Do Telecommunications Affect Passenger Travel or Vice Versa?

Abstract

This study explores the aggregate causal relationships between telecommunications and travel in a comprehensive framework, considering their demand, supply, and costs, together with land use, economic activity, and sociodemographic variables. On the basis of a hypothesized conceptual model, composite indexes were developed for endogenous variable categories (telecommunications and travel demand, supply, costs, land use, and economic activity) by confirmatory factor analysis, with the use of national time series data (1950–2000) in the United States. Then, single-equation and structural equation models for telecommunications (telephone calls and mobile phone subscribers, separately) and travel were estimated, with the composite indexes and sociodemographic measures used as explanatory variables. Overall, the model results suggest that the aggregate relationship between actual amounts of travel and telecommunications is complementarity, not substitution. That is, as telecommunications demand increases, travel demand increases, and vice versa. In addition, it was found that the causal effects of travel demand on telecommunications demand were larger than those in the reverse direction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Salomon

Telecommunications and Travel Relationships: A Review.

Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1986, pp. 223–238.

Mokhtarian

P. L.

A Typology of Relationships Between Telecommunications and Transportation.

Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1990, pp. 231–242.

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Telecommunications and Travel: The Case for Complementarity.

Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2002, pp. 43–57.

Plaut

P. O.

Transportation—Communication Relationships in Industry.

Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 31, No. 6, 1997, pp. 419–429.

Selvanathan

E. A.

, and Selvanathan

. The Demand for Transport and Communication in the United Kingdom and Australia. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1994, pp. 1–9.

Graham

, and Marvin

. Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Spaces. Routledge, London, 1996.

Costantino

The IVHS Strategic Plan for the United States.

Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 4, 1992, pp. 481–490.

Cervero

, and Landis

. Why the Transportation-Land Use Connection Is Still Important. TR News, Vol. 187, 1996, pp. 9–13.

Pickrell

Transportation and Land Use. In Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy: A Handbook in Honor of John R. Meyer ( Gómez-Ibáñez

, Tye

W. B.

, and Winston

, eds.), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 403–435.

10.

Keane

T. F.

The Economic Importance of the National Highway System.

Public Roads On-line. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1996. www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/pubrds.htm. Accessed March 16, 2002.

11.

Saunders

R. J.

, Warford

J. J.

, and Wellenius

. Telecommunications & Economic Development, 2nd ed. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1994.

12.

Greene

D. L.

Vehicle Use and Fuel Economy: How Big Is the “Rebound” Effect?

Energy Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1992, pp. 17–143.

13.

Schafer

The Global Demand for Motorized Mobility.

Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 32, No. 6, 1998, pp. 455–477.

14.

Golob

T. F.

Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research.

Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 37, Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 1–25.

15.

Choo

Aggregate Relationships Between Telecommunications and Travel: Structural Equation Modeling of Time Series Data. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, 2004. www.uctc.net/papers/diss112.pdf. Accessed Oct. 30, 2004.

16.

Mueller

R. O.

Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. Springer, New York, 1996.

17.

Mankiw

N. G.

Macroeconomics, 5th ed. Worth Publishers, New York, 2003.

18.

Statistical Abstract of the United States. Administrative and Customer Services Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2003. www.census.gov/statab/www/. Accessed Feb. 22, 2004.

19.

Kline

R. B.

Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York, 1998.

20.

Bagley

M. N.

, and Mokhtarian

P. L.

. The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 279–297.

21.

Molin

E. J. E.

, and Timmermans

H. J. P.

. Testing Hierarchical Information Integration Theory: The Causal Structure of Household Residential Satisfaction. Environmental and Planning A, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43–58.

22.

Arbuckle

J. L.

, and Wothke

. Amos 4.0 User's Guide. SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago, Ill., 1999.

23.

Horowitz

J. L.

, Koppelman

F. S.

, and Lerman

S. R.

. A Self-Instructing Course in Disaggregate Mode Choice Modeling. Publication No. IA-11–0006, U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C., 1986.

24.

Pisarski

A. E.

New Perspectives in Commuting: Based on Early Data from the 1990 Decennial Census and the 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Study. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1992.