Aggregate-Based Modulus of Elasticity for Florida Concrete

Abstract

The current empirical model for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) concrete modulus of elasticity (E) is a function of concrete compressive strength and unit weight. Recent testing shows that this model consistently underestimates E for FDOT concrete. This underestimation may lead to construction problems caused by the overprediction of camber and the deflection of concrete structural members. E values for the typical concrete mix used in FDOT projects were experimentally determined at various concrete ages. Regression analyses were used to find the E models that best fit the generated data, and such models were compared with existing E models from the literature. It was found that the aggregate type and specific gravity play significant roles in influencing the E value of concrete. The best-fit E models for FDOT concrete, together with suggested modification factors for various aggregate types, are recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Florida Department of Transportation Structures Design Guidelines for Load and Resistance Factor Design. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2003.

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 2nd ed., 2003 Interim Revisions. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Cook

J. E.

10,000 psi Concrete. Concrete International Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 11, No. 10, 1989, pp. 67–75.

Amornsrivilai

, Bloomquist

, Dobson

, Meletiou

C. A.

, Richardson

, Soongswang

, Tia

, and Yang

M. C. K.

Field and Laboratory Study of Modulus of Rupture and Permeability of Structural Concretes in Florida. State Project No. 99700-7387-119. University of Florida, Gainesville, 1989.

Amornsrivilai

, Bloomquist

, Dobson

, Meletiou

C. A.

, Richardson

, Shih

, and Tia

Extension of Field and Laboratory Study of Modulus of Rupture and Permeability of Structural Concrete in Florida. State Project No. 99700-7479-010. University of Florida, Gainesville, 1991.

Amornsrivilai

, Bloomquist

, Dobson

, Meletiou

C. A.

, Richardson

, Shih

, Tia

, and Yang

M. C. K.

Extension Study of Field and Laboratory Study of Modulus of Rupture and Permeability of Structural Concrete in Florida for Development of a Concrete Performance Specification. State Project No. 99700-7387-119. University of Florida, Gainesville, 1992.

Pauw

Static Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete as Affected by Density. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, Vol. 57, 1960, pp. 679–687.

American Concrete Institute Committee 363. State-of-the-Art Report on High-Strength Concrete. ACI 363R. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 1997.

Florida Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2004.

10.

CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code Comite EURO-International Du Buton. Thomas Telford Ltd., London, 1993.

11.

Mehta

K. P.

Concrete Structure, Properties, and Materials. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1986.

12.

American Concrete Institute Committee 225. Guide to the Selection and Use of Hydraulic Cements. ACI 225R. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 1999.

13.

Bates

, and Watts

Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1988.

14.

Myers

R. H.

Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. PWS Publishers, Boston, Mass., 1986.

15.

Wetherill

Regression Analysis with Applications. Chapman and Hall, London, 1986.

16.

Triola

M. F.

Elementary Statistics, 7th ed. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Boston, Mass., 1998.