

, Lee

, and Park

. System Integration and Field Tests for Developing In-Vehicle Dilemma Zone Warning System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1826, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 53–59.

Belz

S. M.

, Robinson

G. S.

, and Casali

J. G.

. A New Class of Auditory Warning Signals for Complex Systems: Auditory Icons. Human Factors, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1999.

Chen

W.-H.

, and Jovanis

P. P.

. Driver En Route Guidance Compliance and Driver Learning with Advanced Traveler Information Systems: Analysis with Travel Simulation Experiment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1843, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 81–88.

Littell

R. C.

, Milliken

G. A.

, Stroup

W. W.

, and Wolfinger

R. D.

. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc.,

Gary, N.C.,

1996.

Littell

R. C.

Modeling Variation in Repeated Measures Data.

Proc., Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, SAS Institute, Inc., Gary, N.C., 1995.

Wolfinger

, and Chang

. Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED Procedures for Repeated Measures. Proc., Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, SAS Institute, Inc., Gary, N.C., 1995.

Nowakowski

, and Green

. Map Design: An On-the-Road Evaluation of the Time to Read Electronic Navigation Displays. Technical Report UMTRI-98-4. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute,

Ann Arbor,

1998.

10.

Green

Why Safety and Human Factors/Ergonomics Standards Are So Difficult to Establish. In Human Factors in Transportation, Communication, Health and the Workplace ( de Waard

, Brookhuis

, Moraal

, and Toffetti

, eds.), Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2002.

11.

Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, Version 3. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Washington, D.C., 2003.