Structural Contribution of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Working Platforms in Flexible Pavement

Abstract

A study was conducted in the field and with a large-scale model experiment (LSME) to evaluate the structural contribution of a 0.30-m-thick geosynthetic-reinforced granular layer used as a working platform for construction over soft subgrade. The study was conducted in the context of the 1993 AASHTO design guideline, in which the structural number (SN) of the pavement is based on layer coefficients (each defined using a resilient modulus). Working platforms reinforced with geosynthetics had smaller elastic deflections and larger elastic moduli than unreinforced working platforms with the same thickness. Reinforcement factors obtained in the field ranged from 1.2 to 1.8; those obtained in the laboratory ranged from 1.7 to 2.0, with greater reinforcement factors for the less extensible geosynthetics (geogrid, woven geotextile) for a 0.3-m-thick granular working platform. Of the four geosynthetics tested, the geogrid resulted in the greatest increase in modulus. Reinforcing the working platforms with geosynthetics resulted in increases in layer coefficients ranging from 50% to 70%. Similarly, increases in SN for a typical pavement structure were realized, ranging from 3% to 11% when all other factors were equal.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Montanelli

, Zhao

, and Rimoldi

. Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pavement System: Testing and Design. Proc., Geosynthetics ‘97, Vol. 2, IFAI, Long Beach, Calif., 1997, pp. 619–632.

Perkins

S. W.

Mechanical Response of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Flexible Pavements.

Geosynthetics International, Vol. 6, No. 5, 1999, pp. 347–382.

Standard Specification for Highway and Structure Construction. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, 1996.

Tanyu

, Kim

W. H.

, Edil

T. B.

, and Benson

C. H.

. Comparison of Laboratory Resilient Modulus with Back-Calculated Elastic Moduli from Large-Scale Model Experiments and FWD Tests on Granular Materials. In Resilient Modulus Testing for Pavement Components ( Durham

, Marr

, and De Groff

, eds.). ASTM STP 1437. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2003, pp. 191–208.

Huang

Y. H.

Pavement Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993.

Kim

W. H.

Behavior of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Aggregate Platforms Over Soft Subgrades. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin– Madison, 2003.

Farrag

Strain Gauge Installation on Geosynthetics. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Louisiana State University,

Baton Rouge, La.,

1999.

Chew

S. H.

, Wong

W. K.

, Ng

C. C.

, Tan

S. A.

, and Karunaratne

G. P.

. Strain Gauging Geotextiles Using External Gauge Attachment Method. In Grips, Clamps, Clamping Techniques, and Strain Measurement for Testing of Geosynthetics ( Stevenson

P. E.

, ed.). ASTM STP 1379. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 2000, pp. 97–110.

Hayden

S. A.

, Humphrey

D. N.

, Christopher

B. R.

, Henry

K. S.

, and Fetten

C. P.

. Effectiveness of Geosynthetics for Roadway Construction in Cold Regions: Results of a Multi-Use Test Section. Proc., Geosynthetics ‘99, Vol. 2, Industrial Fabrics Association International (IFAI), Boston, Mass., 1999, pp. 847–862.

10.

Edil

T. B.

, Benson

C. H.

, Bin-Shafique

, Tanyu

B. F.

, Kim

W.-H.

, and Senol

. Field Evaluation of Construction Alternatives for Roadways over Soft Subgrade. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1786, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 36–48.

11.

Hicks

R. G.

, and Monismith

C. L.

. Factors Influencing the Resilient Properties of Granular Materials. In Highway Research Record 345, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 15–31.

12.

Texas Transportation Institute.

MODULUS 5.0: USER's Manual. Research Report 1987-1. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, 1991.

13.

Fannin

R. J.

, and Sigurdsson

. Field Observations on Stabilization of Unpaved Roads with Geosynthetics. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 7, 1996, pp. 544–553.

14.

Leng

, and Gabr

M. A.

. Characteristics of Geogrid-Reinforced Aggregate under Cyclic Load. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1786, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 29–35.

15.

Haas

, Walls

, and Carroll

R. G.

. Geogrid Reinforcement of Granular Bases in Flexible Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 1188, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 19–27.

16.

Kinney

T. C.

, Abbott

, and Schuler

. Benefits of Using Geogrids for Base Reinforcement with Regard to Rutting. In Transportation Research Record 1611, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 86–96.

17.

Collin

J. G.

, Kinney

T. C.

, and Fu

Full Scale Highway Load Test of Flexible Pavement Systems with Geogrid Reinforced Base Courses.

Geosynthetics International, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1996, pp. 537–549.

18.

Perkins

S. W.

Mechanistic-Empirical Modeling and Design Model Development of Geosynthetic Reinforced Flexible Pavements. Report No. FHWA/MN-01002/99160-1A. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2001.

19.

Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Publication, Washington, D.C., 1993.

20.

Rada

, and Witcazk

. Comprehensive Evaluation of Laboratory Resilient Moduli Results for Granular Material. In Transportation Research Record 810, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 23–33.