Effect of Lane Width on Speeds of Cars and Heavy Vehicles in Work Zones

Abstract

Traffic data were collected from 11 work zones on Interstate highways in Illinois in which one of the two lanes was open. The reductions in free-flow speed (FFS) due to narrow lanes and lateral clearances in work zones were studied. It was found that the reductions in FFSs of vehicles in work zones because of narrow lanes were higher than the reductions given in the Highway Capacity Manual for basic freeway sections. The data also showed that the narrower the lane was, the greater the speed reduction was. The data showed that the FFSs of heavy vehicles were statistically lower than the FFSs of passenger cars, even though the speed limit was the same for both types of vehicles. In addition, the reduction in the FFSs of heavy vehicles was greater than the reduction in the FFSs of passenger cars. This greater reduction in the speed of heavy vehicles affected the performance of the traffic stream in work zones. Thus, it should be considered in the computation of the passenger car equivalence for heavy vehicles. It is recommended that 10, 7, 4.4, and 2.1 mph be used for speed reduction in work zones for lane widths of 10, 10.5, 11, and 11.5 ft, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wunderlich

, and Hardesty

A Snapshot of Work Zone Activity Reported on State Road Closure and Construction Websites. Mitretek Systems, Falls Church, Va., Dec. 2002.

Chin

S. M.

, Franzese

, Greene

D. L.

, Hwang

H. L.

, and Gibson

R. C.

Temporary Losses of Highway Capacity and Impacts on Performance. Report ORNL/TM-2002/3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2002.

Benekohal

R. F.

, Kaja-Mohideen

A. Z.

, and Chitturi

M. V.

Methodology for Estimating Operating Speed and Capacity in Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1883, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, p. 103–111.

Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

Stonex

K. A.

, and Noble

C. M.

Curve Design and Tests on the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Highway Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 20, 1940.

Matson

, Smith

, and Hurd

Traffic Engineering. McGraw Hill, New York, 1955.

Traffic Engineering Handbook. AASHO, Washington, D.C., 1950.

Curren

J. E.

NCHRP Report 369: Use of Shoulders and Narrow Lanes to Increase Freeway Capacity. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.

Heimbach

C. L.

, Cribbins

P. D.

, and Chang

M.-S.

Some Partial Consequences of Reduced Traffic Lane Widths on Urban Arterials (Abridgment). In Transportation Research Record 923, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 69–72.

10.

Fitzpatrick

, Carlson

P. J.

, Wooldridge

M. D.

, and Brewer

M. A.

Design Factors That Affect Driver Speed on Suburban Arterials. Report FHWA/TX-00/1769-3. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Aug. 1999.

11.

Kemper

W. J.

, Lum

H. S.

, and Tignor

S. C.

Safety of Narrow Lanes for Traffic Control at a Construction Site. Public Roads, Vol. 47, No. 4, 1984, pp. 119–124.

12.

Benekohal

R. F.

, Kaja-Mohideen

A. Z.

, and Chitturi

M. V.

Evaluation of Construction Work Zone Operational Issues: Capacity, Queue and Delay. ITRC FR 00/01-4. Illinois Transportation Research Center, Edwardsville, 2003.

13.

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.

14.

Tignor

S. C.

Driver Speed Behavior on U.S. Streets and Highways. Compendium of Technical Papers. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1990.